Southern Law Departments Sharply Increased Spend on Alternative Service Providers
In survey results released this month, Southern-based companies reported a 43% increase in spending on outside legal service providers, such as ALSPs, but only a minor increase in spending on outside counsel.
November 21, 2019 at 05:13 PM
4 minute read
Law department leaders at large Southern-based companies are significantly increasing their spending on outside legal services providers beyond law firms to cope with higher internal demand for legal services, even as their budgets remain relatively flat.
That was one of the most significant findings of HBR Consulting's annual Law Department Survey. Of 207 large companies nationally, 26 were based in the South, which included Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Tennessee and North Carolina, plus Texas and Oklahoma. HBR advises both law firms and corporate law departments.
The Southern-based companies reported a 43% increase in spending on outside legal service providers in 2018 over the prior year—well above the 11% increase nationally, which was itself a big jump. That includes alternative legal service providers, or ALPS—such as the Big Four accounting firms, suppliers of contract lawyers and ediscovery vendors—as well as traditional outside vendors such as court reporters and expert witnesses.
That compared with only a 1% increase in spending on outside counsel for respondents in the South—and a 3% increase nationally.
Meanwhile, 92% of the Southern law departments said they expect their companies' legal needs to increase, which is even higher than the 88% of legal departments nationally—even as law department budgets remained relatively flat. Total legal spending, both in the South and nationally, rose only 2% in 2018.
A recent Altman Weil survey of corporate legal departments similarly reported budget constraints. Only 40% of law departments surveyed nationally said their budgets increased this year, down from 53% of respondents with budget increases in 2018, according to the legal consultancy's Chief Legal Officer Survey.
For HBR's law department survey, 65% of participating companies nationally are Fortune 500. The Southern-based companies were slightly smaller than their national counterparts, with median revenue of $9.1 billion and 9,800 employees, compared with $10.5 billion in median revenue and 15,000 employees for companies nationally. Their law departments employed a median of 22 lawyers with a $28.2 million legal spend, which compared nationally with a median law department head count of 29 lawyers and a $33.7 million legal spend.
"Law departments are looking at new and alternative ways to address growing legal demand," said Lauren Chung, an HBR managing director who has led the Law Department Survey since its inception 16 years ago.
Unsurprisingly, cost control remains a top priority for Southern law departments, with 57% of respondents citing it as their No.1 challenge. (That compared with 51% of respondents nationally). For the Southern cohort, managing outside counsel was the next-biggest challenge, cited by 44% of respondents, followed by using systems and technology (32%).
Turning to ALSPs tracks with in-house counsels' focus on cutting costs and improving efficiency when they are tasked with providing more legal services within roughly the same budgets, Chung said.
Many Southern law department leaders are also focusing on process improvement and increasing internal staffing, according to the HBR survey. The top efforts that respondents cited for handling increased demand were: increasing the workload of existing legal resources (57%), improving work processes (49%) and increasing the number of in-house lawyers (43%). While 43% of respondents in the South said they're hiring more lawyers in-house to manage demand increases, respondents nationally instead said they've chosen to redistribute work.
Southern law departments also plan to increase their technology use in the next two years, the survey found. Chung said they've laid the foundations, noting that 100% of respondents in the South reported they have electronic billing technology in place, compared with only 84% nationally, and 83% have implemented matter management, compared with 76% nationally.
Now these law departments are focusing on emerging legal technologies, Chung said.
Looking ahead, 50% of Southern law departments said they plan to deploy artificial intelligence (AI) for work processes over the next two years, while 32% plan to incorporate e-Signature technology and 28% plan to use a contract life cycle management system.
|Read More:
Majority of General Counsel Believe a Recession Is Coming in the Next 2 Years
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBurr & Forman, Smith Gambrell & Russell Promote More to Partner This Year
7 minute readFew Atlanta-Centric Law Firms Expected to Pay Associate Bonuses at Market Scale
5 minute readExperts Not Foreseeing More Rules Governing Prosecutors' Actions After Georgia Court's Removal of DA From Election Case
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Akin Promotes Record Number of Lawyers to Partner
- 2Ogletree Deakins Names 5 New Office Managing Shareholders
- 3Six Judges Take Up New Leadership Roles in NYC Courts
- 4Carlos Ortiz Retiring After 35-Year Run as GC of Goya Foods
- 5'There's a Ticking Clock in This Case': Giuliani Held in Contempt in Defamation Enforcement Litigation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250