Justice Blackwell's Would-Be Opponent Seeks Emergency Order to Reinstate Election
The motion calls on the appeals court to set aside a Fulton County judge's ruling affirming Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger's right to cancel the election.
March 18, 2020 at 03:11 PM
4 minute read
An emergency motion was filed Wednesday asking the Georgia Court of Appeals for a writ of mandamus to reinstate the canceled election for state Supreme Court Justice Keith Blackwell's seat.
The motion calls on the appeals court to set aside Fulton County Superior Court Judge Emily Richardson's Monday ruling affirming Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger's right to cancel the election so Gov. Brian Kemp can nominate Blackwell's replacement.
The underlying mandamus petitions were filed by former U.S. Rep. John Barrow, who is an Athens attorney, and Beth Beskin, a partner at the Atlanta offices of Freeman, Mathis & Gary. Both wish to run for Blackell's seat.
Barrow counsel Wade "Trip" Tomlinson, one of a team of Pope McGlamry lawyers representing the prospective candidate, said an emergency review is critical because the canceled election was scheduled to take place May 19, and absentee ballots must be available at least 45 days before the election.
Blackwell's term ends Dec. 31. The associate justice resigned Feb. 26, effective Nov. 19. Kemp and the state attorney general have contended that, because Blackwell resigned within six months of the May 19 election, the governor has the authority to choose a replacement.
The emergency petition contends Richardson's March 13 ruling upends the Georgia Supreme Court's 2016 ruling in Clark v. Deal.
In an opinion written by current Chief Justice Harold Melton, the high court held that a vacancy is defined as "an unoccupied office in which there is no incumbent legally qualified" to hold the post and exercise the judicial powers of the office. The case was an unsuccessful challenge of then-Gov. Nathan Deal's appointment of three judges to fill three new seats established by the Georgia General Assembly on the state Court of Appeals.
Richardson had "no power" to overrule Clark v. Deal and "offered no rationale to reconcile the substantial difference between a 'vacancy' where there is an occupied office versus an unoccupied one," Tomlinson argued.
Tomlinson also argued that an accepted resignation does not create an immediate vacancy for the governor to fill.
Tomlinson also challenged the state attorney general's reliance on a 1992 unofficial AG opinion holding that a governor's acceptance of a Supreme Court justice's resignation causes the seat to become vacant as a matter of law.
"Let's be clear here," said Tomlinson co-counsel Lester Tate, a former president of the State Bar of Georgia and a partner at Akin & Tate in Cartersville. "An unofficial AG's opinion is no more than an interoffice memo, and it should not trump the Constitution or the ability of the people to elect a Supreme Court justice."
A spokeswoman for Attorney General Chris Carr, whose staff represents Blackwell and Raffensperger, has repeatedly declined to comment on the matter.
Michael Moore, former U.S. attorney for the Middle District of Georgia and another member of Barrow's Pope McGlamry team, said, "It should come as no surprise that the governor, just as when he was the former secretary of state, is continuing his pattern of voter suppression."
"Back then, he did it by invoking his power to block access for thousands to the ballot box," Moore said. "Now he is blocking the voters from having the chance to vote in a constitutionally required election with a few tricky strokes of his gubernatorial appointment pen. Our client trusts the voters to choose their Supreme Court justices."
Beskin on Wednesday voiced her own concern that if Richardson's ruling is affirmed, "Georgia will no longer have judicial elections, or at least will no longer have elections for Supreme Court justices."
A Fulton County senior superior court judge, in a letter to the Daily Report Wednesday, argued that Kemp's maneuvering to replace Blackwell by appointment rather than election constitutes "a suppression of Georgia voters' rights."
Senior Judge Melvin Westmoreland said that, when he retired in 2010, "I guess I could have then announced my retirement effective the day before the election so as to allow the governor to anoint my successor, regardless of the voters' choice."
"If that type of reasoning prevails, Georgia voters will have lost our constitutional right to vote for judges," Westmoreland said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia Appeals Court Cancels Hearing in Election Interference Case Against Trump
3 minute readJustice Department Says Fulton County Jail Conditions Violate Detainee Rights
6 minute readSupreme Court Rejects Push to Move Georgia Case Against Ex-Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows
3 minute read3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250