'All Hands on Deck' for Labor and Employment Firms Facing Flood of Employer Questions
Lawyers at Jackson Lewis, Fisher & Phillips and Littler Mendelson are fielding client coronavirus questions on a 24-hour basis and triaging them based on their urgency.
March 13, 2020 at 07:51 PM
6 minute read
As the global COVID-19 outbreak has escalated into a pandemic, labor and employment law firms have been inundated with calls from clients urgently seeking real-time guidance on how to respond to the fast-moving threat.
"All hands on deck," was the uniform reply from leaders of three national labor and employment firms when asked about client inquiries over the coronavirus. Those firm leaders include Will Anthony at Jackson Lewis, Roger Quillen at Fisher & Phillips and Tom Bender at Littler Mendelson.
All said their firms' task-force lawyers are fielding questions on a 24-hour basis and triaging them based on their urgency because client worries are at an unprecedented level.
Alka Ramchandani-Raj, a leader of Littler's coronavirus task force, said that in early February she and the firm's other workplace safety lawyers were fielding about 150 client calls or emails a day from clients regarding the outbreak.
Client demand has quickly ratcheted up since then, and lawyers handling all aspects of employment law are in demand. On Friday, Ramchandani-Raj led a webinar that attracted 5,000 clients eager to learn the latest on what to do in case of personnel exposed to or infected by the virus, medical privacy issues, employee leave policies, wage and hour law and potential furloughs.
"A lot of employment attorneys right now are straight-out crazy busy," said New York legal recruiter Katie Babcock of Shapiro Legal Search. "Their employer clients are really just freaking out about how to handle potential layoffs or remote employees working from home, furloughs — anything."
With social distancing now top of mind, the critical concerns for organizations have quickly shifted from questions about employee travel and hosting large events to asking whether they need to close offices or operations and how to deal with potentially sick employees, the lawyers said.
Clients across the board and in all industry sectors are seeking guidance, they added.
"Our lawyers' phones are ringing off the hook," said Quillen at Fisher & Phillips. For instance, he said, at 6:05 on Friday morning a Fisher & Phillips lawyer received a call from a school administrator who had to decide that day whether to cancel classes for the entire school system.
"That was just one call. It's happening every day, all day," Quillen said. "And the questions are morphing daily."
As things have escalated, said Ramachandani-Raj, she's now hearing questions such as: "Do I have to shut down my company if my employee has been infected–or even exposed?" Clients are even asking about secondary and tertiary exposure, she added.
While firms are seeing demand from all types of industries, health care and hospitality clients have particular concerns. "They have operations that are going to be ongoing while the pandemic is going on," Ramchandani-Raj said.
'Flying Blind'
Organizations are struggling to develop action plans for the unprecedented pandemic, the law firm leaders said. The shortage of testing kits in the United States means the scale and severity of the threat remain undetermined. "We don't know how serious the threat is or how many people are infected, so business leaders don't know what to do," Quillen said.
"The absence of testing and absence of data really has the whole country flying blind," he added. "Without much guidance from the authorities on this, clients are reaching out to us to find out the best policies and practices."
The past week has seen an accelerating wave of business and school closures, along with state and citywide restrictions in New York, Texas, California and elsewhere on how many people can congregate in one place.
Now organizations want to know how to handle employees working remotely—or furloughs, pay and WARN reporting requirements when faced with shutting offices, schools and other operations. Remote work raises wage and hour issues for companies, such as tracking time for hourly staff, Jackson Lewis' Anthony explained.
And there are HIPAA issues for clients who worry that a worker may have been exposed to the virus. "We counsel clients to ask them to stay out of the workplace until they've been cleared medically," he said.
There are union issues as well, Anthony said. Many colleges have sent their students home, he explained, and their food service workers, maintenance staff and other employees are often unionized. "That's keeping labor lawyers busy," he said.
"It's touching almost all our practice areas—even our litigators," Anthony said, now that courts are restricting access or closing.
New issues are arising almost daily. Several states have temporarily closed schools, prompting employers to ask how to handle leave policies for parents with kids at home.
"We are telling employers they should suspend their attendance policies right now," Ramchandani-Raj said, adding that some are creating new sick-leave policies for the duration of the pandemic.
Accelerating Urgency
Within the last two or three weeks, the national labor and employment firms have pulled together the coronavirus task forces of subject-matter experts across industries and practices to address clients' wide-ranging concerns on a 24-hour basis.
Quillen said he could pinpoint the date when Fisher & Phillips lawyers realized the urgency of the issue for clients to Feb. 26. That's when he was in Ft. Lauderdale for the firm's annual Internal Counsel conference on cutting-edge issues in workplace law.
Quillen asked the firm's clients and other guests that evening how many were concerned that the coronavirus outbreak might affect their business.
"Every hand went up," he said, so the firm scheduled an extra session addressing the outbreak for 7:45 a.m. the next morning. He added that the firm's top expert, a workplace safety lawyer, stayed up all night doing research and putting together a presentation.
Just about every attendee showed up the next morning, Quillen said. "The phones are ringing because people need action plans."
Jack Newsham contributed to this report.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn The Move: Polsinelli Adds Health Care Litigator in Nashville, Ex-SEC Enforcer Joins BCLP in Atlanta
6 minute readAkerman Opens Charlotte Office With Focus on Renewable Energy, Data Center Practices
4 minute readNelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250