Southwire Sues Anonymous Hacker for Ransomware Attack
Mayer Brown was retained to sue a hacker who encrypted Southwire's files and then published confidential corporate information online after it refused to pay a ransom.
January 02, 2020 at 12:43 PM
4 minute read
A Georgia wire and cable manufacturer has filed a federal lawsuit in Atlanta after its confidential business information was taken and posted online in the wake of a ransomware attack.
The redacted complaint, filed Dec. 31 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, said the unknown defendant demanded several million dollars to keep the information stolen from Southwire Co. private. The alleged hacker posted the confidential information online after Southwire refused to pay.
Southwire has identified a web portal associated with the December hack, which was redacted from the publicly filed complaint, but has not been able to identify the hacker's identity, according to the suit.
The suit alleges violations of the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and trespass. It asks for a preliminary injunction barring the hacker or hackers and anyone working with them from pursuing the ransom demands and publishing sensitive corporate information online. The suit also seeks to reclaim all copies of the stolen data and an unspecified money judgment that includes disgorgement of the defendant's profits and unspecified compensatory and punitive damages.
The case has been assigned to Judge Timothy Batten.
Southwire is represented by Marcus Christian, a partner at Mayer Brown in Washington, D.C., and associate Jonathan Klein. Christian specializes in cybersecurity and data privacy. Before joining Mayer Brown, Christian was the executive assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Florida and former chief of staff for U.S. Rep. Peter Deutsch of Florida.
Klein referred all questions to Christian, who couldn't be reached for comment.
According to the lawsuit, Southwire's data was taken using Maze Ransomware, which encrypted Southwire's files, causing the company to lose access to data stored on its computer system. Although the suit redacted the dates that Southwire was hacked, the company sent a letter to customers on Dec. 11 notifying them of the Dec. 9 hack attack and warning that company operations might be impacted, according to online publication SC Media.
Attached to the suit is an email sent to Southwire saying, "We hacked your network and now all your files, documents, photos, databases and other important data are safely encrypted with reliable algorithms." The email included instructions for confirming the hack and for paying the ransom to release the files. It also identified the ransomware used as Allied Universal Maze Ransomware.
Southwire's suit redacted the amount of the ransom demanded, but media reports said the hacker demanded 850 bitcoin, or about $6 million.
Southwire's lawsuit also claims that, in addition to releasing confidential information onto a public website, the hacker publicly spread word of the hack. The hacker also set up a public website listing 27 companies that refused to pay its ransom.
Businesses, governments and law firms have frequently become a target of ransomware attacks and data breaches. A 2019 Law.com investigation found more than 100 law firms have fallen victim to data breaches that potentially exposed clients' and employees' personal and financial information over the past five years.
Last summer, hackers infected computers at Georgia's Administrative Office of the Courts, encrypting files and demanding a ransom to release them. In 2018, after the city of Atlanta became one of more than 200 targets of ransomware attacks, a federal grand jury in New Jersey charged two Iranians with developing a form of malicious software known as SamSam, which they used to try to extract bitcoin ransoms from more than 200 hospitals, local governments and other public institutions, according to the U.S. Justice Department.
In 2016, the U.S. attorney's office in Manhattan secured the indictment of three Chinese nationals charged with hacking two major U.S. law firms believed to be Weil, Gotshal & Manges and Cravath, Swaine & Moore, the Law.com investigation found.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Court Rejects Plaintiff's Attempt to Amend Claims Against Weapons Manufacturer
State Jury Awards $160M Verdict for Truck's Defective Design That Left Man With Spinal Cord Injury
Mercedes-Benz Hit With Consumer Class Action for Claims of Defective Wheel Configurations
Child Labor Probe Hammers Tennessee Factory, Highlighting Risks to Employers From Feds' Stepped-Up Enforcement
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The TikTokification of the Courtroom
- 2New Jersey’s Arbitration Appeal Deadline—A Call for Clarity
- 3Law Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
- 45th Circuit Strikes Down Law Barring Handgun Sales to Adults Under 21
- 5Commonwealth Court Overturns Zoning Board’s Denial Based on Merger Doctrine and Unnecessary Hardship Questions
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250