On Oct. 2, the Daily Report online ran an article on “How Dressing Lawyerly Changed Between 1995 and 2019.” This article had one glaring omission: women.

Despite not being described as how “men’s” or “male” lawyerly dressing has changed, the article went on to address only the professional attire of men, with absolutely no mention of the existence of women lawyers, much less changes in dress. This oversight is exemplified by the article’s mention of ties, local men’s stores and how the popular “unshaven look” is not appropriate for those reading the article.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]