Sirius XM Settles Texas TCPA Class Action for $32.4M
Under the terms of the settlement approved by a federal judge in Texas, claimants are entitled to a share of a $25 million settlement fund or three months of premium Sirius XM programming.
January 31, 2020 at 06:17 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge in Texas gave final approval to a $32.4 million class action settlement resolving claims that satellite radio provider Sirius XM violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by making marketing calls to people registered with the national do-not-call registry.
The settlement, approved Wednesday by Senior Judge Sidney Fitzwater of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, includes more than $6.6 million in attorney fees and expenses.
The potential class numbers in the millions, with more than 433,000 claims forms already submitted, according to court filings.
Plaintiffs lawyers include W. Craft Hughes and Jarrett Ellzey with Hughes Ellzey in Houston; Henry Turner of Turner Law Offices in Decatur, Georgia; Aaron Siri and Mason Barney of Siri & Glimstad in New York; Douglas Werman of Werman Salas in Chicago and Daniel Hutchinson of Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein in San Francisco.
Sirius is represented by a group of Jones Day lawyers including Lee Armstrong, Natalia Delaune, Thomas Demitrack, Sidney McClung and Albert Rota.
Turner said the lawyers are bound by a confidentiality agreement and cannot discuss the case.
The complaint and other filings indicate that it began when lead plaintiff, Texas resident Thomas Buchanan, bought a new Honda Odyssey van in 2016. Shortly afterward, a "welcome package" from Sirius arrived offering him a free trial offer.
Buchanan ignored the promotion but began receiving frequent marketing calls from Sirius: between July 19 and Aug. 4 of that year, he got 16 calls on his landline phone, which was registered with the do-not-call list.
He sent Sirius a cease-and-desist letter but continued to receive the calls, his complaint said.
He filed the class action in 2017.
The suit was stayed in early 2019 while the parties engaged in several months of mediation. A settlement was reached and a motion to approve it was filed in mid-January.
Under the terms of the settlement, the class includes anyone who signed up for the do-not-call registry between October 2013 and April 2019 and received more than one call from Sirius afterward or who received such calls after registering with Sirius' internal do-not-call list.
Individuals who file claims for are entitled to a pro rata share of a $25 million settlement fund, or may choose to receive a three-month subscription to Sirius XM's "All Access" programming, worth about $81.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Fierce Battle of Expert Witnesses' Expected in Cybersecurity Spat
14-State Coalition Sues TikTok, Alleging Addictive Algorithms Trigger Mental Health Harms in Adolescents
Mike Lynch's Brush With Prison Taught Him Life Is Precious. Then a Yacht Accident Proved Him Right
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250