Arbitrator Awards $4M to Fired Ex-CEO of Milton-Based Auto Battery Company
A JAMS arbitrator said Exide Technologies had no basis to claim it fired its former CEO "for cause" and must pay him more than $4 million in severance, fees and interest.
March 06, 2020 at 11:03 AM
4 minute read
The former CEO of a Georgia auto battery manufacturing company has asked a Fulton County judge to enforce an arbitration award of more than $4 million in severance pay, interest and fees as well as shares of company stock, after he was ousted in 2018.
The arbitration award said Victor Koelsch's termination from Exide Technologies was a pretext contrived by a company facing a "liquidity crisis" and looking to save millions by falsely claiming he was fired for cause.
According to the award and petition for enforcement, in 2015 Milton-based Exide Technologies was emerging from bankruptcy and hired Koelsch—a former executive with Michelin Tires—to run the company.
In April 2018 Koelsch and two other Exide employees attending a conference were asked to meet with representatives of a Chinese battery company, Camel, that was looking to expand its operations into the United States.
There was a discussion about Camel acquiring an idle Exide plant in Tennessee, but negotiations never went very far, with the Chinese company failing to provide all the information Exide requested or to respond to a voicemail message from Koelsch.
Koelsch never raised the matter with Exide's directors, whose chairman had instructed him not to "wait until transactions were beyond exploratory conversations" before bringing them before the board.
In November 2018 Koelsch was told he was being terminated, "obviously without cause," and that the terms of his separation agreement would be honored.
But Exide's board of directors changed their tune in early 2019 , saying Koelsch's termination was being reclassified as "for cause" because he had "dropped the ball" on the potential Camel deal and that Exide would not honor the agreement.
Koelsch's contract included an arbitration clause, and the matter came before JAMS arbitrator F. Carlton King Jr. late last year.
In his Jan. 7 award, King wrote that, although Exide claimed its motives in reclassifying Koelsch's termination had nothing to do with its financial condition, it was "undisputed that in early 2019, Exide was in a liquidity crisis, had been refused additional money by its creditors owners, and was looking to raise capital or find bridge funding.
"It is of note that there were owner/creditors in attendance at the Board meeting when the 'reclassification' decision was made," wrote King. "It is difficult not to conclude that avoiding having to fund a severance package estimated by Exide's lawyers to be worth almost $6 million was the motive for the 'reclassification.'"
Koelsch's petition for confirmation, filed Feb. 22 in Fulton County Superior Court, seeks $3,692,135 in unpaid salary and benefits, $244,215 in prejudgment interest, $23,091 in arbitration fees and the "transfer of certain equity shares" as detailed in his separation agreement.
The petition said that at the conclusion of the arbitration hearing, Exide's current CEO "promised Koelsch that Exide would honor the arbitrator's ruling and pay Koelsch's severance package if Exide lost."
"Exide has not paid Koelsch the sums due under the Final Award," it said.
Koelsch is represented by Jeff Horst and Josh McLaurin of Krevolin & Horst.
Exide is represented by Ichter Davis partner Cary Ichter, who said he did not have permission to discuss the case.
In an interview, Horst said he did not know whether Exide's failure to pay the award was an indication that it planned to challenge it.
"I don't have a good answer for that," said Horst. "I followed up with Cary afterward, and I didn't get any kind of assurances that it would be paid."
Asked whether Exide was able to fund the award, Horst again said he did not know.
"I don't know what their financial condition is," he said. "They're not a publicly traded company."
In the meantime, Koelsch has moved to Minnesota where in January he was named chief digital officer for Polaris, which manufactures off-road recreational vehicles and ATVs.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Court Rejects Plaintiff's Attempt to Amend Claims Against Weapons Manufacturer
State Jury Awards $160M Verdict for Truck's Defective Design That Left Man With Spinal Cord Injury
Mercedes-Benz Hit With Consumer Class Action for Claims of Defective Wheel Configurations
Child Labor Probe Hammers Tennessee Factory, Highlighting Risks to Employers From Feds' Stepped-Up Enforcement
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250