How Two Candidates for Georgia Supreme Court Differ on Approach to Election
Former Rep. John Barrow, D-Georgia, has twice released long lists of backers, many of whom, but not all, are stalwart Democrats, while Georgia Court of Appeals Judge Sara Doyle said doing the same for her would be inappropriate for her in her current job.
September 04, 2019 at 06:53 PM
4 minute read
The two announced candidates for an opening on the Georgia Supreme Court next year had taken different approaches to running for the job thus far.
Athens lawyer and former Rep. John Barrow, D-Georgia, and Georgia Court of Appeals Judge Sara Doyle are already campaigning for election in May 2020 to the seat that will be opened by Justice Robert Benham's planned retirement in December.
Barrow has twice released long lists of backers, many of whom, but not all, are stalwart Democrats, while Doyle said doing the same for her would be inappropriate in her current job.
Barrow said he would release lists by regions. The first, for metro Atlanta, included former Gov. Roy Barnes, the last Democrat to hold that office, former Rep. Buddy Darden, D-Georgia, of Pope McGlamry and former Atlanta Mayor and Rep. Andrew Young, D-Georgia. That list contained 170 names. The second list contained 200 names from around Georgia.
"I'm grateful for the support of these leaders all across the state," Barrow said in a news release with the list. "What they tell me is that they want the kind of balance that I bring to the Court. We need someone who understands the issues that matter to real people in the real world."
Doyle has refrained from publicly naming supporters because of her current job. She said she wouldn't want to name as supporters lawyers arguing before her on the Court of Appeals.
"I think it's awkward for me as a sitting judge," Doyle said. "It puts lawyers in an awkward position."
Doyle said she has used names of supporters on social media posts when they've hosted fundraising events. And of course the campaign finance reports provide the names of supporters for both candidates.
In the first reporting period that ended June 30, Barrow reported $304,100 raised, and Doyle reported $223,470.
Their reports show Barrow had more big donors and Doyle had more total contributors thus far. Barrow had 17 backers who gave the limit—$7,000. Doyle had five of those. Barrow had five who gave $5,000. Doyle had two. Doyle had 34 contributors who gave the smallest amount required to be reported—$101. Barrow had none of those. His total number of monetary contributions was 150. Hers was 318.
Barrow's supporters include some big names in Georgia politics that he included on his endorsement lists. Doyle's supporters include some well-known trial and appellate lawyers in the state: Marietta plaintiffs attorney Lance Cooper—who gave $7,000, as did his wife and his law firm—plus Malone Law Office, the firm of Tommy and Adam Malone.
Both candidates said they are seeking broad support. Barrow noted his reputation in Congress for bipartisan alliances. Doyle noted the nonpartisan requirements of the election and the work of Georgia judges.
Both candidates point to their experience. Barrow said he has made his living practicing law in Athens for 23 years in addition to serving in Congress and before that the Athens-Clarke County Commission. Doyle has been an intermediate appellate court judge for 10 years. She practiced law for 14 years before that, half the time in a small firm and the rest in a big one.
Diversity may also be a subject of discussion in the campaign. Barrow said he would bring geographic diversity to the high court, which he said has no members who come from east of Interstate 75 and north of Interstate 16—the northeast quadrant of the state. If Doyle were elected, the nine-member court would have two women. The other is Justice Sarah Warren. Neither of them would change the racial makeup of the court, which without Benham will be all white except for Chief Justice Harold Melton.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A 58-Year-Old Engine That Needs an Overhaul': Judge Wants Traffic Law Amended
3 minute readAppeals Court Removes Fulton DA From Georgia Election Case Against Trump, Others
6 minute readFamily of 'Cop City' Activist Killed by Ga. Troopers Files Federal Lawsuit
5 minute readFulton Judge Rejects Attempt by Trump Campaign Lawyer to Invalidate Guilty Plea in Georgia Election Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250