Fulton Court Clerk Fires Back at Chief Magistrate in Legal Wrangle
After Fulton Chief Magistrate Cassandra Kirk sued Superior and Magistrate Court Clerk Tina Robinson last month, saying she is not following Kirk's directions. Robinson responded that she is not legally bound to do so.
December 11, 2019 at 06:00 PM
5 minute read
Fulton County Superior Court Clerk Cathelene "Tina" Robinson has fired back at a lawsuit filed by Fulton County Chief Magistrate Cassandra Kirk in a fight over court resources.
In a response and answer to Kirk's mandamus action Wednesday, Robinson argued there are no legal grounds for the chief magistrate's demands. Robinson added that, if Kirk doesn't like the arrangement, she should take it up with the county commission that appointed Robinson.
In a statement regarding the filing, Robinson described the litigation as "a black eye for the court, the county and the citizens that we were elected to serve."
But, she said, "I also understand that as an elected official, I cannot and will not act under the unreasonable demands of one person, especially when their vision does not align with what is best for all stakeholders."
Robinson said she was "deeply disappointed by the position that my colleague and I have found ourselves in and am saddened by the irrational course of action that she has taken" in filing the lawsuit.
In an emailed response Wednesday, Kirk countered that the lawsuit "is about Fulton County residents and court users having the most efficient experience possible in the busiest Magistrate Court in Georgia."
"Currently, the limited resources of the court, coupled with a non-compliant appointed clerk, present significant obstacles," she said.
"Since 2017, I have attempted to increase innovation, efficiency and user accessibility," said Kirk. "Those efforts are being severely hampered by the appointed clerk and create adverse effects for those seeking remedy through the court. Fulton County deserves better."
When asked if she went to the Fulton County Commission about rescinding Robinson's appointment, Kirk said, "Short answer, yes."
Kirk's dissatisfaction with Robinson came to light nearly two years after Robinson assumed the duties—as well as more than $2.3 million in funding and staff that went with it—of magistrate court clerk in 2016.
But in April 2019, Kirk wrote Robinson a letter requesting that she relinquish all staff and resources associated with that court's clerical duties, along with a slate of other requests regarding staffing and other matters.
Kirk's letter cites state law giving a chief magistrate the authority to assign the court clerk's duties.
Kirk also sought and received permission for the county to hire outside legal counsel, telling the Daily Report at the time that she wanted assistance with the magistrate court's "consistent issue of being underfunded and short-staffed."
According to Robinson's lawyer, George Lawson of Lawson & Thornton, there were two mediations, but Kirk and Robinson were unable to settle the dispute.
In November, Kirk filed a mandamus petition in Fulton Superior Court accusing Robinson of ignoring her written directions concerning the assignment of clerical staff, creation of a separate budget and "[r]emoving 'Superior Court Clerk' branding, logos and references from all Magistrate Court Clerk's office signage," among others.
The petition, filed by Bondurant Mixson & Elmore partner John Rains IV, said state law provides that Robinson's duties "exclusively consist of those assigned to her" by Kirk.
"Months have elapsed and [Robinson] has steadfastly refused to perform these duties," it said.
Rains declined to discuss the case.
The response Lawson filed on Robinson's behalf argued that Kirk has no supervisory authority because Robinson was appointed by the county commission and that the "alleged duties" the petition seeks to enforce are "not 'official' duties that are required" by law and thus not subject to enforcement by a writ of mandamus.
Kirk "has another specific legal remedy: to wit, the Fulton County Board of Commissioners in the exercise of their authority can be petitioned to appoint a new chief clerk … who may then work under the supervision of the petitioner."
In an interview, Lawson said Kirk's demands "are not statutory things Tina has to do as clerk. Judge Kirk keeps citing the statute saying 'the duties of the clerk shall be assigned by the chief magistrate,' but we're saying that's not applicable unless she appointed the clerk.
"The other thing is, even if that were true, the duties she's talking about are discretionary, so [Kirk] can't tell her how to do them."
The Fulton bench recused, and the case has been assigned to Cobb County Superior Court Senior Judge Grant Brantley.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia's Governor Details Spending Plans but Not His Top Priority of Lawsuit Reform
6 minute readFourth Circuit Seeks More Legal Briefs in Unresolved N.C. Supreme Court Election
4 minute readFulton DA Seeks to Overturn Her Disqualification From Trump Georgia Election Case
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Class Action Accusing Dave's Killer Bread of Mislabeling Protein Contents Cleared to Continue, Judge Rules
- 2SEC Files Lawsuit Against Elon Musk Over Untimely Twitter Ownership Disclosure
- 3Survey Finds Majority of Legal Professionals Still Intimidated by AI Despite Need to Streamline Mounting Caseloads
- 4FTC Launches Inquiry of Single-Family Rental Home 'Mega Investors,' Issues PBM Report
- 5Womble Bond Dickinson's Wilmington Office Sees New Leadership as Merger Is Completed
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250