Appeals Court Reboots Legal Challenge to Funding for Plant Vogtle
The Court of Appeals partly reversed a Fulton County judge's dismissal of a challenging to funding for the nuclear project, ruling that she must thoroughly analyze whether petitioners must wait for it to be completed before they can object.
October 30, 2019 at 03:51 PM
3 minute read
The Georgia Court of Appeals revived a challenge to continued funding for Georgia Power Co.'s two new reactors at Plant Vogtle, ruling a trial judge must determine whether allowing the project—already billions of dollars over budget—to be completed before a court can weigh in would result in "irreparable harm" to the plaintiffs.
Estimates for the costs of the project to be prepaid by ratepayers was initially set at $5.8 billion, but have continued to grow. In 2017, during a semi-annual review, the Public Service Commission voted to allow the costs to continue to be added to customers' bills and to decide when it was finished whether the increases were "prudent."
Georgia Watch, Georgia Interfaith Power & Light and Partnership for Southern Equity filed petitions for judicial review of the decision but last year Fulton Superior Court Judge Shawn LaGrua dismissed them, ruling the state Administrative Procedures Act barred any court challenge to an agency's ruling other than a "final order."
In a footnote, she also ruled the plaintiffs argument that an exception to the act for cases where delay would not provide an adequate remedy did not apply.
On Tuesday, an opinion written by Judge Brian Rickman with the concurrence of Presiding Judge M. Yvette Miller and Judge Clyde Reese, said LaGrua's ruling on the APA was correct.
But it said her footnote was unclear as to whether and why she "determined that this was the type of case where the lack of adequate remedy exception" was applicable. The panel instructed her to "analyze whether the appellants met their burden to show that review of the PSC's final order would not provide them an adequate remedy," it said.
"We're glad to have another day in court to show that the commission's decision to continue Plant Vogtle despite dramatic changes to the cost and schedule and increased risk to customers was rushed and procedurally improper," said SELC senior attorney Kurt Ebersbach in a statement.
"We believe the decision by the Georgia PSC to continue the Vogtle project was well within its authority and complied with all applicable rules and laws," said GPC spokesman John Kraft. "Additionally, Georgia Power filed a motion to dismiss the appeals because we believe that the [2017] order is not appealable at this time."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Lawsuit Alleges Delayed Elections for Ga. PSC Are Unconstitutional
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250