How a U.S. Attorney Plans to Make a Federal Case Against Dogfighting
"Illegal dog fighting is a barbaric activity," U.S. Attorney Charles "Charlie" Peeler said. "Those who choose to violate the Animal Welfare Act face serious consequences, including federal prison time, where there is no parole."
February 27, 2020 at 03:36 PM
3 minute read
U.S. attorney Charles "Charlie" Peeler of the Middle District of Georgia will be using the federal Animal Welfare Act to prosecute alleged drug traffickers he says have been running a "barbaric" business.
Together with local law enforcement agencies and the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, Peeler executed 11 search warrants Wednesday at different locations around the region as part of a months long investigation, he announced. And that's how the U.S. Marshals Service came to be in possession of roughly 160 rescued dogs.
That's more than three times the number rescued when ex-Atlanta Falcons quarterback Michael Vick was famously arrested and charged with dog fighting a dozen years ago. Unprecedented efforts were made then to rescue abused animals and help them recover.
"Illegal dog fighting is a barbaric activity," Peeler said in an announcement of the news Thursday. "Those who choose to violate the Animal Welfare Act face serious consequences, including federal prison time, where there is no parole."
Peeler expressed gratitude for all the law enforcement teams who came to the rescue and said assistant U.S. attorney Julia Bowen Mize will lead the prosecution.
Many of the animals are malnourished and scarred, Peeler said. Some are severely injured and require surgery. A golden-colored female pit bull was discovered chained with broken legs, over bred and nearly starved. She received emergency care on the site Wednesday from a veterinarian working with law enforcement officers. Other dogs were taken to clinics for emergency surgery to treat their injuries. For the safety of the animals, the location of their care and housing will not be made public, Peeler said.
Peeler also shared a statement from special agent-in-charge Jason Williams of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Office of Inspector General.
"The provisions of the Animal Welfare Act were designed to protect animals from being used in illegal fighting ventures, which often entail other forms of criminal activity involving drugs, firearms, and gambling," Williams said. "Animal fighting is an investigative priority for USDA-OIG, and together with the Department of Justice, we will work with our law enforcement partners to investigate and assist in the criminal prosecution of those who participate in animal fighting ventures."
The act defines "animal fighting venture" as "any event, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, that involves a fight conducted or to be conducted between at least two animals for purposes of sport, wagering, or entertainment," Peeler noted. The law prohibits sponsoring, exhibiting, owning or transporting an animal for fighting.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Fulfilled Her Purpose on the Court': Presiding Judge M. Yvette Miller Is 'Ready for a New Challenge'
8 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250