Fulton Court Clerk Fires Back at Chief Magistrate in Legal Wrangle
After Fulton Chief Magistrate Cassandra Kirk sued Superior and Magistrate Court Clerk Tina Robinson last month, saying she is not following Kirk's directions. Robinson responded that she is not legally bound to do so.
December 11, 2019 at 06:00 PM
5 minute read
Fulton County Superior Court Clerk Cathelene "Tina" Robinson has fired back at a lawsuit filed by Fulton County Chief Magistrate Cassandra Kirk in a fight over court resources.
In a response and answer to Kirk's mandamus action Wednesday, Robinson argued there are no legal grounds for the chief magistrate's demands. Robinson added that, if Kirk doesn't like the arrangement, she should take it up with the county commission that appointed Robinson.
In a statement regarding the filing, Robinson described the litigation as "a black eye for the court, the county and the citizens that we were elected to serve."
But, she said, "I also understand that as an elected official, I cannot and will not act under the unreasonable demands of one person, especially when their vision does not align with what is best for all stakeholders."
Robinson said she was "deeply disappointed by the position that my colleague and I have found ourselves in and am saddened by the irrational course of action that she has taken" in filing the lawsuit.
In an emailed response Wednesday, Kirk countered that the lawsuit "is about Fulton County residents and court users having the most efficient experience possible in the busiest Magistrate Court in Georgia."
"Currently, the limited resources of the court, coupled with a non-compliant appointed clerk, present significant obstacles," she said.
"Since 2017, I have attempted to increase innovation, efficiency and user accessibility," said Kirk. "Those efforts are being severely hampered by the appointed clerk and create adverse effects for those seeking remedy through the court. Fulton County deserves better."
When asked if she went to the Fulton County Commission about rescinding Robinson's appointment, Kirk said, "Short answer, yes."
Kirk's dissatisfaction with Robinson came to light nearly two years after Robinson assumed the duties—as well as more than $2.3 million in funding and staff that went with it—of magistrate court clerk in 2016.
But in April 2019, Kirk wrote Robinson a letter requesting that she relinquish all staff and resources associated with that court's clerical duties, along with a slate of other requests regarding staffing and other matters.
Kirk's letter cites state law giving a chief magistrate the authority to assign the court clerk's duties.
Kirk also sought and received permission for the county to hire outside legal counsel, telling the Daily Report at the time that she wanted assistance with the magistrate court's "consistent issue of being underfunded and short-staffed."
According to Robinson's lawyer, George Lawson of Lawson & Thornton, there were two mediations, but Kirk and Robinson were unable to settle the dispute.
In November, Kirk filed a mandamus petition in Fulton Superior Court accusing Robinson of ignoring her written directions concerning the assignment of clerical staff, creation of a separate budget and "[r]emoving 'Superior Court Clerk' branding, logos and references from all Magistrate Court Clerk's office signage," among others.
The petition, filed by Bondurant Mixson & Elmore partner John Rains IV, said state law provides that Robinson's duties "exclusively consist of those assigned to her" by Kirk.
"Months have elapsed and [Robinson] has steadfastly refused to perform these duties," it said.
Rains declined to discuss the case.
The response Lawson filed on Robinson's behalf argued that Kirk has no supervisory authority because Robinson was appointed by the county commission and that the "alleged duties" the petition seeks to enforce are "not 'official' duties that are required" by law and thus not subject to enforcement by a writ of mandamus.
Kirk "has another specific legal remedy: to wit, the Fulton County Board of Commissioners in the exercise of their authority can be petitioned to appoint a new chief clerk … who may then work under the supervision of the petitioner."
In an interview, Lawson said Kirk's demands "are not statutory things Tina has to do as clerk. Judge Kirk keeps citing the statute saying 'the duties of the clerk shall be assigned by the chief magistrate,' but we're saying that's not applicable unless she appointed the clerk.
"The other thing is, even if that were true, the duties she's talking about are discretionary, so [Kirk] can't tell her how to do them."
The Fulton bench recused, and the case has been assigned to Cobb County Superior Court Senior Judge Grant Brantley.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia Appeals Court Cancels Hearing in Election Interference Case Against Trump
3 minute readJustice Department Says Fulton County Jail Conditions Violate Detainee Rights
6 minute readSupreme Court Rejects Push to Move Georgia Case Against Ex-Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows
3 minute read3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250