The Case for Presuit and Early Mediation
Especially in a presuit posture, one needs to demonstrate having a command of the law, facts, medicine, experts and venue.
September 23, 2019 at 11:00 AM
6 minute read
Where resolution should always be the ultimate goal, early or presuit mediation may serve a vital role as a vehicle for exploring settlement in high stakes cases such as medical malpractice and nursing home litigation, where protracted costs can be avoided by all parties.
Regardless of when a case is mediated, even jaded skeptics should come to the negotiation table with a plan and pathway toward resolution, especially when such an outcome seems unlikely. Often the process of mediation causes shifts in strategy by one or more parties. When those parties, who never contemplated seeing things differently, do not have a plan to move forward, mediations stall out. Fortunately, even in those situations, the mediation process usually provides a strong foundation of trust which may allow the neutral to capitalize on continued settlement negotiations further down the road.
While the individual methodologies may be as unique as the personalities involved, there are three basis tenets on which one can build a successful platform to explore resolution at an early mediation. They can be summarized as follows: Evaluate, Elucidate, and Elevate.
Evaluate Your Case And Benefits to Quiet Discretion Thoroughly
Early mediation does not mean less preparation. In fact, your work may be as hard or harder than preparing a case already on a trial calendar. The most effective presentations at mediation are the ones which show a thoughtful and thorough attention to detail. Especially in a presuit posture, one needs to demonstrate having a command of the law, facts, medicine, experts and venue.
Even before the advent of the internet, when gossip was just spread by word of mouth, keeping unflattering news private had a certain intrinsic value for those who might otherwise appear negatively. With hindsight, most people come to the realization that they should have talked directly to the person with whom they had a beef instead of blasting scathing opinions against their perceived foes on social media.
Similarly, with increasingly sophisticated commercial defense clients, there is often interest in keeping litigation out of the public record. Cases utilizing presuit mediation may benefit from the privacy afforded parties in that forum by way of incentives which translate into larger settlement offers. Therefore, it is important to evaluate when keeping things private adds case value.
Sometimes all the relevant facts and issues about a case are known before the expiration of the statute of limitations. Consequently, it may be a great opportunity to explore early mediation. Having most facts alone is not enough, however, as the manner with which you proceed can have tremendous effect on how your case is valued from all sides.
Elucidate Your Opponents and Elevate Yourself
What does a presuit mediation need to look like? If you're dealing with high stakes litigation, more often than not you are dealing with a decedent. A common refrain heard in these big cases is the mantra, "I don't want to show my hand and let them cure whatever holes I point out." This is a valid and honest concern, but the reply is to show one's opponent the things that cannot change and enlighten all sides as to their true exposure so the defense can evaluate a case properly. In other words, you have to give up information in order to get what you ultimately want.
High stakes cases, from a defense perspective, bring the following important people into play: named partners, senior associates, seasoned claims professionals or in-house general counsel and corporate executives from the C-suite. When one's case draws talented and sophisticated defense counsel and claims professionals, it is necessary for the plaintiff to educate everyone as to a case's strengths. The defense also benefits from seeing and hearing the plaintiff's side speak. That subtle reveal of counsel's charisma or a plaintiff's appealable personality may make a defendant rethink their trial strategy.
The same is true from the defense perspective. If defense counsel displays confidence and being well-versed on the issues and ready to challenge the allegations, one may give the plaintiff's team some pause. Additionally, early mediation provides a "taste" of the adversarial nature of protracted litigation. It is invaluable for plaintiff's counsel to learn her client lacks the resolve for trial. Similarly, when tried and true defenses are aired for peer review, by way of the mediator, defense counsel may learn that some arguments may not be as potent in front of a jury as perceived in the war room.
For plaintiffs, consider a presentation to show the "value" of that person's life with family photos, testimonials and with some family members present to tell a decedent's story. Done correctly, these can be powerful aids in telling one's story. Additionally, provide recent verdict and settlement data in the jurisdiction where suit will be filed. Note any outliers about specific counties.
In one high stakes mediation I handled, the national claims counsel scoffed at my suggestion the plaintiff's case had greater value in DeKalb County, Georgia. She opined that it could not be as liberal a venue as a borough in New York. Having never practiced in the Big Apple, I simply shrugged my shoulders and gently urged her to check with her vast network. When I returned to her caucus room, she exclaimed that her colleagues confirmed my information. That new discovery led to the case getting resolved at mediation.
The moral of the story is that one has to sometimes adopt the old adage, "help me help you," by narrowing and clarifying the issues in a clear and concise manner. This becomes even more paramount when one's case involves decision makers who are flying to Atlanta from other cities. The more sophisticated the defense client, the more sophisticated your presuit presentation may need to be to reveal both one's legal acumen and one's showmanship before a jury. Additionally, early mediation provides a forum for the defense to demonstrate their abilities such that it allows a plaintiff's attorney to better estimate her client's resolve.
Gregory J. Parent is a team leader at Miles Mediation, Atlanta. He has worked as a claims adjuster, a defense attorney and a plaintiffs attorney.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBusiness Breakups: Why Business and Commercial Cases Are Well-Suited to Mediation
5 minute readIn RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
Trending Stories
- 1Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 2Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
- 3'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
- 4Class Action Filed Against Houston Health Savings Account Firm for Allegedly Confiscating Client Funds
- 5These 2 Lawyers Just Became Florida Judges
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250