Henry County Jury Returns $3M Verdict for Injured Trucker
To decide the case, the jurors had to learn what a "toter truck" is and why it blows out so many tires. They apportioned 10% of the fault to driver who broke his back changing a flat and 90% to the company that owns the truck.
October 28, 2019 at 10:40 AM
4 minute read
A Henry County State Court jury returned a $3 million verdict Thursday evening in the case of a truck driver who broke his back in a fall at work.
The jury apportioned 10% of the fault to the driver—58-year-old Tony Jewell of Pearson, Georgia—and 90% to Bennett Truck Transport.
Bennett transports factory built housing and modular buildings throughout North America, with a network of more than 30 terminals providing deliveries to 48 states and 11 Canadian provinces, according to the company website. The company has a registered agent in Henry County.
Drivers deliver the modular or mobile homes and buildings on what they call "toter trucks," which they lease from the company, according to court records. Jewell had been driving a Bennett toter truck for more than a year when he fell off of it in October 2015.
He was at a truck stop in Louisiana attempting to change a tire—a common task for toter truck drivers, who must contend with frequent flats because of the heavy loads they carry. The company estimated he had done the same thing at least 50 times over that previous year. But this time, after he picked up the 45-pound spare from the bed of the truck and turned to remove it, he fell backward and hit the ground. He fractured a vertebra, had surgery, still suffers pain and likely will never be able to go back to his $80,000-a-year trucking job, his lawyers said.
Jewell's lawyers told the jury that he had asked repeatedly for the company to install a tire rack on the outside of his truck so he wouldn't have to keep climbing into the bed to retrieve spares.
The company disputed that claim. Bennett's lawyers argued that Jewell could have installed a tire rack himself if he had wanted one in the truck he rented. They also said he was a contractor, not an employee, who assumed the risk of the work. The defense also faulted the morning dew—of which Jewell would have been aware—and his own admission in a deposition that he must have used "too much force" when he picked up the tire.
Bennett was defended by Teddy Sutherland of Scrudder, Bass, Quillian, Horlock, Taylor & Lazarus in Atlanta and Rod Meadows of Meadows Macie & Sutton in Stockbridge.
"Bennett was surprised and disappointed with the verdict given that it promoted safety standards and a safety culture exceeding the requirements of the law. Oddly enough, these internal standards and culture formed the primary legal basis for plaintiff's claims," Sutherland said by email Saturday. "We also respectfully disagree with the Court's denial of the company's motions for summary judgment and for directed verdict. We believe the use of the company's internal, aspirational standards to create a heightened duty beyond ordinary care and the denial of these motions give the company several strong grounds for an appeal, which we certainly plan to file."
Sutherland added, "Having said that, I would emphasize that Plaintiff's counsel and Judge Blount were all extremely professional, courteous, and diligent throughout this litigation."
Meadows agreed, saying in an email, "In my humble opinion, the use of heightened aspirations of a company as a basis for a claim of negligence cries out for the attention of the appellate courts."
Jewell was represented by Brent Savage Jr. and Zachary Sprouse of Savage, Turner, Durham, Pinckney & Savage in Savannah and Andrew Gebhardt of Smith, Welch, Webb & White in Stockbridge. Sprouse said Friday that their opponents were "cordial, fair and above board." He added, though, that the trial had some "contentious moments"—particularly with regard to whether Jewell was responsible for his own injury.
"He didn't assume a risk. He didn't really have a choice. It was his job," Sprouse said. "I think the jury got it."
Sprouse said the jurors deliberated for about two hours before reaching the verdict. The case was tried before Judge Ernest Blount.
The judge had denied a defense motion for summary judgment. Jewell's lawyers had made a $1.25 million settlement demand. But Sprouse said the best—and only—settlement offer from the defense was $10,000.
The case is Tony Jewell v. Bennett Truck Transport, No. 18-SV-132-EDB.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAtlanta Attorneys Rely on Google Earth, YouTube for Evidence in $6M Faulty Guardrail Settlement
Fowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute read'A Fierce Battle of Expert Witnesses' Expected in Cybersecurity Spat
Former UPS Workers Lodge Discrimination Suit for 'Systemic Racial Bias' in Workplace Culture
Trending Stories
- 1Roberts Calls Court's Relationship With Congress 'Strained.' Who's to Blame?
- 2Class Certification, Cash-Sweep Cases Among Securities Litigation Trends to Watch in 2025
- 3Buchanan Ingersoll Launches in Chicago With 17-Lawyer Team From Locke Lord
- 4$2M Settlement for Woman Struck by New Jersey Transit Bus
- 5'The Most Viable Solution': Donald Trump to Face Sentencing on January 10, Judge Rules
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250