AG Carr Cheers Ruling Resurrecting Pensacola's Cross
"We strongly believe that memorials like this one do not violate the Constitution and should be protected and preserved," AG Chris Carr said, naming two in Georgia that may benefit from the decision.
February 22, 2020 at 02:54 PM
5 minute read
This week's U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit victory for the Bay View cross in Pensacola, Florida, could help preserve similar monuments in other states.
So says Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr, who joined colleagues from a dozen other states in an amicus filing supporting the cross.
"We strongly believe that memorials like this one do not violate the Constitution and should be protected and preserved," Carr said in a news release. "Today's ruling is a great win and provides clear guidance as we continue working to protect these kinds of memorials in Georgia."
Carr named two monuments in Georgia that could benefit from the ruling. One is a 12-foot cross along the trail of the Chickamauga Battlefield in Fort Oglethorpe. The other is a stone cross honoring local World War I veterans on a street median in Augusta.
Long lost is a similar cross from Rabun County's Black Rock Mountain that the Eleventh Circuit ordered removed in 1983. The Rabun County precedent led the Eleventh Circuit to rule against the Pensacola cross in 2018. But residents who sued to remove the Pensacola cross appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which sent the case back after ruling that a cross in another challenge did not violate the Constitution's prohibition against the establishment of religion.
The Eleventh Circuit reconsidered and changed its mind in light of the latest U.S, Supreme Court decision.
"In our earlier opinion in this case, we followed Rabun right down the line—as we were obliged to do," Judge Kevin Newsom wrote for a panel that included Senior Judge Frank Hull and District Judge Charles Ashley Royal of the Middle District of Georgia, sitting by designation. "In particular, given the factual parallels between the Black Rock Mountain and Bayview Park crosses—both 30-some-odd feet tall, both erected by private organizations, both dedicated in conjunction with Easter services, and both located on government property—we held that the latter, like the former, violated the Establishment Clause."
While Pennsacola's SCOTUS cert petition was pending, the Supreme Court decided American Legion v. American Humanist Association, "holding that a 32-foot Latin cross on public land in Bladensburg, Maryland does not violate the Establishment Clause," Newsom said. "The following week, the Supreme Court granted the City's petition for certiorari in this case, vacated our earlier decision, and remanded for further consideration in light of American Legion."
That further consideration resulted in the turnaround for the Pensacola cross Wednesday.
A key part of the decision was the assertion by lawyers for the city that the function of the cross broadened over the years. What started as a focal point for Easter sunrise services became a place for the community to gather in times of trial and celebration, Newsom said. The city even added a bandstand.
In one long sentence, Newsom summed up the change in position:
"Having carefully reviewed the American Legion opinion—or more accurately opinions (there are seven of them)—and having considered the parties' supplemental briefing, we now hold (1) that we remain bound by Rabun to conclude that plaintiffs have (or at least one of them has) Article III standing to challenge Pensacola's maintenance of the Bayview Park cross, but (2) that American Legion abrogates Rabun to the extent that the latter disregarded evidence of 'historical acceptance' and instead applied Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971), and, further, that when American Legion—rather than Rabun—is applied, the cross's presence on city property doesn't violate the Establishment Clause."
Newsom also offered a short version of the story.
"For present purposes, perhaps American Legion's clearest message is this: Lemon is dead," Newsom said. "Well, sort of. It's dead, that is, at least with respect to cases involving religious displays and monuments—including crosses."
The attorneys who filed the suit said they are not willing to accept a "massive Christian cross" in a public park.
"The court dealt a devastating blow to the Establishment Clause in the Eleventh Circuit," American Humanist Association Legal Director Monica Miller, lead counsel on the case, said in a news release after the ruling. "We are currently exploring all of our options."
Meanwhile, Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody agreed with Carr, her fellow friend of the court.
"This ruling is a notable victory, not only for our WWII veterans, but also for the protection and preservation of historical memorials in Florida," Moody said in an email to the Daily Report. "The Bayview Park cross has been a prominent staple to the Pensacola community for decades. I am pleased that our office joined our sister states in filing a brief supporting its constitutionality, and that the court provided further guidance supporting the protection of these cherished memorials going forward."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute read'Didn't Notice Patient Wasn't Breathing': $13.7M Verdict Against Anesthesiologists
12 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250