Gwinnett Judge Kathryn Schrader Indicted on Computer Trespass Charges
Superior Court Judge Kathryn Schrader has been indicted for allegedly allowing a convicted child molester to access her court computer.
September 18, 2019 at 11:54 AM
4 minute read
Gwinnett County Superior Court Judge Kathryn Schrader was indicted Wednesday by a grand jury on three counts of computer trespass for allegedly hiring a private investigator to monitor her court computer, which she suspected was hacked by District Attorney Danny Porter.
Also indicted were the private investigator, T.J. Ward, and two computer specialists: convicted child molester Ed Kramer and forensic investigator Frank Karic.
The indictment was presented by a special prosecutor, Prosecuting Attorneys' Council of Georgia general counsel Robert Smith Jr. after Porter recused.
It was a complaint from Porter that launched a Georgia Bureau of Investigation probe into Schrader's use of the investigators after she allegedly allowed them to access the county's computer system.
Schrader stopped hearing criminal cases in May, and her criminal caseload has been assumed by appointed judges.
The indictments handed down Wednesday said Schrader and her three co-defendants "knowingly use[d] a computer network without authority and with the intent to interfere with the use of the Gwinnett County Justice Center computer network" without authority and "with the intent to alter the computer network" in violation of Georgia's computer trespass statute.
Gwinnett Superior Court Senior Judge Donald Sweat signed bench warrants for the arrest of all four defendants. Schrader was ordered released on her own recognizance, while Ward and Karic were granted $25,000 bonds. Sweat declined to grant bond for Kramer.
Schrader is represented by B.J. Bernstein of Palmetto's Bernstein Firm.
"Judge Schrader has spent her career pursuing justice as an attorney and as a Judge," Bernstein said in a statement. "She believes in the justice system and knows from her years of experience the presumption of innocence is real and necessary because she's seen the innocent needing a trial to undo an allegation. Standing unfairly accused she will rely on her deep faith, family and her belief in justice to defend herself."
Ward's attorney, Snellville solo Michael Puglise, said his client would fight the charges, which he said were baseless.
"Mr. Ward has served his community and profession well, and his reputation speaks volumes," said Puglise. "We're prepared to defend these charges, which are completely without foundation. Mr. Ward maintains his innocence; he was given proper authority to perform his services by the judge, who possessed that authority."
The Daily Report is attempting to contact the lawyers for Kramer and Karic.
Porter said he could not comment on the case, from which he has recused, as he is likely to be called as a witness.
The case began in February when Schrader contacted Ward to look into whether Porter had hacked her computer.
Ward allegedly had Karic install a device called a WireShark on Schrader's computer to monitor activity on the computer network. Kramer, who co-founded Dragon Con and was later convicted of child molestation, was allegedly hired to analyze the findings.
Porter, who denied hacking the judge's computer, asked the GBI to investigate the possible breach of the county's computer system when apprised of the monitoring. He also recused from the investigation into Schrader's activities, and filed a motion asking her to recuse from any cases his office is prosecuting.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia Appeals Court Cancels Hearing in Election Interference Case Against Trump
3 minute readJustice Department Says Fulton County Jail Conditions Violate Detainee Rights
6 minute readSupreme Court Rejects Push to Move Georgia Case Against Ex-Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows
3 minute read3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Dog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
- 2Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
- 3Plaintiff Gets $500K Policy Limit Without Surgery
- 4Philadelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
- 5SEC Chair Gary Gensler to Resign on Trump's Inauguration Day
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250