New Judge Tells Georgia Courts Journal Why He's Leaving Big Law
Jones Day partner and newly confirmed Georgia Business Court Judge Walt Davis talked about his career change and his plans for the work ahead in this month's Georgia Courts Journal.
September 05, 2019 at 02:42 PM
3 minute read
Jones Day partner and newly confirmed Georgia Business Court Judge Walt Davis talked about his career change and his plans for the work ahead in this month's Georgia Courts Journal.
"To make sure lawyers and businesses know about the new court, Davis is planning to travel the state to educate folks about the importance of the business court and how it will work," the journal's Aimee Maxwell wrote. "He plans to continue this commitment to all of Georgia by 'riding the circuit' to hear cases. Making himself available to litigants throughout the state, Davis hopes to build trust in the court."
Davis told Maxwell, "When they realize the court is designed to be accessible and responsive, hopefully we will see more people using it."
Davis will start his new job Jan. 1. Meanwhile, he will spend the rest of the year wrapping up his complex business litigation practice and his responsibilities as administrative partner in Jones Day's Atlanta office. Maxwell noted that Davis has frequently practiced in the Delaware Court of Chancery. She said he is "well versed in the workings of the country's premiere business court and the value of a specialized court to hear complex corporate cases."
"The decision to take the helm of the Business Court was not a decision Davis made lightly," Maxwell wrote. She said Davis told her he never aspired to be a judge and doesn't really know what it's going to be like.
"I like the relationship aspect of my practice, and I really enjoyed counseling clients. It's going to be hard not to be an advocate," Davis told Maxwell. "A big firm is communal. You do not do your work alone. I currently work with a terrific team and have other lawyers willing to brainstorm ideas with me. I feel certain I will miss that collaboration."
Maxwell asked Davis why he would leave Big Law to take on an uncertain challenge.
"It's a once-in-a-career opportunity. I knew I would regret it if I turned it down," Davis replied. He added, "I like that my kids will know me not just as a practicing lawyer but as a public servant and a member of the judiciary. Some things are worth sacrificing for."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSanctions Order Over Toyota's Failure to Provide English Translations of Documents Vacated by Appeals Court
4 minute readBurr & Forman, Smith Gambrell & Russell Promote More to Partner This Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Quiet Revolution: Private Equity’s Push Into Law Firms
- 2Restoring Trust in the Courts Starts in New York
- 3'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 4Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 5Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250