Dismissed: Suit to End Long Voting Lines in Georgia's Largest Counties Fails
Sean Young, legal director of the ACLU of Georgia, said that U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg left open the possibility the suit could be refiled if Fulton, Cobb, DeKalb and Gwinnett election boards don't do enough to curtail long lines in 2020.
February 12, 2020 at 04:13 PM
4 minute read
A federal judge in Atlanta on Wednesday dismissed a lawsuit intended to curtail long voting lines at polling places in the state's four largest counties during the 2018 election.
U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg of the Northern District of Georgia dismissed the voting-rights case, brought by the ACLU of Georgia and the ACLU Foundation in New York, without prejudice. This left open the possibility that it could be refiled "if or when the county elections officials (or the state for that matter) fail to constitutionally carry out their duties to properly conduct and administer the 2020 elections."
|Broader disputes
Totenberg's ruling comes as Georgia faces a national spotlight over voter suppression issues stemming from the 2018 gubernatorial race. For instance, Democratic gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams refused to concede the race to Republican Brian Kemp, who campaigned while overseeing the election as secretary of state. Abrams had claimed measures Kemp implemented during his tenure were intended to suppress the minority vote. Kemp and his attorneys have repeatedly denied those claims, but Abrams has used her national platform to combat voter suppression and voter purges across the country.
Meanwhile, an omnibus voting rights suit brought against the secretary of state and state election board following the 2018 election by a group Abrams founded in Georgia to combat voter suppression remains active. The suit seeks sweeping federal relief to end practices, including those targeted by the ACLU suit, intended to suppress the minority vote.
And Georgia's two Senate seats are also up for grabs. First-term Republican Sen. David Perdue is facing reelection, as is Sen. Kelly Loeffler, whom Kemp appointed last month to fill retiring Republican Sen. Johnny Isakson's seat over the objections of President Donald Trump.
|Statutory obligation
In Wednesday's order, Totenberg said that any remedy requiring county election boards to provide "all necessary funds to adequately conduct the elections" or instructing them "to take all necessary actions to carry out their functions so as not to impinge on voters' federal constitutional rights … is nothing more than a request that the court order the counties and [boards of elections] to comply with their statutory obligation."
"This court cannot guarantee that voters will not have to stand in line, or that absentee ballots will not get delayed or lost in the mail," Totenberg concluded. "And any injunction that would pretend otherwise and purport to impose obligations on defendants to take 'all necessary action' to ensure against such circumstances would be too amorphous to be capable of enforcement."
The ACLU suit was filed on behalf of voters in Fulton, DeKalb, Cobb and Gwinnett counties just months after five federal judges in Georgia issued six temporary restraining orders against then Secretary of State Brian Kemp, now Georgia's governor, as votes were being cast or ballots being counted in the 2018 election. The TROs were intended to increase the number of counted ballots. Attorneys with Dechert in Chicago and New York joined with the ACLU in the litigation.
Sean Young, legal director of the ACLU of Georgia, said that, unlike other voting rights lawsuits pending since the 2018 election, this one was directed at county election officials rather than the state. "We needed to hold county election officials accountable for their role in running elections," he said. "Counties pass budgets that dictate how many resources are set aside for an election; county election boards vote on polling place changes, and other resource allocation issues."
Young also said that Totenberg's order "essentially invited plaintiffs to revive this lawsuit if there are imminent signs" that insufficient or disfunctional voting machines and a decrease in polling places were generating hours-long voting lines.
"The secretary of state absolutely has a responsibility for running smooth elections, but very few people recognize the influence county election officials have," he said. "County election officials are not being held to account for election irregularities."
Bryan Tyson, an attorney with Taylor English Duma defending the Gwinnett County election board, referred questions to county spokesman Joe Sorenson. Sorenson couldn't be reached. Cobb County Senior Associate County Attorney Elizabeth Monyak called Totenberg's decision 'well-reasoned," and said the county was "very pleased."
Attorneys with the Fulton and DeKalb county law departments couldn't be reached.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readJudge Sets Early 2025 Trial for Ex-Prosecutor Charged With Meddling in Ahmaud Arbery Investigation
3 minute readFulton Reelects Willis as DA Amid Ongoing 2020 Election Case Against Trump
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Will the 9th Circuit Still be Center Stage in Trump Policy Challenges?
- 2Obtaining Reimbursement from Medicaid
- 3NY Requiring Lawyers to Report Out-of-State Admissions, Public Discipline
- 4Man Hits Cow in Case That Tests 'Unrealistic Delivery Times'
- 5DC Judge, Applying 'Loper Bright,' Dismisses Complaint in Medicare Drug-Classification Dispute
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250