Appeals Court Reboots Legal Challenge to Funding for Plant Vogtle
The Court of Appeals partly reversed a Fulton County judge's dismissal of a challenging to funding for the nuclear project, ruling that she must thoroughly analyze whether petitioners must wait for it to be completed before they can object.
October 30, 2019 at 03:51 PM
3 minute read
The Georgia Court of Appeals revived a challenge to continued funding for Georgia Power Co.'s two new reactors at Plant Vogtle, ruling a trial judge must determine whether allowing the project—already billions of dollars over budget—to be completed before a court can weigh in would result in "irreparable harm" to the plaintiffs.
Estimates for the costs of the project to be prepaid by ratepayers was initially set at $5.8 billion, but have continued to grow. In 2017, during a semi-annual review, the Public Service Commission voted to allow the costs to continue to be added to customers' bills and to decide when it was finished whether the increases were "prudent."
Georgia Watch, Georgia Interfaith Power & Light and Partnership for Southern Equity filed petitions for judicial review of the decision but last year Fulton Superior Court Judge Shawn LaGrua dismissed them, ruling the state Administrative Procedures Act barred any court challenge to an agency's ruling other than a "final order."
In a footnote, she also ruled the plaintiffs argument that an exception to the act for cases where delay would not provide an adequate remedy did not apply.
On Tuesday, an opinion written by Judge Brian Rickman with the concurrence of Presiding Judge M. Yvette Miller and Judge Clyde Reese, said LaGrua's ruling on the APA was correct.
But it said her footnote was unclear as to whether and why she "determined that this was the type of case where the lack of adequate remedy exception" was applicable. The panel instructed her to "analyze whether the appellants met their burden to show that review of the PSC's final order would not provide them an adequate remedy," it said.
"We're glad to have another day in court to show that the commission's decision to continue Plant Vogtle despite dramatic changes to the cost and schedule and increased risk to customers was rushed and procedurally improper," said SELC senior attorney Kurt Ebersbach in a statement.
"We believe the decision by the Georgia PSC to continue the Vogtle project was well within its authority and complied with all applicable rules and laws," said GPC spokesman John Kraft. "Additionally, Georgia Power filed a motion to dismiss the appeals because we believe that the [2017] order is not appealable at this time."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Lawsuit Alleges Delayed Elections for Ga. PSC Are Unconstitutional
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250