Kobe Bryant and His Lesson About the 'Infinite Groove'
Bryant said, "Whether you make the shot or miss the shot is inconsequential." That has stuck with me, and here's what I understood him to mean.
January 31, 2020 at 12:23 PM
4 minute read
Five years ago, I read an interview with Kobe Bryant in The New York Times. I bracketed one of his quotes with a red pen and brought it to my office. It's been in the top drawer of my desk ever since.
During the interview, Kobe shared a story about a realization his daughter had used to overcome test anxiety at school. The gist of the anecdote was this: The test might be hard, but once it's done, it's done. You don't look back. You move on.
The reporter then asked Kobe if he had used that same approach to make clutch shots in the NBA. Kobe said yes, and answered this way: "There's an infinite groove. Whether you make the shot or miss the shot is inconsequential."
That has stuck with me, and here's what I understood him to mean. We can excel in the clutch by knowing we'll continue to shoot, no matter what, when that "clutch" moment has passed. It will pass. There will be another clutch moment to prepare for the following day. We'll get another shot. We need the courage to take it.
As I thought about that quote again following his death, I checked Kobe's career stats. During his 20-year NBA run, he missed more shots than he made. In fact, he missed more than two-thirds of his 3-point attempts. He shot a lot; he missed a lot. Do any of those misses on the basketball court matter now? No, they don't. Could he have been a Hall of Fame player if he had paralyzed himself with worry about shots he had taken and missed? No. Never.
Over the last few days, I've had this discussion with several of my law partners. They have observed that, as Type A lawyers, our instinctual response can be to focus more on the errors or misses, rather than what we can do to maximize the next opportunity for ourselves and our clients.
They have affirmed that trial lawyers can't be afraid of losing. We may lose some, but we prepare to be the best, to fight the good fight and to lace 'em up for the next fight. They have likened the concept of the infinite groove to the famous quote from Teddy Roosevelt's "Man in the Arena" speech:
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat."
We all miss shots in our lives; Lord knows I do. Despite hard work and obsessive preparation and all the effort we can muster, the ball's going to bounce out many times. We can learn from the misses, of course, but we have to believe they often don't matter. We have to keep going. We can't think about the misses when we take the next shot. And we have to be ready to take it.
I try to remind myself this when I strive for things in my life. Whether I make the shot or miss the shot is often inconsequential in the grand scheme of things. What matters is that I work hard. (My dad taught me that.) What matters is that I keep shooting.
The deaths of Kobe Bryant, his beautiful daughter and the others with them on the helicopter Sunday morning remind us we won't be here forever—on this earthly court, at least. We don't know when, but the clock will eventually run out on all of us. What we leave behind will be a legacy of our best efforts, not our worst days, I hope, and the impact those efforts have had on the ones we love.
Let's all keep shooting.
Chris Marquardt leads the labor and employment group at Alston & Bird and is a former Princeton University basketball player.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Rejects Teams' Challenge to NASCAR's 'Anticompetitive Terms' in Agreement
'Possible Harm'?: Winston & Strawn Will Appeal Unfavorable Ruling in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readMovie Theater Agrees to Pay Former Employee $137K in EEOC Discrimination Settlement
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250