Judge Charged With Computer Trespass Challenges Her Indictment as 'Fatally Defective'
Attorney B.J. Bernstein said the felony indictment accusing suspended Gwinnett County Superior Court Judge Kathryn Schrader of three counts of computer trespass fails to offer any "sufficient allegation of a crime" and that if the judge were to admit to the acts outlined in the indictment as allegedly criminal she could "still be innocent."
November 06, 2019 at 05:00 PM
3 minute read
Suspended Gwinnett County Superior Court Judge Kathryn Schrader's defense attorney is challenging the judge's felony indictment, calling it "fatally defective."
Attorney B.J. Bernstein said the felony indictment accusing Schrader of three counts of computer trespass fails to offer any "sufficient allegation of a crime" and that, if the judge were to admit to the acts outlined in the indictment as allegedly criminal she could "still be innocent."
As a sitting superior court judge, Schrader and her staff legally had authority to access the Gwinnett County justice system's computer network in "fulfilling the job of her elective office," Bernstein argued in a demurrer filed in advance of a pretrial hearing scheduled for Thursday.
"The indictment does not address how she did not have authority [to] access the computer network," she said.
The lawyer also contended the indictment fails to specify how Schrader allegedly intended to interfere with or alter the computer network.
"The indictment must sufficiently apprise the defendant of what she must be prepared to meet," Bernstein said. "This indictment does not do that."
Bernstein declined to comment on the pleading.
Schrader has pleaded not guilty to the charges. So have three co-defendants Schrader allegedly hired to monitor her court computer over fears that it had been hacked by Gwinnett County District Attorney Danny Porter.
T.J. Ward, a private investigator; Frank Karic, a forensic computer investigator; and Ed Kramer, a convicted child molester and co-founder of Dragon Con—an annual computer gaming, fantasy and science fiction convention—also have pleaded not guilty.
According to pleadings filed in the case, Ward had a technician install a device on the judge's computer that monitors network activity. Kramer was given the task of monitoring and analyzing the data collected by the device, and allegedly "discovered clear signs" that someone was accessing Schrader's computer outside regular business hours without the judge's consent.
But before Schrader could take the information to law enforcement, Porter signed a warrant for Kramer's arrest on an unrelated charge, according to one motion filed in the case. A search of Kramer's electronic equipment, including his computer and cell phone, led to the GBI investigation that soon included Schrader, that motion said.
Last month, the state Judicial Qualifications Commission, which oversees judicial discipline, suspended Schrader until the charges are resolved or her judicial term expires. In doing so, the judicial watchdog agency said Schrader is accused of "allegedly enabled a convicted child molester to have access to court data." Kramer is on probation stemming from his 2013 no contest plea to three counts of child molestation.
Schrader stopped hearing criminal cases last March after Porter called in the Georgia Bureau of Investigation over a possible breach of the court computer system and soon sought the judge's recusal in hundreds of cases his office is prosecuting. Porter has denied hacking the judges computer, and later recused from the investigation. Robert Smith, general counsel for the Prosecuting Attorneys' Council of Georgia, is prosecuting the case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn the Move: Hunton Andrews Kurth Practice Leader Named Charlotte Managing Partner
6 minute readPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
Atlanta Attorneys Rely on Google Earth, YouTube for Evidence in $6M Faulty Guardrail Settlement
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250