Pass Rates Jumped Across the Board for Georgia Bar Exam
The University of Georgia School of Law led the pack for the sixth year in a row, with a first-time pass rate of 93.7% for the July 2019 bar exam.
October 29, 2019 at 05:57 PM
4 minute read
In good news for both Georgia Bar Exam applicants and the state's law schools, the pass rate for the July exam increased across the board, according to results released Tuesday by the Georgia Office of Bar Admissions.
The overall pass rate for all 1,283 test-takers jumped to 65.8%, a notable increase from 61.2% for the July 2018 exam. The pass rate for first-time test-takers was even higher at 79.6%, up from 72.9% the prior year, and the pass rates at all five Georgia law schools increased significantly. (Even the pass rate for repeaters increased 6.5 points to 25%.)
The University of Georgia School of Law led the pack for the sixth year in a row with a 93.7% pass rate for first-time test-takers. That's a 5.6 point jump from UGA Law's 88.1% first-timer pass rate in July 2018–and it's the first time since July 2015 that a Georgia law school's pass rate for initial exam-takers surpassed the 90th percentile for the summer bar exam.
The law schools at Georgia State University and Emory University were in a virtual tie for the No. 2 spot. GSU Law's pass rate for first-timers was 87.6% (up from 85.4% last year) and Emory Law was just behind at 87.4% (up from 84.8%).
Mercer University Law School achieved a significant increase in its first-timer pass rate, up to 81.3% from 73.3% the previous year.
John Marshall Law School and its affiliate, Savannah Law School, which have lower numbers of test-takers, scored the biggest percentage point gains for first-timers. The pass rate at John Marshall was 66.3%, up from 40.4% the year before, while at Savannah Law it was 50%, up from 35.7%.
"The [Georgia] schools have been working really hard. We are hopeful that this is now a new upward trend," said Heidi Faenza, the director of the Georgia Office of Bar Admissions, noting that bar exam pass rates also have increased nationally.
The overall increase in the pass rate at Georgia's ABA-approved schools was 84.1%, up a full nine points from 75.1% for the July 2018 exam.
|Law School Efforts
Declines in bar exam pass rates have been a national issue for the past few years, and the overall pass rate for last summer's Georgia bar exam had dropped after a slight increase in July 2017. The pass rate before the declines started, for Georgia's July 2012 exam, was 79.7% overall and 85.3% for first-time test-takers.
In response to the declines, Georgia law schools have focused on spotting at-risk exam-takers as early as their first year and have been offering test preparation programs and coursework aimed at increasing their students' success in passing the exam.
UGA Law Dean Bo Rutledge recognized his law school's efforts toward that end. "I'd like to thank the law school's Bar Passage Working Group—led by Bar Exam Success Programming Director Tony Waller—and our Bar Exam Success Team (BEST) for their innovative work in this field," Rutledge said in an announcement. "Special thanks also go to the law school's generous alumni and alumnae who invested in a bar preparation stipend program, run by Tony and the BEST team, to support those in need."
For Georgia bar exam-takers, Faenza said, performance improved for both the MultiState Bar Examination, which counts for half the exam score, and the Georgia-specific essay questions.
The mean scaled MBE score for Georgia law schools was 141.9, a bit higher than the national mean of 141.1, according to a September report from the National Conference of Bar Examiners. The national figure increased 1.6 points from the July 2018 national mean score of 139.5, which Faenza said was a 34-year low.
"We're very pleased with the results, and we hope it's a trend not only in Georgia, but nationwide," Faenza said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Rebound' In Demand For Legal Services Places Southeast Among Top 3 Regions In U.S.
4 minute readMaryland Atty Pushes Judge to Grant Discovery in Reverse Discrimination Suit Against King & Spalding
4 minute readHow Big Law Congressional Investigation Practices Will Stay Busy in 2025
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250