How a Losing Argument Sparked a Dialogue With a Federal Judge
Baker & Hostetler's Derek Bauer and District Judge Steve Jones of the Northern District of Georgia engaged in a back-and-forth argument that was more debate than questioning.
September 25, 2019 at 12:59 PM
4 minute read
Baker & Hostetler's Derek Bauer did his best Monday to get his client dismissed from a federal lawsuit over Georgia's new law against abortion.
He lost. But the effort provided some of the liveliest debate in a two-hour hearing Monday before Judge Steve Jones of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
Bauer is representing DeKalb County District Attorney Sherry Boston, one of many defendants in the suit—a constitutional challenge to House Bill 481, which the state calls "the Living Infants Fairness and Equality Act."
As Bauer pointed out in briefing and in oral argument, Boston has said publicly and repeatedly that she would not enforce the new law to prosecute women or their doctors. She said the law restricting abortion early in pregnancy violates women's rights to privacy and U.S. Supreme Court precedent, which allows for the procedure up until viability, when a baby could survive after birth with medical care.
Essentially, Boston and the plaintiffs are on the same side, Bauer told the judge. But they differ on whether to enjoin prosecutors from enforcing the law. And that was the point of Monday's hearing.
"There has to be a credible threat," Bauer told the judge. Since no such threat of prosecution under the new law exists in DeKalb County, Boston shouldn't remain as a defendant in the case, he argued.
Jones had questions. The first one surprisingly involved longtime Georgia Sen. Johnny Isakson's planned retirement at the end of the year, leaving his job open for the governor to fill.
"What if tomorrow Gov. Kemp calls Sherry Boston and says, 'I want you to be the next United States senator from Georgia.' And she says 'yes,'" Jones asked. "The governor would appoint a new DeKalb DA, and couldn't that DA prosecute?"
"Then they'd have somebody to sue," Bauer replied. "But they don't now."
Bauer added he thinks it's "highly improbable that the governor calls Sherry Boston" for the U.S. Senate job. He's a Republican. She's a Democrat.
"I don't get involved in politics," Jones answered.
But that wasn't the judge's only issue with the argument.
"I have great respect for Sherry Boston," Jones said. "But the district attorney has no authority to decide what the law is."
Bauer wasn't giving up.
"She has absolute charge discretion on who she is going to prosecute," Bauer replied. "The irony here is we want the plaintiffs to win. We're in this case clearly as a pretext to get into the U.S. Supreme Court."
Bauer reminded Jones of his own time as an assistant district attorney in Athens, and the discretion he had as a prosecutor.
But Jones was unmoved.
"I also said I would enforce the law, whether it liked it or I didn't like it," Jones said. "I have great respect for all the prosecutors in the state. They don't get to decide what laws they enforce and what laws they don't enforce."
Bauer and Jones continued with a back-and-forth argument that was more debate than questioning.
The bottom line was Bauer asserted that enjoining prosecutors from enforcing laws sets a dangerous precedent that is "ripe for abuse."
"You shouldn't be manipulated," Bauer told the judge.
And Bauer sent a broader message.
"If people want to do these procedures in the Stone Mountain Judicial Circuit, you are free to do it right now," Bauer said. "There is no threat the DA will prosecute."
Bauer also told the judge that, "if my client is still in this case by this afternoon, I will be filing a motion to dismiss."
She was, and he is.
In the action, SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective and numerous others have sued Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, Attorney General Chris Carr and numerous prosecutors. The state law at issue bans abortion upon detection of an embryonic pulse, which can be as early as six weeks into pregnancy, and carries criminal penalties. The governor signed the bill into law on May 7. The law is set to take effect Jan. 1.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Court Rejects Plaintiff's Attempt to Amend Claims Against Weapons Manufacturer
Trending Stories
- 1Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 2Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 3Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
- 4Burr & Forman, Smith Gambrell & Russell Promote More to Partner This Year
- 5Sanctions Order Over Toyota's Failure to Provide English Translations of Documents Vacated by Appeals Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250