Georgia Senate Bill Aims to Limit Lawsuits in the State
"Senate Bill 415, if it becomes law, is going to drastically change about 15 areas of law," an opponent of the bill told a subcommittee hearing Wednesday. "Trucking, aviation, municipal law, tort law, jury trials, rules of evidence, product liability, premises liability, asbestos law."
February 28, 2020 at 09:40 AM
2 minute read
A Georgia Senate bill backed by Republicans aims to take on the tall task of limiting lawsuits in state courts, citing high legal costs faced by businesses.
Senate Bill 415, sponsored by state Sen. Steve Gooch of Dahlonega, would make many changes to civil law in Georgia. It would change the information that could be provided to jurors trying civil cases, make it more difficult to sue landowners for injuries caused by a third party and limit the amount of time someone has to bring a product liability lawsuit, among other provisions.
Gooch said during a news conference Thursday that "Georgia's reputation has been badly tarnished in recent years by a civil justice system that tolerates lawsuit abuse, expands theory of liability for businesses and property owners, awards frequent nuclear or runaway verdicts and fails to deliver on the promise of predictability." He said that drives up costs on everything from grocery items to insurance premiums for Georgia families and businesses.
The bill was heard by a Senate subcommittee Wednesday. No vote was taken, though Gooch said he'd like to make a few changes in consultation with committee members and bring it back quickly.
Jon Pope, an attorney in Gainesville and the executive vice president for the Georgia Trial Lawyers Association, spoke forcefully against the bill.
"Senate Bill 415, if it becomes law, is going to drastically change about 15 areas of law," Pope said. "Trucking, aviation, municipal law, tort law, jury trials, rules of evidence, product liability, premises liability, asbestos law."
Pope provided specific criticism for each section of the bill during the committee hearing and said the legislation was "not good for the state of Georgia."
The bill came about as a result of several recommendations put together by a Senate study committee last year that included Gooch.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTransgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws
Georgia Republicans Push to Limit Lawsuits. But Would That Keep Insurance Rates From Rising?
5 minute readA Plan Is Brewing to Limit Big-Dollar Suits in Georgia—and Lawyers Have Mixed Feelings
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1January Petitions Press High Court on Guns, Birth Certificate Sex Classifications
- 2'A Waste of Your Time': Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
- 3Judge Extends Tom Girardi's Time in Prison Medical Facility to Feb. 20
- 4Supreme Court Denies Trump's Request to Pause Pending Environmental Cases
- 5‘Blitzkrieg of Lawlessness’: Environmental Lawyers Decry EPA Spending Freeze
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250