'Not Very Sexy' Title Dispute Ends With $4.5M Check
"I'm more happy about the results for the client," said Bryan Knight of Knight Palmer, who along with Sherri Buda represented RM Kids. "They actually stood up to the insurance company where many people would have bowed out years ago."
November 08, 2019 at 11:58 AM
4 minute read
A nine-year litigation battle over a title insurance claim that the lead lawyer described as "not very sexy" has finally concluded in a way that made him happy nonetheless—with a $4.5 million payment.
"I'm more happy about the results for the client," said Bryan Knight of Knight Palmer, who along with Sherri Buda represented a real estate investment group called RM Kids. "They actually stood up to the insurance company where many people would have bowed out years ago."
At the heart of the case was an oil spill from the 1990s that contaminated the land and groundwater in the area off Ga. 316 near Sugarloaf Parkway in Gwinnett County—which in that era had become known as the fastest growing suburb in the country.
In 2007, a deal was made by a developer to buy 151 acres there for $11.4 million, with plans for a residential subdivision. Peachtree Bank provided the loan, then later sold the loan to Knight's client.
"After they bought the note, it became apparent there was a title defect," Knight said. "The defect became known in the years of litigation that followed as Exhibit C, which was a document disclosing the oil spill. It required 'notice to all subsequent landowners' of petroleum contamination from an underground pipeline affecting groundwater and surface water. The damage has been mediated and monitored since and will require continued monitoring, according to the document. Restrictions include but are not limited to 'drinking, bathing, cleaning, irrigation or installation of wells.'"
The original lender's real estate closing attorney left Exhibit C out of the paperwork. He later blamed the omission on his paralegal. But they were not the defendants. The defendant was Old Republic National Title Insurance Co., which declined to cover the defect.
In 2010, RM Kids sued Old Republic over the omission, alleging it amounted to a title defect.
In 2015, RM Kids won a $7.1 million verdict based on the difference between the land value with and without contamination. Old Republic appealed. The Georgia Court of Appeals reversed on an issue of first impression, ruling that the value of the property had to be set as of the date of foreclosure, which was at a post-recession low in 2012, not the date of the sale, which was in 2007, before the real estate bubble burst.
In 2018, the case was tried again, this time with a $4.2 million verdict. Old Republic appealed again, saying the judge should have granted the defense a directed verdict.
In October, the Court of Appeals issued another opinion, this time affirming the verdict.
"We conclude that the easements and restrictions constituted defects in title that are covered by the policy, and there was sufficient evidence to establish damages," Judge Todd Markle wrote for a panel that included Presiding Judge Sara Doyle and Judge Chris Coomer. "The trial court properly denied the motion for directed verdict."
Gwinnett County Superior Court Judge Tom Davis, now retired, heard the case the first time. Magistrate Judge Robert Walker presided over the second trial.
Last week, Knight said, Old Republic paid RM Kids the full amount of the verdict plus $300,000 in post-judgment interest, for a total of $4.5 million.
Old Republic was represented by William Brown of Heyman & Sizemore along with Ed Wasmuch Jr. and Ed Burch Jr., both of Smith, Gambrell & Russell. They did not have an immediate comment.
"At the end of the day, Old Republic should be very happy with their counsel," Knight said. "They were able to reduce the amount they owed by $3 million and hold the money for nine years. They probably made more from investing it than they paid."
Knight had an extra reason to celebrate—thanks to a gamble he made along the way.
"I typically do most of my cases on hourly. I did the first trial hourly. But it took my clients five years to get a trial," Knight said. Then the verdict was overturned. RM Kids were tapped.
"They came to me and said, 'Do you want to take the second trial on contingency?'" Knight said.
His answer?
"Yeah, let's do it."
Knight wouldn't disclose the percentage of his contingency agreement. But he did have this to say about the story's conclusion: "I feel pretty good about it."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readJudge Orders Stop to Referendum in Coastal Ga. Slave Descendants' Zoning Battle
5 minute readBitter Fight Between 2 Tribes Over Sacred Land Where One Built a Casino
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Section 1782 Practice Pointers From Recent Decisions
- 2Democratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
- 3Decision of the Day: Split Circuit Panel Bars Enforcement of Ivory Law's 'Display Restriction' on Antique Group Members
- 4Chiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
- 52 Years After Paul Plevin Merger, Quarles & Brady’s Revenue Up More than 13%
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250