Meet the GC: Hilary Harp of Habitat for Humanity International
Unlike her counterparts in the private sector, Hilary Harp doesn't spend much time worrying about outside counsel billing rates.
March 09, 2020 at 06:50 AM
4 minute read
The most prevalent image of Habitat for Humanity International is volunteers wielding hammers and nails to build houses, so the group lawyers must do a brisk business in waivers and construction accident cases, right?
Not exactly, explains Hilary Harp, Habitat's vice president for legal and general counsel. She says that the Georgia-based nonprofit supports close to 1,200 local affiliates in the U.S. and other entities in 70 countries. The locals organize the building and selling of houses to low-income residents–so they handle legal matters stemming from the building activities.
Harp, who spent 20 years in big law firms before she joined Habitat in 2007, manages a nine-lawyer team, plus seven staffers who work in governance, risk management and compliance. They tackle large insurance programs, mortgage compliance, new market tax credit allocations, capital lending, along with contracts, fundraising development, tax; litigation and trademark issues. On the international front, they also work on the housing finance market and, in a new venture, housing microfinance.
Unlike her counterparts in the private sector, Harp doesn't spend much time worrying about outside counsel billing rates. "We are very blessed to have a large number of firms that provide pro bono support," she says, noting help from Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, Ford & Harrison, Perkins Coie, DLA Piper, Alston & Bird, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius and others. (Harp said her group does pay for some special projects and litigation.)
She also swings a hammer herself on occasion, saying, "Spending time in the field is really important. It really brings the mission home."
Harp, the daughter of the late Bill Harp of Arnall Golden Gregory, received her undergraduate and law degrees from the University of Georgia, then moved to Washington to work for Perkins Coie. There she worked on government contracts, commercial litigation and environmental matters.
Seeking intellectual property experience, Harp moved back to Atlanta after five years in D.C. But when she arrived at what was then Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy in 1991, she worked on Resolution Trust Corp. matters for the firm's banking practice, along with general commercial litigation.
Harp became a partner and says she "really liked working with clients" on nonlitigation matters–human resources, acquisitions and other necessities to build businesses.
She says she asked herself, "Is this what I want to do for the next 20 years?"
Then she saw an advertisement for a deputy general counsel at Habitat, which was founded in Americus, Georgia, but had opened a headquarters in Atlanta. Liz Blake, the group's general counsel, hired Harp. When Blake retired about five years ago, Harp took over.
Harp says the job offers "more payback to the soul" than her private practice work.
Two myths about Habitat for Humanity, she says, are that former President Jimmy Carter started it, and that "we give away houses."
Carter and his wife, Rosalynn, have been regular volunteers and partners since 1984, but the organization was founded in 1976 after years of development started in Americus, Georgia, by farmer and biblical scholar Clarence Jordan, according to Habitat's website.
"On the farm, Jordan and Habitat's eventual founders Millard and Linda Fuller developed the concept of 'partnership housing,'" the site says. "The concept centered on those in need of adequate shelter working side by side with volunteers to build decent, affordable houses. The houses would be built at no profit. New homeowners' house payments would be combined with no-interest loans provided by supporters and money earned by fundraising to create 'The Fund for Humanity,' which would then be used to build more homes."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers Can Live Worthy of the Calling They Have Received and The Gifts With Which They Have Been Blessed
Atlanta-Based Fearless Fund Ends Black-Only Entrepreneurial Grant Contest After Settling Civil Rights Lawsuit
Can You Contract Away Your Right to Leave Bad Google Reviews? Court of Appeals Set to Decide
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250