How Two Candidates for Georgia Supreme Court Differ on Approach to Election
Former Rep. John Barrow, D-Georgia, has twice released long lists of backers, many of whom, but not all, are stalwart Democrats, while Georgia Court of Appeals Judge Sara Doyle said doing the same for her would be inappropriate for her in her current job.
September 04, 2019 at 06:53 PM
4 minute read
Former Rep. John Barrow, D-Georgia, (left) and Georgia Court of Appeals Judge Sara Doyle. (Photos: John Disney/ALM)
The two announced candidates for an opening on the Georgia Supreme Court next year had taken different approaches to running for the job thus far.
Athens lawyer and former Rep. John Barrow, D-Georgia, and Georgia Court of Appeals Judge Sara Doyle are already campaigning for election in May 2020 to the seat that will be opened by Justice Robert Benham's planned retirement in December.
Barrow has twice released long lists of backers, many of whom, but not all, are stalwart Democrats, while Doyle said doing the same for her would be inappropriate in her current job.
Barrow said he would release lists by regions. The first, for metro Atlanta, included former Gov. Roy Barnes, the last Democrat to hold that office, former Rep. Buddy Darden, D-Georgia, of Pope McGlamry and former Atlanta Mayor and Rep. Andrew Young, D-Georgia. That list contained 170 names. The second list contained 200 names from around Georgia.
"I'm grateful for the support of these leaders all across the state," Barrow said in a news release with the list. "What they tell me is that they want the kind of balance that I bring to the Court. We need someone who understands the issues that matter to real people in the real world."
Doyle has refrained from publicly naming supporters because of her current job. She said she wouldn't want to name as supporters lawyers arguing before her on the Court of Appeals.
"I think it's awkward for me as a sitting judge," Doyle said. "It puts lawyers in an awkward position."
Doyle said she has used names of supporters on social media posts when they've hosted fundraising events. And of course the campaign finance reports provide the names of supporters for both candidates.
In the first reporting period that ended June 30, Barrow reported $304,100 raised, and Doyle reported $223,470.
Their reports show Barrow had more big donors and Doyle had more total contributors thus far. Barrow had 17 backers who gave the limit—$7,000. Doyle had five of those. Barrow had five who gave $5,000. Doyle had two. Doyle had 34 contributors who gave the smallest amount required to be reported—$101. Barrow had none of those. His total number of monetary contributions was 150. Hers was 318.
Barrow's supporters include some big names in Georgia politics that he included on his endorsement lists. Doyle's supporters include some well-known trial and appellate lawyers in the state: Marietta plaintiffs attorney Lance Cooper—who gave $7,000, as did his wife and his law firm—plus Malone Law Office, the firm of Tommy and Adam Malone.
Both candidates said they are seeking broad support. Barrow noted his reputation in Congress for bipartisan alliances. Doyle noted the nonpartisan requirements of the election and the work of Georgia judges.
Both candidates point to their experience. Barrow said he has made his living practicing law in Athens for 23 years in addition to serving in Congress and before that the Athens-Clarke County Commission. Doyle has been an intermediate appellate court judge for 10 years. She practiced law for 14 years before that, half the time in a small firm and the rest in a big one.
Diversity may also be a subject of discussion in the campaign. Barrow said he would bring geographic diversity to the high court, which he said has no members who come from east of Interstate 75 and north of Interstate 16—the northeast quadrant of the state. If Doyle were elected, the nine-member court would have two women. The other is Justice Sarah Warren. Neither of them would change the racial makeup of the court, which without Benham will be all white except for Chief Justice Harold Melton.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Georgia Republicans Push to Limit Lawsuits. But Would That Keep Insurance Rates From Rising? Georgia Republicans Push to Limit Lawsuits. But Would That Keep Insurance Rates From Rising?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/dailyreportonline/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2021/02/Georgia-State-Capitol-Building-Article-202102261106.jpg)
Georgia Republicans Push to Limit Lawsuits. But Would That Keep Insurance Rates From Rising?
5 minute read![A Plan Is Brewing to Limit Big-Dollar Suits in Georgia—and Lawyers Have Mixed Feelings A Plan Is Brewing to Limit Big-Dollar Suits in Georgia—and Lawyers Have Mixed Feelings](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/dailyreportonline/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2021/09/Brian-Kemp-03-767x633.jpg)
A Plan Is Brewing to Limit Big-Dollar Suits in Georgia—and Lawyers Have Mixed Feelings
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gertrude Stein Is Right On Again
- 2Georgia's Next Judge? Sole Candidate Shortlisted to Rise to Bench
- 3The End of Innocence? DEP’s End Run Around ‘All Appropriate Inquiry’ Spill Act Protections
- 4Pistachio Giant Wonderful Files Trademark Suit Against Canadian Maker of Wonderspread
- 5New York State Authorizes Stand-Alone Business Interruption Insurance Policies
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250