Alston Partner Switches Sides, Opens Plaintiffs Firm With Science Focus
Aaron Block said he wants to take on "cases that will really make a difference" after a decade defending complex mass tort cases at Alston & Bird.
February 24, 2020 at 05:32 PM
4 minute read
After spending the first decade of his legal career at Alston & Bird, mass-tort defense litigator Aaron Block has started his own plaintiffs firm, saying he wanted to be more entrepreneurial with the latitude to take on cases "that will really make a difference in the world."
The former Alston & Bird partner said he plans to use his experience defending scientifically complex mass tort cases for product manufacturers and industry groups to take on "serious complex plaintiffs cases in a high-level Alston & Bird way."
"That's the vision. I'm not the first person to try it," said Block, who opened the Block Firm last week in space he's subletting from plaintiffs firm Conley Griggs Partin, which he noted has served as an incubator for other fledgling plaintiffs lawyers.
Block said he's using savings and might undertake some project-based hourly work for corporate plaintiffs referred by other firms to finance his switch to the plaintiffs side. "And with a hope and a prayer too," he added.
At 40, Block said, "I'm mature enough for this to be plausible—and young enough to have the energy and drive to take a big risk." He said he wants to show his two young daughters that, "if you have an idea or cause that you think is important, you've got to jump in and make that happen."
"I love Alston & Bird.They're a great firm, and I'm so grateful for the lawyer they've trained me into," he added.
At Alston, Block handled cases with scientific issues as to whether the product in question caused plaintiffs health problems. That included cases alleging that sugar caused diabetes, cellphones caused health hazards, and talc contained asbestos causing mesothelioma.
He also worked on a major class action for Chinese drywall manufacturer Taishan Gypsum over plaintiffs claims that defective drywall sickened residents and made their homes uninhabitable. A federal judge approved a $248 million settlement agreement on Jan. 10 after a decade of litigation.
Block said an early mentor at Alston, Jane Thorpe, who is now retired, taught him how to work cases where questions about toxicology, epidemiology and other scientific issues come into play. "It's been one of the strengths of the Alston & Bird mass tort practice," Block said. "We aim to know the science at least as well as the scientists on both sides."
"You learn a lot," he added, saying that he's spent time with scientists at Harvard and Johns Hopkins Universities, learning how to think about questions of causation and the implications of science on public policy.
At the Block Firm, the litigator aims to take on serious personal injury cases and tort cases involving science. Block said he's been talking to "my former opponents in the mass tort world," as to potential collaborations.
He also wants to take on civil rights cases. At Alston, Block maintained an active pro bono practice representing asylum-seekers and victims of child sex abuse where DFACs "failed in its duty to protect children," Block said. "Alston & Bird is incredibly supportive of pro bono work."
In a recent pro bono case, Block won bond for an Episcopal priest from Nigeria who sought asylum in the United States after Boko Haram killed his wife, infant son and father. The priest was imprisoned for five years while his immigration case was pending, Block said, even though he had no criminal record and was not a flight risk.
"The government refused to give him a bond hearing," said Block. He filed a habeas petition for the priest, and last year a federal court finally ordered the man's release from custody, pending the resolution of his asylum case. The government declined to appeal.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHurricane Helene's Impact On Asheville, North Carolina: How Public and Private Attorneys Dealt With Closures, Safety and Sanitation
Second Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readBig Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 2Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 3In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 4Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 5The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250