With Threat of Coronavirus Looming, Eleventh Circuit Cancels Judicial Conference
Chief Judge Ed Carnes said that in the face of the evolving threat of the novel coronavirus, it was "necessary and prudent" to cancel the May judicial conference in Atlanta.
March 11, 2020 at 06:04 PM
3 minute read
The evolving threat of the COVID-19 virus has prompted the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit to cancel its May judicial conference, Chief Judge Ed Carnes announced Wednesday.
The circuit's 2020 conference—which brings together federal judges from Georgia, Florida and Alabama, as well as lawyers who practice in the circuit—was scheduled to take place from May 6-9 in Atlanta. The Eleventh Circuit conferences are held biennially and generally qualify as continuing legal education credits for the attorneys and judges who attend.
Carnes said in a news release that he decided to cancel the conference given warnings by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp that canceling the conference was "necessary and prudent in the interest of all those who would have attended."
Conferences in other industries have been canceled across the globe as well to mitigate the spread of COVID-19, also known as coronavirus.
Carnes said he hopes to reschedule the conference sometime in 2021, "if circumstances permit," given the importance of judicial conferences to the bench and the bar.
Carnes canceled the conference a day after the Supreme Court of Georgia issued a court order temporarily waiving the six-hour, in person continuing legal education requirement for active members of the State Bar of Georgia. The waiver is effective immediately and, for now, will remain in place through March 31. Bar members will still be required to complete the 12-hour CLE requirement but may do so through self-study, in-house, or online seminars.
Meanwhile, on Wednesday, the clerk's office of the Georgia Court of Appeals held an all-day drill with a skeleton staff to test its ability to continue court functions in an emergency.
Court clerk Steve Castlen said 35 people from the clerk's office and court administration worked remotely, leaving just three staff members in the courthouse. Castlen said that the appellate court has been preparing for several years to install technology that allows all the judges, their staff attorneys and administrative assistants to work remotely.
"As of today, every person in our office is able to work from home to accomplish every task needed to keep our systems running—except one," Castlen said Wednesday. "The one thing we cannot do from home is collect a paper filing from a pro se person who walks in with paper in hand, and hands it to one of us."
Castlen said that whether and how the court may conduct oral arguments is "something we are monitoring" and is under discussion by the en banc court. No oral arguments are scheduled for March, he said.
"Our term [of art] is 'continuity of operations' during an emergency no matter what it is," he Castlen added. "Coronavirus just happens to be the emergency we are dealing with today."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSupreme Court of Georgia Accepts 2 Petitions for Voluntary Discipline With 2-Year Suspension, 1 Voluntary Surrender of License
Trending Stories
- 1'There is No Time to Waste': Matt Gaetz Withdraws From AG Nomination
- 2The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 3Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 4In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
- 5Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250