'Eggshell Plaintiff' Nets $430K Jury Award After Insurer Snubbed $64K Settlement
The insurer, Farm Bureau, also rejected a high-low during trial.
November 08, 2019 at 06:50 PM
5 minute read
A relatively minor wreck in Eastman where both parties drove their vehicles from the scene ballooned into a jury verdict and judgment for nearly $430,000, including $31,000 in attorney fees and expenses awarded post-trial.
Dublin solo C. Mitchell Warnock said the "classic eggshell plaintiff case" could have been settled pretrial for $64,000, but the defendant driver's insurer, Farm Bureau, refused.
The defendant driver is represented by William Noland and Virginia Josey of Macon's Noland Law Firm.
Noland said Warnock "tried a great case."
"I appreciate Mitch's skill and professionalism. We are still weighing our options in regard to post-trial remedies," he said via email.
According to Warnock and court filings, his client, Tommy Hogue, was 62 years old and had some medical problems including hypertension, osteoarthritis in his shoulder, and required dialysis.
Hogue was driving his Toyota Tundra pickup through Eastman in 2016, traveling behind a GMC Acadia SUV driven by Catherine Harrington.
Harrington pulled into a left-turn lane and Hogue continued straight, and was beside the SUV when it suddenly turned right and he hit it, Warnock said.
"She claimed she had to swing wide to make the turn," Warnock said. "My client maintained his lane and was able to get beside her when she turned in front of him. We had a witness who also thought she was turning left."
Harrington was cited at the scene and both drivers left, he said.
"There was not much damage to the vehicles at all," Warnock said.
Hogue experienced immediate pain in his left shoulder and was ultimately found to have a torn rotator cuff, Warnock said. Hogue's claimed medical expenses at trial topped $15,000.
Hogue and his wife sued Harrington in Dodge County Superior Court.
"There was a $250,000 policy," Warnock said. "We made a policy-limit demand at first, then later on made an offer of judgment for $64,000."
"Their best offer was $28,5000 before trial, and $35,000 during trial," he said. "We offered a high-low during trial, but they said no."
During a two-day trial before Judge Howard Kaufold Jr., Warnock said the defense insisted that Hogue was at least partly at fault for the wreck. The defense portion of the pretrial order indicated that issues included contributory negligence and whether all of Hogue's claimed medical expenses were related to the wreck.
"They disputed liability all the way," Warnock said. "It was clear the defendant was at fault, but they put all their eggs in the liability basket."
After two days of trial, the jury retired to deliberate, and Warnock said there was more than a little drama.
After less than three hours, the panel sent out a note saying they were hung and needed a break, "so they took a break and had a smoke."
After another hour or so, they again said they were hung, and Kaufold issued an Allen or "dynamite" charge urging them to keep working.
"So he sent them home about 5:45 and they came back the next morning and started at 9, and about 9:45 they had a verdict," Warnock said.
When the jury came in and handed over the verdict, they had written that they found for the plaintiff, but that Hogue was responsible for 15% of the liability.
But the second page, where the amounts for damages were to be listed, was blank.
Kaufold excuse the jury and asked the lawyers what they wanted to do.
"I objected to the verdict form," Warnock said. "The defense got excited and said they didn't mean to give us any money."
The judge called the jury back in and instructed then to either award dollar figures or write in zero, he said, and they again retired.
"In about seven minutes they were asking for a calculator, and in about 20 minutes they had their verdict," he said.
The jury awarded $476,924 in damages to Hogue and his wife. After reducing it by 15%, the total was $397,735.
Warnock said they parties then started wrangling over the attorney fees he was entitled to seek under Georgia's offer of settlement statute because the defense turned down the $64,000 offer.
"They knew attorney fees were going to be awarded; we arrived at $31,000 as somewhat of a compromise," Warnock said. "We wanted to get the judgment filed and entered."
On Oct. 20, a judgment order was entered that, after additional costs and expenses were added, totaled $429,355.
"That was pretty big verdict for a case like this in little old Dodge County," Warnock said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A 58-Year-Old Engine That Needs an Overhaul': Judge Wants Traffic Law Amended
3 minute readFulton Jury Returns Defense Verdict After Pedestrian Killed by MARTA Bus
8 minute read'The Best Strategy': $795K Resolution Reached in Federal COVID-Accommodation Dispute
8 minute readPopulation and Caseload Boom Birth New West Georgia Judicial Circuit
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250