Lawyers Remember Judge Conley Ingram for 'Easy Southern Charm' in Court
On the bench, Ingram was so charming that sometimes it was difficult for litigants to realize when they'd lost. "Both sides would think they'd won," recalled Cobb Superior Court Judge Robert E. Flournoy III. "He just granted summary judgment against you but he did it in such a way that you'd say, 'That's nice of you.'"
November 12, 2019 at 09:57 PM
6 minute read
Conley Ingram is being remembered as a judge who made people feel good about what happened in court—even when they lost.
Ingram, a retired senior judge on the Cobb County Superior Court and a former justice on the Georgia Supreme Court, died Monday at his home in Marietta at the age of 89.
"The entire Cobb bench and bar is saddened by the loss of one of the best judges to ever serve in Cobb County," Cobb Superior Court Chief Judge Reuben M. Green said Tuesday in an email. "Judge Conley Ingram was the epitome of what a judge should be: humble, kind, patient and fair to all who appeared before him. He was the judge the rest of us wanted to emulate. He will be sorely missed by all who knew him."
Ingram was born Sept. 27, 1930. He attended law school at Emory University. He practiced privately in Marietta before becoming a judge. He served on the Cobb Juvenile Court, the Cobb Superior Court and the Supreme Court of Georgia, where he was a justice from 1973 to 1977. He left the high court to become a partner at the Atlanta law firm Alston & Bird, where he worked for 21 years. In 1998, he retired from the firm to become a senior judge in Cobb Superior Court, where he served until he retired in September of this year.
"To me, Judge Ingram was an icon, a giant in small stature," Cobb Superior Court Judge C. LaTain Kell said. "But more than that, he was one of the kindest gentlemen I have had the privilege of knowing in the practice of law. When I first came on the bench, he would drop by at least weekly to check on me, offering assistance, encouragement and friendship. Cobb County and the State of Georgia will miss him, and I personally will miss him greatly."
Two of the lawyers Ingram mentored were his own daughters: Cobb County Superior Court Judge S. Lark Ingram and Warner Bates appellate attorney Nancy Ingram Jordan, a former prosecutor in the Cobb County District Attorney's Office. Ingram and his wife of 67 years, Sylvia Ingram, also have a son, Conley Ingram IV.
"I grew up down the street from Judge Ingram and his wonderful family," Cobb Superior Court Judge Gregory Poole said. "In all the years I knew him, in the courtroom and out, he exhibited a keen intellect, a love of the law, and an easy Southern charm. I will miss him dearly."
On the bench, Ingram was so charming that sometimes it was difficult for litigants to realize when they'd lost.
"Both sides would think they'd won," recalled Cobb Superior Court Judge Robert E. Flournoy III. "He just granted summary judgment against you but he did it in such a way that you'd say, 'That's nice of you.'"
One of the lawyers who had to break such bad news to clients on occasion was Flournoy's father, the late Cobb Superior Court Judge Robert E. Flournoy Jr., who practiced law with Ingram before they both became judges. But Ingram became a judge years before Flournoy Jr.
"Dad said his clients would say, 'I do believe that Judge Ingram would have ruled for us, but the law wouldn't let him do it," Flournoy III recalled.
Flournoy III said he knew why Ingram decided to leave the bench and return to private practice. "He needed to make more money," Flournoy said. "He had three children in college—two in law school."
But the financial considerations weren't the only ones that led Ingram to become one of the few high court justices to step down before either reaching retirement age or completing service as the court's chief. Ingram told a reporter a decade ago that he felt lonely cloistered at the Supreme Court, rarely seeing anyone from the outside.
Superior Court was different.
"He really did enjoy being a trial court judge where human beings came in front of him every day," Flournoy III said. "He could help them resolve whatever difficulties they had in life."
When Ingram decided to retire from Alston & Bird at 68, he wanted to return to trial court as a senior judge. But he couldn't do it. The law required 10 years of experience either on a superior court or an appellate court. Ingram had served four-year stints on juvenile, superior and supreme courts but not 10 years on any one of them.
So the Georgia General Assembly passed a special law changing those requirements to 10 years of total service as a judge. The legislators called it the Conley Ingram bill. The year it became law, Ingram became a senior judge, substituting when needed on the superior court.
Because he served so long, Ingram developed relationships with lawyers over multiple generations.
"My first interaction with Judge Conley Ingram was during a temporary protective order hearing about 10 years ago," Cobb Judicial Circuit District Attorney Joyette Holmes said by email Tuesday. "I was a private attorney representing a young lady seeking protection. Judge Ingram made a frightening experience for my client one where she knew she was heard and could walk away with a measure of relief."
Holmes became an admirer after that. "From that day forward, my interactions with Judge Ingram have always been wonderful," she said. "We have lost a giant—a giant for his family, for this state and for the legal profession."
Criminal defense attorney and Cobb County Bar Association past president H. Maddox Kilgore of Kilgore & Rodriguez in Marietta said walking into a courtroom to find Ingram on the bench was "like winning the judge lottery."
"As a lawyer, you knew that you were going to get a fair hearing, no matter the issue," Kilgore said. "And you knew that he would speak to the lawyers and parties with a calm, respectful demeanor, which just made the courtroom anxiety melt away. No doubt Judge Ingram had the spiritual gift of a peacemaker. In the midst of the chaos and drama of the courtroom, he simply made everyone feel comfortable. He was truly a gift to our community."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWho Got the Work: 16 Lawyers Appointed to BioLab Class Action Litigation
4 minute read'Possible Harm'?: Winston & Strawn Will Appeal Unfavorable Ruling in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1AI: An Enhancement, Not a Replacement for Attorneys
- 2Fowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
- 3Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
- 4'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
- 5Call for Nominations: TLI's Pennsylvania Legal Awards 2025
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250