Jury, Asked if Trucker's Fainting Was 'Act of God,' Awards $21M for Pedestrian's Death
"The best quote was from his niece," the winning lawyer said. She told the jury, "'Kip had a lot of limitations. That's true. But he had no limitations on his character.'"
February 14, 2020 at 01:56 PM
6 minute read
A jury that watched video of the tragedy awarded $21 million for the family of a man killed while he was out for a walk and a truck driver passed out at the wheel.
The winning lawyer, R. Shane Lazenby of Lazenby Law Group in Gainesville, said Thursday the jury took 39 minutes to return a $15 million verdict: $13 million for the life of Kip Holland and $2 million for his pain and suffering, plus $30,000 for medical and funeral expenses.
Then the jury deliberated for another hour and a half before returning with a $6 million verdict to cover the family's litigation expenses based on a 40% contingency fee agreement, he said.
The case was tried in four days before Senior Judge Richard Story of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Lazenby said. The verdicts came on Feb. 6.
Grant B. Smith of Dennis, Corry, Smith & Dixon in Atlanta defended the driver, the late James Wendell Harper, and Cypress Insurance Co. Smith could not be reached immediately for comment. But his voir dire questions in court records foreshadowed his strategy.
"Our defense in this case is based on the Act of God defense on the ground Mr. Harper did not have a history of passing out," Smith said to the jurors. "However, he had a number of health issues, including cancer and COPD. Without hearing more, are any of you concerned you might tend to favor the Plaintiff—even if just a little bit?"
"It was an odd defense," Lazenby said. "The statute lists lightning strikes and perils of the sea." The issue was whether the incident was foreseeable, he said.
According to his voir dire questions, Smith went on to tell the potential jurors to "expect evidence to show Mr. Harper had a number of medical conditions before the Dec. 8, 2016, collision—including throat cancer, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease also known as COPD, arthritis, and pneumonia. Expect evidence to show Mr. Harper passed out before the collision."
Harper, who lived in Groveoak, Alabama, died just seven months later. He was 77. His health problems played a continuing role in the trial.
The defense summary in the consolidated pretrial order said Harper "made a mistake on his DOT questionnaire and failed to list certain medications and conditions, but these did not affect his ability to drive on the day of the accident and had nothing to do with his sudden and unexpected fainting spell just before the collision."
The failure to list those medications and conditions formed the basis of the $6 million attorney fee award. The jury agreed with the plaintiffs' side that such a failure constitutes bad faith on the part of the driver, Lazenby said.
Lazenby's work on the case is not finished. Harper's Cypress Insurance policy limit was $1 million. But Lazenby said he will pursue a bad faith claim against the company, since it declined several policy limit settlement demands.
Lazenby, 47, is a former Army Ranger and paratrooper. After graduating from Mercer University law school in 1999, he returned to active duty, serving as a judge advocate and counsel to his commander in Afghanistan, helping gather intelligence. He earned a Bronze Star for his service during Operation Enduring Freedom. When he returned home to Georgia, he worked for defense firms, first in Atlanta and then in Gainesville, for a decade before switching to the plaintiffs' side and starting Lazenby Law in 2013, located in a renovated house near the shore of Lake Lanier.
About 4 miles away is the spot where Harper lost control of his truck on a busy section of Ga. 369, known as Brown's Bridge Road, and hit Holland. Lazenby said Holland's family came to the Lazenby Law office just four days later. It was December 2016.
"I'm glad I went out to the scene that day. It was still marked," Lazenby said. "I just stood where Kip got hit. I just turned around in a circle and looked at everything real slowly."
He spotted a business nearby, a marble company that is not there anymore. He went there to see if they had security cameras. They did. Within hours, he had three videos showing exactly what happened, he said.
Holland was walking along the road between his home, just 500 feet away, and the nearest grocery store. The truck's trailer—filled with chicken feed—separated and rolled off the road over Holland. He was taken to Northeast Georgia Medical Center in Gainesville, where he was pronounced dead that same day. He was 50.
Lazenby played the video for the jury—after asking the judge's permission to let Holland's family leave the courtroom.
"What you see on the video is him walking. You see him stop in his tracks. You see the truck coming. The trailer rolls over the top of him," Lazenby said. "He's just gone. It was very powerful."
Proving damages—mainly the value of Holland's life—was as crucial as proving liability for his death. Lazenby said Holland was intellectually disabled and had lived his whole life in the same house with his mother—the case's plaintiff—and brother—his estate's executor. Holland had never been employed. He had done yardwork and other small jobs for neighbors, who came to court to testify as damages witnesses, talking about their friendships and his kindness.
"The best quote was from his niece," Lazenby said. She told the jury, "'Kip had a lot of limitations. That's true. But he had no limitations on his character.'"
Lazenby said he told the jurors, "There's a whole lot more to the value of life than how much money you make."
He also said he told them, "You will be wondering for the rest of your life whether the driver of the truck next to you lied on his DOT questionnaire."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAtlanta Attorneys Rely on Google Earth, YouTube for Evidence in $6M Faulty Guardrail Settlement
Fowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute read'A Fierce Battle of Expert Witnesses' Expected in Cybersecurity Spat
Former UPS Workers Lodge Discrimination Suit for 'Systemic Racial Bias' in Workplace Culture
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250