State Appellate Courts Packing Up for 'Historic' Move
The halls of the Georgia Supreme Court and Court of Appeals are now outfitted with packing materials and boxes as movers prepare to take the justices, judges and their staffs to the new $131 million judicial building.
November 19, 2019 at 11:49 AM
5 minute read
The state's appellate courts are packing up for the move to the nearly finished Nathan Deal Judicial Center, named for the former governor who appropriated $131 million for the design and building of the project.
Construction started in August 2017. The six-story building was topped out a year ago. Both courts are set to move in December.
"We're up to our eyeballs in packing materials and crates," said Georgia Court of Appeals Clerk Steve E. Castlen. "We're excited about this incredible, historic move, and we're working to make this thing go as smoothly as possible."
Court of Appeals fiscal director Jan Kelley said the project has been part of the strategic plan since 2008. The project's lead architect, Bill Clark of Stevens & Wilkinson, told the Daily Report at the topping-out ceremony that he has been talking with state officials and thinking about the design for 20 years.
The Georgia Supreme Court will move in first. The nine justices and their staff members have a deadline of Dec. 5 to be packed. They will move starting the next day and continuing over the following weekend, according to public information officer Jane Hansen. The high court will be closed the following Monday, then open for business starting Dec. 10 in the new building at 330 Capitol Ave. S.E.
The justices held their last oral arguments in the old judicial building across the street from the Capitol on Nov. 7. On that day, Chief Justice Harold Melton paid tribute to the place that has been the high court's home since 1956.
"To this old building, we are grateful," Melton said. "It has done its job. It has served us well."
Plans call for renovation of the old building for the continued use of the state law department, which now occupies part of that location and others adjacent.
The justices next oral arguments on Jan. 14 are scheduled to be held in their top floor courtroom of the new building. Their chambers will be on the fifth floor.
The $131 million total appropriated for the new judicial center includes: $7.5 million for design in 2015, $6.5 million in 2016 for demolition of the Georgia Archives building that was previously on the site, $3.5 million from the 2017 supplemental budget for site cleanup, $105 million in construction bonds sold in 2017, and $8.5 million set aside in 2018 for furniture, fixtures and equipment, based on disclosures from state officials over the past four years.
A status report the Georgia State Financing and Investment Commission shared with the Daily Report Monday shows $109.5 million already expended and the rest remaining to be used. The bulk of the cost is for construction—nearly $112 million. The general contractor is Gilbane. The second-largest budget item is for architectural design—$9 million.
The high court also passed an order saying its case-management technology will be transferred to the new building this month, requiring a four-day shutdown of the Supreme Court e-filing docket.
"To accommodate this move the SCED system will not be available from 12:00 a.m. on November 21, 2019, until 8:00 a.m. on November 25, 2019," the order said. "During this period, members of the bar will be unable to electronically file or view documents, view the docket, or use any of the functions of the Court's SCED system. Members of the public will be unable to view the docket on the Supreme Court website, and although the Clerk's office will remain open, the public and pro se parties will not have access to electronic records." The order also reset filing deadlines that fall on Nov. 21 or Nov. 22 to Nov. 25.
The 15-member Court of Appeals and its larger staff of 112 plus interns will move after the Supreme Court, Castlen said.
The Court of Appeals has already moved part of its information technology staff to the new building and so will keep operating in both places until the move is complete, probably in January, according to Casten, although the clerk was careful not to give too exact a schedule.
"I'm a retired Army colonel. I was a JAG officer. In 30 years in the military, my wife and I moved 20 times. There's been a lot of moving in my life," Castlen said. He said he has told his staff, "No plan survives contact with the enemy. And we're expecting Murphy to show up." He cited Murphy's Law: If anything can go wrong, it will.
Castlen said the move is "a complete upheaval of everything" in a building that has been the court's home for more than 50 years. But he said the staff has reduced the burden significantly in recent years anticipating the move, by scanning historic records and documents into computer files and recycling thousands of pages of paper.
Both appellate court clerks' offices will be on the first floor of the new building. The Court of Appeals judges will have chambers on the third and fourth floors—all near each other for the first time. Their courtroom will be on the second floor, Castlen said.
"Now we have judges spread out over different floors and buildings. Some of the offices are not nice. They're awful," Castlen said. "It's overwhelming how great this new building is."
Asked about his tips for transition from his years of military experience, Castlen said, "Enjoy the move. Recognize its historic importance. And help each other in the process."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia Supreme Court Honoring Troutman Pepper Partner, Former Chief Justice
2 minute read'A 58-Year-Old Engine That Needs an Overhaul': Judge Wants Traffic Law Amended
3 minute readAppeals Court Removes Fulton DA From Georgia Election Case Against Trump, Others
6 minute readFamily of 'Cop City' Activist Killed by Ga. Troopers Files Federal Lawsuit
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Conference Declines Democratic Request to Refer Justice Thomas to DOJ
- 2People in the News—Jan. 2, 2025—Eastburn and Gray, Klehr Harrison
- 3Deal Watch: Latham, Paul Weiss, Debevoise Land on Year-End Big Deals. Plus, Mixed Messages for 2025 M&A
- 4Bathroom Recording Leads to Lawyer's Disbarment: Disciplinary Roundup
- 5Conn. Supreme Court: Workers' Comp Insurance Cancellations Must Be Unambiguous
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250