State Solicits Nominees for Blackwell Post Despite Challenge to Canceled Election
The process to replace the justice is on a breathtakingly fast track.
March 06, 2020 at 05:33 PM
6 minute read
The state Judicial Nominating Commission is soliciting nominations to fill Georgia Supreme Court Justice Keith Blackwell's seat by appointment despite two pending challenges contesting the state's decision to cancel the election while Blackwell remains in office.
On Wednesday—the same day the first of two would-be candidates for Blackwell's seat asked a Fulton County judge to reinstate the canceled election—the JNC, co-chaired by state Republican Party chief deputy general counsel and special assistant attorney general Vincent Russo, sent a letter to members of the State Bar of Georgia soliciting nominations to replace Blackwell. The bar posted the notice on its website Thursday afternoon.
The process to replace Blackwell, who announced his resignation a week ago but won't step down for another nine months, is on a breathtakingly fast track. Nominations for his seat can be submitted no later than Monday.
The Supreme Court of Georgia announced on Feb. 28 that Blackwell had resigned but will remain on the bench until Nov. 18. Blackwell's term ends Dec. 31, and he was scheduled to face reelection on May 19. On March 1, Gov. Brian Kemp's office notified Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger that the governor intends to appoint Blackwell's replacement, and the secretary of state canceled the election for Blackwell's seat.
The search for Blackwell's replacement appears to have been put in motion after two would-be candidates for his seat—Beth Beskin, a partner at the Atlanta offices of Freeman Mathis & Gary, and former U.S. Rep. John Barrow, an Athens attorney—filed separate petitions for writs of mandamus. Both attorneys asked a Fulton County Superior Court judge to direct Raffensperger to reinstate the election for Blackwell's post.
Beskin is represented by Cary Ichter of Atlanta's Ichter Davis, and Barrow by Lester Tate, a partner at Cartersville's Akin & Tate, and by Poe McGlamry's Chuck Byrd and Buddy Darden.
On Friday, Ichter and Tate questioned the timing of the JNC's push for nominations, especially while their legal challenges are pending.
"This just goes to show you the administrative efficiency the governor's office can bring to a task when they are properly—or improperly—motivated," Ichter said. "If I were selling a car I didn't own, I would try to unload it really fast."
But, he added, "I don't think that should be any sort of impediment to us being able to get the relief we are looking for. … Collecting applications from would-be nominees hardly trumps the right of the people to exercise their choice about who the next Supreme Court justice should be."
Tate, too, found the JNC's timing "extremely irregular."
"It is abundantly clear to me that they are trying to fast track naming someone in order to prevent having to answer for canceling an election," he said.
Kemp's office and Russo did not respond Friday to requests for comment.
Raffensperger's spokesman has referred questions to the attorney general and the governor. A spokeswoman for Attorney General Chris Carr said that discussions with Raffensperger's office over Blackwell's seat and the canceled election are privileged.
The stepped-up move to name Blackwell's replacement is taking place even though the governor has yet to fill the Supreme Court seat vacated March 1 by retiring Justice Robert Benham. When Benham capsized the race for his seat last December by deciding to step down early and allow Kemp to appoint his replacement, the JNC waited two nearly two months before soliciting nominations to replace him. The JNC accepted nominations for 10 days and gave nominees two additional weeks to submit application packages.
The JNC announced Monday that it submitted a recommended short list of four candidates to Kemp. Benham's last day in office was Feb. 28.
On Thursday, Barrow also separately sought an emergency temporary restraining order that would keep qualifying for Blackwell's seat open. Candidate qualifying ended at noon Friday. But Tate said Superior Court Judge Amy Richardson has the authority to reopen it.
Tate also said Carr's staff lawyers, who are representing the secretary of state, "chose not to appear" for a scheduled Friday telephone conference with the judge about the requested TRO. He said Georgia law dictates a judge can't issue a TRO without five days' notice to the state.
But, he said, "We wanted the record to be clear that we had done everything we possibly could" to qualify to run for Blackwell's seat.
The governor contends he has the right to fill Blackwell's post by appointment.
Under state law, the governor can fill an elected post if it's vacated within six months of a general election. Georgia's judicial general election is May 19. Beskin and Barrow were both barred by the secretary of state from qualifying to run for Blackwell's seat.
Meanwhile, Beskin qualified Friday to challenge Supreme Court Justice Charles Bethel, who is up for reelection this year. "I waited until the last possible moment, because I don't undertake a challenge of an incumbent lightly," she said. But Beskin, who campaigned last year to replace Benham until his surprise announcement that he would step down early, and the cancellation of the election for Blackwell's seat convinced her that she will have to challenge an incumbent to get on the bench.
"The litigation I filed this week in Fulton County Superior Court is ongoing," she said. "I filed that lawsuit as a potential candidate and in my capacity as a voter and elector who will be deprived of my right to elect a Supreme Court justice if the election for Justice Blackwell's seat does not proceed."
However, she said that state law "provides that a candidate, after qualifying, can withdraw her qualifications. Although I don't anticipate doing that, I would re-evaluate that stance should the Blackwell election proceed."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia Appeals Court Cancels Hearing in Election Interference Case Against Trump
3 minute readJustice Department Says Fulton County Jail Conditions Violate Detainee Rights
6 minute readSupreme Court Rejects Push to Move Georgia Case Against Ex-Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows
3 minute read3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250