Arbitrator Awards $4M to Fired Ex-CEO of Milton-Based Auto Battery Company
A JAMS arbitrator said Exide Technologies had no basis to claim it fired its former CEO "for cause" and must pay him more than $4 million in severance, fees and interest.
March 06, 2020 at 11:03 AM
4 minute read
The former CEO of a Georgia auto battery manufacturing company has asked a Fulton County judge to enforce an arbitration award of more than $4 million in severance pay, interest and fees as well as shares of company stock, after he was ousted in 2018.
The arbitration award said Victor Koelsch's termination from Exide Technologies was a pretext contrived by a company facing a "liquidity crisis" and looking to save millions by falsely claiming he was fired for cause.
According to the award and petition for enforcement, in 2015 Milton-based Exide Technologies was emerging from bankruptcy and hired Koelsch—a former executive with Michelin Tires—to run the company.
In April 2018 Koelsch and two other Exide employees attending a conference were asked to meet with representatives of a Chinese battery company, Camel, that was looking to expand its operations into the United States.
There was a discussion about Camel acquiring an idle Exide plant in Tennessee, but negotiations never went very far, with the Chinese company failing to provide all the information Exide requested or to respond to a voicemail message from Koelsch.
Koelsch never raised the matter with Exide's directors, whose chairman had instructed him not to "wait until transactions were beyond exploratory conversations" before bringing them before the board.
In November 2018 Koelsch was told he was being terminated, "obviously without cause," and that the terms of his separation agreement would be honored.
But Exide's board of directors changed their tune in early 2019 , saying Koelsch's termination was being reclassified as "for cause" because he had "dropped the ball" on the potential Camel deal and that Exide would not honor the agreement.
Koelsch's contract included an arbitration clause, and the matter came before JAMS arbitrator F. Carlton King Jr. late last year.
In his Jan. 7 award, King wrote that, although Exide claimed its motives in reclassifying Koelsch's termination had nothing to do with its financial condition, it was "undisputed that in early 2019, Exide was in a liquidity crisis, had been refused additional money by its creditors owners, and was looking to raise capital or find bridge funding.
"It is of note that there were owner/creditors in attendance at the Board meeting when the 'reclassification' decision was made," wrote King. "It is difficult not to conclude that avoiding having to fund a severance package estimated by Exide's lawyers to be worth almost $6 million was the motive for the 'reclassification.'"
Koelsch's petition for confirmation, filed Feb. 22 in Fulton County Superior Court, seeks $3,692,135 in unpaid salary and benefits, $244,215 in prejudgment interest, $23,091 in arbitration fees and the "transfer of certain equity shares" as detailed in his separation agreement.
The petition said that at the conclusion of the arbitration hearing, Exide's current CEO "promised Koelsch that Exide would honor the arbitrator's ruling and pay Koelsch's severance package if Exide lost."
"Exide has not paid Koelsch the sums due under the Final Award," it said.
Koelsch is represented by Jeff Horst and Josh McLaurin of Krevolin & Horst.
Exide is represented by Ichter Davis partner Cary Ichter, who said he did not have permission to discuss the case.
In an interview, Horst said he did not know whether Exide's failure to pay the award was an indication that it planned to challenge it.
"I don't have a good answer for that," said Horst. "I followed up with Cary afterward, and I didn't get any kind of assurances that it would be paid."
Asked whether Exide was able to fund the award, Horst again said he did not know.
"I don't know what their financial condition is," he said. "They're not a publicly traded company."
In the meantime, Koelsch has moved to Minnesota where in January he was named chief digital officer for Polaris, which manufactures off-road recreational vehicles and ATVs.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllState Jury Awards $160M Verdict for Truck's Defective Design That Left Man With Spinal Cord Injury
Mercedes-Benz Hit With Consumer Class Action for Claims of Defective Wheel Configurations
Child Labor Probe Hammers Tennessee Factory, Highlighting Risks to Employers From Feds' Stepped-Up Enforcement
6 minute readPanel, Affirming $25M Default Judgment, Rules Absent Defendants Must Prove Apportionment
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250