Massachusetts AG Pens Amicus Brief Supporting Objections to Equifax Settlement
A hearing to approve the $1.4 billion settlement is scheduled for Thursday.
December 18, 2019 at 02:55 PM
3 minute read
The Massachusetts attorney general is objecting to the proposed Equifax data breach settlement, calling it an "end run" by the Atlanta-based credit bureau to avoid ongoing litigation in her state.
In an amicus brief supporting other objectors to the proposed $1.4 billion settlement, Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey asked Chief Judge Thomas Thrash of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia to reject the settlement unless it's modified to ensure that Massachusetts' case against Equifax can proceed.
Healey opposes any inference that Massachusetts is bound by the proposed settlement. She cited an ongoing civil enforcement action filed in Massachusetts shortly after Equifax went public with news of the breach in September 2017.
That suit, filed in Suffolk Superior State Court, contends that Equifax's 2017 data breach imperiled the personal and financial information of an estimated 147 million consumers in violation of the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act and the states data protection law. That litigation seeks unspecified civil penalties, consumer restitution and other unspecified relief.
Equifax has unsuccessfully attempted to dismiss or stay the Massachusetts litigation, which is in discovery, according to Healey.
Healey said her office was formally notified of the proposed settlement last August. "At no point prior thereto was Massachusetts consulted, invited, or permitted to provide any input to the terms of the proposed settlement agreement," she said.
A hearing to approve the settlement and $77.5 million in legal fees requested by the consumer class counsel is set for Thursday.
Equifax co-lead counsel David Balser and Phyllis Sumner of King & Spalding in Atlanta, couldn't be reached for comment. Co-lead counsel for the consumer class—Ken Canfield of Atlanta's Doffermyre Shields Canfield & Knowles; Amy Keller of Dicello Levitt Gutzler in Chicago and Norman Siegel of Stueve Siegel Hanson in Kansas City, Missouri—also couldn't be reached.
Attorneys general in 48 states, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia as well the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau were involved in negotiations with Equifax over a proposed settlement and will collectively benefit from the final deal, Healey said.
But she said that Massachusetts or Indiana joined in that multistate agreement and played no role in negotiating its terms. Indiana Attorney General Curtis Hill filed a separate amicus brief on Dec. 5 with similar objections to the proposed settlement.
Healey said she and Hill requested that Equifax and counsel for the consumer class modify language in the proposed settlement to "make clear" it would not include their two states.
During that call, Equifax counsel "expressed an unwillingness to make the modification," Healey said.
In emails Healey's office exchanged between Nov. 15 and Dec. 4 with counsel for Equifax and the consumer class, Massachusetts again requested that they modify the release language to make clear it would not include the two states' claims, Henley said. Counsel for both Equifax and the plaintiff class refused to to do so, Healey said.
As a result, Massachusetts has been placed "in an unfair position vis-a-vis her sister states, which separately settled with [Equifax] and negotiated a separate release for their own sovereign claims," she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readJudge Sets Early 2025 Trial for Ex-Prosecutor Charged With Meddling in Ahmaud Arbery Investigation
3 minute readFulton Reelects Willis as DA Amid Ongoing 2020 Election Case Against Trump
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 2Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 3In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 4Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 5The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250