Justices 'Concerned' About State Paying for Pro Bono Defense Experts in Trial Over Beauty Queen's Murder
Beloved small town teacher and beauty queen Tara Grinstead disappeared 15 years ago. The trial of the man accused of killing her has just been delayed again.
February 14, 2020 at 03:29 PM
4 minute read
The Georgia Supreme Court decided on Thursday to hear a pretrial appeal over whether the state should pay for experts and investigators hired by the private attorneys who agreed to provide pro bono defense in the case of a man accused of murdering teacher and beauty queen Tara Grinstead 15 years ago.
In an unsigned order, the court granted Ryan Duke's application for interlocutory appeal:
"The Court is particularly concerned with the following: Did the trial court err in holding that an indigent defendant in a criminal case who is represented by private, pro bono counsel does not have a constitutional right or a statutory right under the Indigent Defense Act, OCGA § 17-12-1 et seq., to state-funded experts and investigators?"
The justices set deadlines for notice of appeal and briefing on the question.
"We are very pleased that the Supreme Court agreed that this issue was so important that it needed to be heard prior to trial," Ashleigh Merchant of the Merchant Law Firm in Marietta said. The Merchant Firm is defending Ryan Duke pro bono, along with John Gibbs of Troutman Sanders.
On the other side is Tifton Judicial Circuit District Attorney C. Paul Bowden. He could not be reached for comment.
"This is an issue that affects our entire state and all indigent defendants' ability to receive a fair trial," Merchant said. "This is also important to the legal community because the inability to obtain experts and other ancillary services that are necessary for a fair trial serves as a limit on attorneys' ability to accept pro bono or 'low bono' work."
It's the second try. The high court considered, then dismissed, an application for appeal on the same question last June.
"So after we lost that case, we renewed our motions in the trial court and—based on comments that the Supreme Court felt this was important and needed to be heard pretrial—the judge re-entered (and re-denied) our original motions and this time granted a certificate of immediate review," Merchant said.
Duke dismissed his public defender to hire the Merchant Firm when they offered to take his case pro bono.
"Our indigent defense system needs attorneys to be willing to accept pro bono or low bono legal representation of criminal defendants," Merchant said, noting an "already overburdened public defender system."
Although he still has not been tried, this will not be the first time Duke's case has gone before the Supreme Court. The justices heard oral arguments in October 2017 over a gag order imposed on lawyers, police and even witnesses by then-Irwin County Superior Court Judge Melanie Cross, who has since stepped down. The case is now before Tifton Judicial Circuit Chief Judge William Reinhardt II.
"We're here today because of that rarest of judicial remedies—a gag order," S. Derek Bauer of Baker & Hostetler, representing WXIA 11 Alive TV in Atlanta and WXIA TV in Macon, told the court at that time, during a special session at the University of Georgia law school in Athens. While the U.S. Supreme Court has always "left open the possibility" of the need to restrict communications to protect the right to a fair trial, it was always meant as a "remedy of last resort," Bauer said.
"Protection from prior restraint is a primary guarantee of the Constitution," Bauer said then. "Our way of life doesn't allow the government to say you cannot speak on these topics."
Bauer won. But that appeal delayed the case for two years.
Then, just as the trial was starting, this new appeal put the brakes on again.
Duke was arrested in 2017 and charged in the mysterious disappearance of Grinstead—the high school history teacher, Miss Tifton and Miss Georgia contestant from 2005. After helping out at the Miss Georgia Sweet Potato Pageant and attending a cookout at the family home of a former school superintendent, she headed back to her neat, white wood frame house in the small town of Ocilla and was never seen again.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Possible Harm'?: Winston & Strawn Will Appeal Unfavorable Ruling in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute read3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute read'Paragraph V Displaced Lathrop': High Court Mulls Sovereign Immunity Waiver Disputes
7 minute read11th Circuit Revives Project Veritas' Defamation Lawsuit Against CNN
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Law Firm Accused of Barratry for Allegedly Soliciting Crash Victims
- 2Carlton Fields Downsizes in Move to New Atlanta Office
- 3Trump's Selection of Zeldin to Head EPA Draws Surprise, Little Hope of Avoiding Deregulation
- 4Against the Odds: Voters Elect Woody Clermont to the Broward Judicial Bench
- 5US Supreme Court Justices Pass on Landlord Challenge to NY Rent Stabilization
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250