Jury Piles On $235K in Punitives to $5.5M Legal Malpractice Verdict
The attorney for a man awarded more than $5.5 million for legal malpractice last week asked a jury to approve substantial punitive damages in addition to the judgment.
March 09, 2020 at 04:10 PM
3 minute read
A DeKalb County jury took about three hours to add $235,000 in punitive damages to more than $5.5 million it awarded last week to a man who sued his former lawyer and employer for legal malpractice and other claims.
Jury members said they "dart-boarded" a range of numbers from zero to $850,000 before deciding Atlanta attorney James Potts II should pay the additional money for the trouble he caused plaintiff William Clowdis Jr.
Earlier on Monday, Clowdis' lawyer, Louis Levenson, told the jury Potts has remained defiant and unapologetic for actions that seriously damaged the reputation of Clowdis, who is both an attorney and licensed medical doctor.
Levenson said evidence at the trial demonstrated that Potts deliberately worked to sabotage Clowdis' efforts to get his Virginia medical license reinstated and to seek admission to the state bars of New York and Georgia.
"Mr. Potts has testified that he doesn't feel that he's done anything wrong to Mr. Clowdis," said Levenson, adding Potts has said "he is not sorry … and that he doesn't know what he'd do differently."
Potts' lead counsel, Eugene Butt, implored the jury not to heap further ruin upon his client and colleague whom, who has no insurance and is already unable to pay the $5.5 million judgment entered last week.
"Mr Potts has essentially been bankrupted; he has essentially been destroyed by your verdict," said Butt, a member of Potts' two-man Atlanta firm.
"Mr. Potts is a good man" who has worked to help underrepresented areas and supported others when they needed help, Butt said.
"We think he deserves your mercy and kindness," Butt said.
Potts said his only regrets were in hiring, housing and trusting Clowdis.
On Monday afternoon, Clowdis said he was relieved to have the trial behind him but was under no illusion that the case is over.
"I feel good; it's been a real roller-coaster," said Clowdis. "But I'm sure it'll be a long, long time before I ever see a penny of this judgment."
Potts' other lawyer, Decatur solo R. Edward Furr, said they will file some posttrial motions before readying the case for an appeal.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute readOn the Move: Hunton Andrews Kurth Practice Leader Named Charlotte Managing Partner
6 minute readHusch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250