Former Fulton Jail Officer Says He Was Fired Because He Is Gay
A gay former detention officer's suit claims workplace discrimination because of his sexual orientation violates federal civil rights laws, an issue pending before the U.S. Supreme Court.
January 03, 2020 at 02:34 PM
3 minute read
A former detention officer is suing the Fulton County sheriff and three supervisors, claiming he was discriminated against because he is gay and then fired on allegedly false pretexts after he complained.
Former jail detention officer Demarcus Harris' lawsuit contending that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is barred by federal civil rights laws comes as the U.S. Supreme Court contemplates a similar case out of Georgia: Bostock v. Clayton County.
The Supreme Court appeared divided during arguments in that consolidated case over whether discrimination based on sex under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 applies to sexual orientation and gender identity.
Harris contends in his complaint, filed Dec. 30 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia in Atlanta, that he was fired for being gay. In his suit, Harris said his problems began after a fellow detention officer crudely told other employees he didn't want to work with Harris because of Harris' sexual orientation. Harris said in his suit that it was he, not the officer who complained, who was then subjected to a series of transfers to less desirable jobs, locations and work schedules.
After multiple meetings with jail supervisors to protest the transfers and schedule changes, Harris claimed supervisors began building a pretext case against him for alleged tardiness in order to fire him. Harris claimed he was listed as a "no call, no show" for work after a county counselor and human resources personnel gave him permission to take leave, and that supervisors then began monitoring when he clocked in for work.
Harris said he was fired last spring on the recommendation of Lt. Anthony Taylor, who is listed as a defendant. The other defendants include Fulton County Sheriff Ted Jackson and his office, Lt. Temeka Cherry and Capt. Tyna Taylor.
Harris is seeking back pay, lost wages and benefits, pay increases he would have received if he had remained on staff, compensatory and punitive damages and legal fees. He also has asked for a declaratory judgment that the sheriff's office violated Title VII of the U.S. Civil Rights Act of 1964 and USC 1983, and a permanent injunction barring the sheriff's office and its employees from committing similar violations on the basis of sexual orientation in the future.
Harris is represented by Thomas Mew, a partner at Atlanta's Buckley Beal, and firm associate Milinda Brown. Neither attorney could be reached for comment.
Sheriff spokeswoman Tracy Flanagan declined to comment on the litigation. But she confirmed that Harris was terminated effective April 4 while still a probationary employee.
According to Harris' suit, he was initially told by a shift supervisor after he first complained that he was being transferred "for his own safety. " He contended that Taylor later informed him that he knew the detention officer who reportedly made the discriminatory remarks about Harris "for a very long time" and didn't believe he would make the reportedly crude and discriminatory comments.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia Republicans Push to Limit Lawsuits. But Would That Keep Insurance Rates From Rising?
5 minute readA Plan Is Brewing to Limit Big-Dollar Suits in Georgia—and Lawyers Have Mixed Feelings
10 minute readPanel to Decide if Governor Should Suspend Georgia Lawyer From Elected Post
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250