The Case for Presuit and Early Mediation
Especially in a presuit posture, one needs to demonstrate having a command of the law, facts, medicine, experts and venue.
September 23, 2019 at 11:00 AM
6 minute read
Where resolution should always be the ultimate goal, early or presuit mediation may serve a vital role as a vehicle for exploring settlement in high stakes cases such as medical malpractice and nursing home litigation, where protracted costs can be avoided by all parties.
Regardless of when a case is mediated, even jaded skeptics should come to the negotiation table with a plan and pathway toward resolution, especially when such an outcome seems unlikely. Often the process of mediation causes shifts in strategy by one or more parties. When those parties, who never contemplated seeing things differently, do not have a plan to move forward, mediations stall out. Fortunately, even in those situations, the mediation process usually provides a strong foundation of trust which may allow the neutral to capitalize on continued settlement negotiations further down the road.
While the individual methodologies may be as unique as the personalities involved, there are three basis tenets on which one can build a successful platform to explore resolution at an early mediation. They can be summarized as follows: Evaluate, Elucidate, and Elevate.
Evaluate Your Case And Benefits to Quiet Discretion Thoroughly
Early mediation does not mean less preparation. In fact, your work may be as hard or harder than preparing a case already on a trial calendar. The most effective presentations at mediation are the ones which show a thoughtful and thorough attention to detail. Especially in a presuit posture, one needs to demonstrate having a command of the law, facts, medicine, experts and venue.
Even before the advent of the internet, when gossip was just spread by word of mouth, keeping unflattering news private had a certain intrinsic value for those who might otherwise appear negatively. With hindsight, most people come to the realization that they should have talked directly to the person with whom they had a beef instead of blasting scathing opinions against their perceived foes on social media.
Similarly, with increasingly sophisticated commercial defense clients, there is often interest in keeping litigation out of the public record. Cases utilizing presuit mediation may benefit from the privacy afforded parties in that forum by way of incentives which translate into larger settlement offers. Therefore, it is important to evaluate when keeping things private adds case value.
Sometimes all the relevant facts and issues about a case are known before the expiration of the statute of limitations. Consequently, it may be a great opportunity to explore early mediation. Having most facts alone is not enough, however, as the manner with which you proceed can have tremendous effect on how your case is valued from all sides.
Elucidate Your Opponents and Elevate Yourself
What does a presuit mediation need to look like? If you're dealing with high stakes litigation, more often than not you are dealing with a decedent. A common refrain heard in these big cases is the mantra, "I don't want to show my hand and let them cure whatever holes I point out." This is a valid and honest concern, but the reply is to show one's opponent the things that cannot change and enlighten all sides as to their true exposure so the defense can evaluate a case properly. In other words, you have to give up information in order to get what you ultimately want.
High stakes cases, from a defense perspective, bring the following important people into play: named partners, senior associates, seasoned claims professionals or in-house general counsel and corporate executives from the C-suite. When one's case draws talented and sophisticated defense counsel and claims professionals, it is necessary for the plaintiff to educate everyone as to a case's strengths. The defense also benefits from seeing and hearing the plaintiff's side speak. That subtle reveal of counsel's charisma or a plaintiff's appealable personality may make a defendant rethink their trial strategy.
The same is true from the defense perspective. If defense counsel displays confidence and being well-versed on the issues and ready to challenge the allegations, one may give the plaintiff's team some pause. Additionally, early mediation provides a "taste" of the adversarial nature of protracted litigation. It is invaluable for plaintiff's counsel to learn her client lacks the resolve for trial. Similarly, when tried and true defenses are aired for peer review, by way of the mediator, defense counsel may learn that some arguments may not be as potent in front of a jury as perceived in the war room.
For plaintiffs, consider a presentation to show the "value" of that person's life with family photos, testimonials and with some family members present to tell a decedent's story. Done correctly, these can be powerful aids in telling one's story. Additionally, provide recent verdict and settlement data in the jurisdiction where suit will be filed. Note any outliers about specific counties.
In one high stakes mediation I handled, the national claims counsel scoffed at my suggestion the plaintiff's case had greater value in DeKalb County, Georgia. She opined that it could not be as liberal a venue as a borough in New York. Having never practiced in the Big Apple, I simply shrugged my shoulders and gently urged her to check with her vast network. When I returned to her caucus room, she exclaimed that her colleagues confirmed my information. That new discovery led to the case getting resolved at mediation.
The moral of the story is that one has to sometimes adopt the old adage, "help me help you," by narrowing and clarifying the issues in a clear and concise manner. This becomes even more paramount when one's case involves decision makers who are flying to Atlanta from other cities. The more sophisticated the defense client, the more sophisticated your presuit presentation may need to be to reveal both one's legal acumen and one's showmanship before a jury. Additionally, early mediation provides a forum for the defense to demonstrate their abilities such that it allows a plaintiff's attorney to better estimate her client's resolve.
Gregory J. Parent is a team leader at Miles Mediation, Atlanta. He has worked as a claims adjuster, a defense attorney and a plaintiffs attorney.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCFPB Proposes Rule to Regulate Data Brokers Selling Sensitive Information
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250