Georgia Justices: 13 Contempt Counts Too Much for Defendant's Profane Courtroom Tirade
A Fulton County magistrate slammed a defendant with 13 criminal contempt counts and ordered him to serve 230 days in jail for a brief, obscene outburst during a preliminary hearing.
January 29, 2020 at 01:35 PM
4 minute read
The Georgia Supreme Court said a Fulton County judge went a bit overboard when she slammed a murder defendant with 13 counts of criminal contempt in response to a "profanity-laced tirade" in her courtroom—one count for each obscene word the man said.
Fulton County Magistrate Judge Karen Woodson—who retired in 2019—sentenced Sylvester Taylor to 230 days in jail, to be served after he either bonded out of jail or his underlying charges, which include murder and attempted rape, are resolved.
The opinion noted that even the prosecution agreed Taylor should not have been sentenced on multiple counts for the 2014 outburst, wrote Justice Sarah Warren in Monday's opinion.
"But here, even assuming that each of the 13 obscene words Taylor uttered during his outburst could warrant a conviction for contempt if used at different times during his criminal proceedings, the same is not true when the words are uttered during one continuous—and very brief—outburst," she said. "Indeed, in similar contexts, we have held that a defendant may not be convicted of two or more counts of the same crime where the evidence shows that the two counts are part of a single incident."
The order vacated the convictions and instructed the trial court to "convict and resentence Taylor for only one instance of contempt."
As detailed in the opinion and appellate briefs, a preliminary hearing before Woodson was concluding when he burst out "I ain't killed that bitch. That bitch killed herself. She committed suicide. Y'all keeping me locked up because that bitch committed suicide."
Woodson said "Wait a minute," but Taylor continued.
"I'm educated. I went to the University of Georgia. I studied motherfucking law. That bitch killed her motherfucking self. You know that. She put the needle in her own motherfucking arm. That bitch committed motherfucking suicide. Y'all going to keep me motherfucking locked up while the bitch committed suicide. Ain't nobody raped that bitch. Nobody hit that bitch. Check this. Ain't nobody say motherfucking nothing to me, man. I ain't tell nobody shit. Y'all can kiss my black ass."
Woodson did not immediately enter a contempt order but deferred action until a hearing nearly a week later.
"The record does not reflect that the appellant was accorded any prior notice of the precise charges," said the brief filed by Taylor's public defender, David Cooper, and Georgia Public Defender Council Appellate Division lawyers James Bonner Jr. and Brandon Bullard.
"The only notice appears in the 9 April 2014 adjudication order itself," the brief said, which cited Taylor "raising his voice loudly in open court" and his "use of no less than thirteen profane or obscene words in the courtroom."
Taylor "was entitled to know that he would be facing jeopardy of 13 or 14 consecutive 20-day terms," his brief said.
Taylor "disrupted the court once in a single continuous outburst that lasted no more than a minute," it said. "That single outburst framed the appropriate unit of punishment. It was error for the court to sanction [him] multipliciously, imposing cumulative punishments based on the number of vulgar words he used."
A brief submitted by senior assistant Fulton County district attorney Kevin Armstrong reached the same conclusion: "Under the circumstances presented, the state agrees there was only one act of contempt which occurred."
Bullard said he was "gratified that the court granted Mr. Taylor some relief, which, as the state conceded, was consistent with the law: The substance of a contempt is the single continuous act of misbehavior, not every little bothersome thing that someone might have done in the course of that act."
His brief noted that the underlying charges against Taylor have been stayed due to concerns over his mental capacity, and Bullard said he could not discuss the pending case.
Woodson was forwarded a copy of the opinion, but offered no comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWho Got the Work: 16 Lawyers Appointed to BioLab Class Action Litigation
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250