After $5.5M Legal Malpractice Verdict, Jury to Ponder Punitive Damages
The plaintiff, a doctor and attorney, sued his former lawyer and onetime employer for legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty.
March 06, 2020 at 06:09 PM
4 minute read
After delivering a verdict worth more than $5.5 million to a man who sued his former lawyer and employer for legal malpractice and other claims, a DeKalb County jury will be back in court Monday to consider how much to award in punitive damages against Atlanta lawyer James Potts II.
The only issue at trial in the contentious dispute between Potts and plaintiff William Clowdis Jr., an attorney and medical doctor, was the amount of damages to be awarded after Potts' defenses were struck for litigation tactics a judge deemed "the most egregious the court has ever seen."
Even so, plaintiffs attorney Louis Levenson said Potts "still tried to divert liability, blaming other people."
"From a trial strategy point of view, I thought it was a bad strategy, but that was their approach. Obviously, it didn't sell," said Levenson, who tried the case with Levenson & Associates colleagues Lori Christman and Randy Williams.
Potts and his attorneys, Eugene Butt of Potts' Atlanta law firm and Decatur solo R. Edward Furr Jr., did not respond to request for comment Friday.
According to Levenson and court filings, the case began when Clowdis, an obstetrician/gynecologist then practicing in Virginia, had his license suspended in 2007 because of a prescription drug-related charge in Colorado a few years earlier.
Clowdis—who also had a law degree—retained Potts to represent him before the Virginia Medical Board. Potts hired Clowdis to assist with working up medical malpractice cases, paying him a salary and providing lodging on Potts property.
Clowdis subsequently accused Potts of ruining his relationship with the medical board, resulting in his license being "re-suspended" and failing to do anything to help his case.
He also said Potts settled cases the two worked on together for more than $10 million but refused to share the proceeds.
Clowdis sued Potts and his practice in DeKalb County Superior Court in 2016 for multiple counts, including legal malpractice, defamation, breach of fiduciary duty and libel.
Potts successfully moved to have several of the counts dismissed and filed his own counterclaims and motion for summary judgment.
In 2017, the judge then overseeing the case, J.P. Boulee, struck Potts' pleadings as a sanction for repeated instances of discovery abuse, writing that Potts "willfully, falsely, and knowingly den[ied] the existence of requested discoverable documents."
The case was assigned to Judge Stacey Hydrick after Boulee was named to the federal bench last year.
During a trial that began Feb. 24, Levenson said he called the only expert witness to testify, Hawkins Parnell & Young partner Christine Mast.
The jury deliberated for about 2½ days before entering a verdict Thursday afternoon awarding Clowdis $5,563,600, including $2,728,000 in general damages, $2,350,000 in loss of earnings and $485,000 in attorney fees. The jury also found that punitive damages should be awarded.
Levenson said he doesn't expect that portion of the trial to last long.
"I told the judge I expected my opening to be five minutes, then an hour, hour-and-a-half for the trial," he said.
Levenson said that, since filing the suit, Clowdis has gotten his bar license in New York and will likely join the Virginia bar and also hopes to have his medical license back soon.
"I feel very bad for Dr. Clowdis for having been put through this," he said. "What troubled me most about this case—and perhaps troubled the jurors as well—was that, rather than accept any responsibility for what he had done, Mr. Potts blamed Dr. Clowdis. They called him a con man and worse."
Asked whether Potts carries any legal malpractice insurance, Levenson said he didn't think so.
"Not as far as I know," he said. "His lawyer told me he didn't."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute readOn the Move: Hunton Andrews Kurth Practice Leader Named Charlotte Managing Partner
6 minute readHusch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
9 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250