First Georgia Talcum Powder Trial Against Johnson & Johnson Ends in Mistrial
On its third day of deliberations, the jury was deadlocked 10 to 2 in favor of the plaintiff, said one of the lawyers for Diane Brower's family. The trial alleged Johnson & Johnson's baby powder caused Brower's 2016 death from ovarian cancer.
October 08, 2019 at 05:06 PM
3 minute read
The first talcum powder trial in Georgia ended in a mistrial on Tuesday after the jury was deadlocked 10 to 2.
On its third day of deliberations, a jury in Fulton County State Court failed to reach a verdict in a case alleging Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder products caused a woman to die of ovarian cancer in 2016. Juries in Georgia have to reach unanimous verdicts in civil cases.
In a statement, plaintiffs attorney Ted Meadows of Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles in Montgomery, Alabama, called the trial's conclusion "unfortunate."
"The parties were told that the jury was divided 10-2 in favor of the plaintiff," he wrote. "Scientific studies and internal company documents show the liability of Johnson & Johnson and the link of baby powder use to ovarian cancer. We will continue to move forward with these important claims on behalf of ovarian cancer victims in venues across the nation."
Johnson & Johnson spokeswoman Jennifer Taylor wrote in a statement: "We sympathize with anyone suffering from cancer, and we understand patients and their families are seeking answers. We are grateful to the jury for their time and believe this outcome reflects the diligent review by the jurors of the facts in this case. We look forward to a new trial to present our defense, which rests on decades of independent, non-litigation driven scientific evaluations, none of which have found that Johnson's baby powder causes cancer."
Meadows and Allen Smith, of The Smith Law Firm in Ridgeland, Mississippi, represented the granddaughter and estate of Diane Brower, who claimed to have applied Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder products on her vaginal area for more than 15 years before stopping around 1980.
The trial began on Sept. 12. In closing arguments last week, Smith asked the jury to award more than $700,000 in lost wages and $1.3 million in medical bills, plus noneconomic damages for the 20 years she should have lived. Defense attorney James Smith of Blank Rome in Philadelphia attacked the plaintiffs' experts, calling their theories "junk science."
Meadows paired with Smith on several ovarian cancer trials in Missouri, one of which ended in a $4.7 billion verdict for 22 women last year.
Joining them on the plaintiff's team were Beasley Allen shareholders Leigh O'Dell, who is co-lead plaintiffs' counsel in the related multidistrict litigation against Johnson & Johnson in New Jersey, and Sharon Zinns and Robert Register, both of the Atlanta office. Jack Dodson of Nashville's Dickinson Wright, and Alexander Denton of Atlanta's The Robbins Firm, also worked on the case.
The defense team also included Sidley Austin's Debra Pole and Eric Schwartz, both in Los Angeles; Mark Hegarty at Shook, Hardy & Bacon in Kansas City, Missouri; and Thompson Hine's Z. Ileana Martinez and Leslie Suson, both in Atlanta. Pole, Smith and Hegarty have faced off against the same plaintiffs team before in Missouri talc trials.
Mistrials have been common in related cases alleging Johnson & Johnson's baby powder caused mesothelioma, while ovarian cancer cases have largely ended in substantial verdict awards, some of which have been reversed.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A 58-Year-Old Engine That Needs an Overhaul': Judge Wants Traffic Law Amended
3 minute readFulton Jury Returns Defense Verdict After Pedestrian Killed by MARTA Bus
8 minute read'The Best Strategy': $795K Resolution Reached in Federal COVID-Accommodation Dispute
8 minute readPopulation and Caseload Boom Birth New West Georgia Judicial Circuit
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250