Southern Law Departments Sharply Increased Spend on Alternative Service Providers
In survey results released this month, Southern-based companies reported a 43% increase in spending on outside legal service providers, such as ALSPs, but only a minor increase in spending on outside counsel.
November 21, 2019 at 05:13 PM
4 minute read
Law department leaders at large Southern-based companies are significantly increasing their spending on outside legal services providers beyond law firms to cope with higher internal demand for legal services, even as their budgets remain relatively flat.
That was one of the most significant findings of HBR Consulting's annual Law Department Survey. Of 207 large companies nationally, 26 were based in the South, which included Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Tennessee and North Carolina, plus Texas and Oklahoma. HBR advises both law firms and corporate law departments.
The Southern-based companies reported a 43% increase in spending on outside legal service providers in 2018 over the prior year—well above the 11% increase nationally, which was itself a big jump. That includes alternative legal service providers, or ALPS—such as the Big Four accounting firms, suppliers of contract lawyers and ediscovery vendors—as well as traditional outside vendors such as court reporters and expert witnesses.
That compared with only a 1% increase in spending on outside counsel for respondents in the South—and a 3% increase nationally.
Meanwhile, 92% of the Southern law departments said they expect their companies' legal needs to increase, which is even higher than the 88% of legal departments nationally—even as law department budgets remained relatively flat. Total legal spending, both in the South and nationally, rose only 2% in 2018.
A recent Altman Weil survey of corporate legal departments similarly reported budget constraints. Only 40% of law departments surveyed nationally said their budgets increased this year, down from 53% of respondents with budget increases in 2018, according to the legal consultancy's Chief Legal Officer Survey.
For HBR's law department survey, 65% of participating companies nationally are Fortune 500. The Southern-based companies were slightly smaller than their national counterparts, with median revenue of $9.1 billion and 9,800 employees, compared with $10.5 billion in median revenue and 15,000 employees for companies nationally. Their law departments employed a median of 22 lawyers with a $28.2 million legal spend, which compared nationally with a median law department head count of 29 lawyers and a $33.7 million legal spend.
"Law departments are looking at new and alternative ways to address growing legal demand," said Lauren Chung, an HBR managing director who has led the Law Department Survey since its inception 16 years ago.
Unsurprisingly, cost control remains a top priority for Southern law departments, with 57% of respondents citing it as their No.1 challenge. (That compared with 51% of respondents nationally). For the Southern cohort, managing outside counsel was the next-biggest challenge, cited by 44% of respondents, followed by using systems and technology (32%).
Turning to ALSPs tracks with in-house counsels' focus on cutting costs and improving efficiency when they are tasked with providing more legal services within roughly the same budgets, Chung said.
Many Southern law department leaders are also focusing on process improvement and increasing internal staffing, according to the HBR survey. The top efforts that respondents cited for handling increased demand were: increasing the workload of existing legal resources (57%), improving work processes (49%) and increasing the number of in-house lawyers (43%). While 43% of respondents in the South said they're hiring more lawyers in-house to manage demand increases, respondents nationally instead said they've chosen to redistribute work.
Southern law departments also plan to increase their technology use in the next two years, the survey found. Chung said they've laid the foundations, noting that 100% of respondents in the South reported they have electronic billing technology in place, compared with only 84% nationally, and 83% have implemented matter management, compared with 76% nationally.
Now these law departments are focusing on emerging legal technologies, Chung said.
Looking ahead, 50% of Southern law departments said they plan to deploy artificial intelligence (AI) for work processes over the next two years, while 32% plan to incorporate e-Signature technology and 28% plan to use a contract life cycle management system.
Read More:
Majority of General Counsel Believe a Recession Is Coming in the Next 2 Years
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia Justices Urged to Revive Malpractice Suit Against Retired Barnes & Thornburg Atty
4 minute read28 Firms Supporting Retired Barnes & Thornburg Litigator in Georgia Supreme Court Malpractice Case
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250