Fight for Justice Blackwell's Seat Heads to Ga. Supreme Court, Teeing Up Potential Conflict of Interest
The Georgia Court of Appeals on Thursday transferred an emergency appeal over whether to reinstate an election for state Supreme Court Justice Keith Blackwell's seat to the state Supreme Court for a ruling.
March 19, 2020 at 01:19 PM
5 minute read
The Georgia Court of Appeals punted an emergency appeal to the state Supreme Court Thursday intended to reinstate an election for the seat held by Justice Keith Blackwell.
The appellate court's refusal to take up former U.S. Rep. John Barrow's appeal of the state's decision to cancel the scheduled election for Blackwell's seat sets up a potential conflict of interest for Blackwell and his fellow justices.
Barrow's lawyers moved to disqualify or recuse all nine justices from considering the appeal late Thursday, citing the state Code of Judicial Ethics, which requires judges to disqualify themselves in any proceeding in which their impartiality might reasonably be questioned.
Blackwell, who remains a current member of the court because his Feb. 26 resignation doesn't take effect until Nov. 19, was also subpoenaed as a witness and submitted stipulated testimony in a Fulton County Superior Court hearing on Barrow's mandamus petition. Blackwell was represented by the state attorney general's office, which also represents Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, the target of Barrow's mandamus petition.
Barrow lawyers also said the impartiality of the Blackwell's fellow justices "might reasonably be questioned by a skeptical public."
On Thursday, the state appeals court handed off the case to the state Supreme Court, while acknowledging it may have jurisdiction. A 2016 law expanded the appeals court's jurisdiction to include all equity cases, which it acknowledged could include Barrow's mandamus petition seeking to reinstate the election. The appeals court said the Georgia Constitution gives the state's highest court "exclusive appellate jurisdiction" over all election contests, including challenges involving candidates for office and election results.
The election was nixed on March 1, the day before qualifying began, after Gov. Brian Kemp notified Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger that he will fill Blackwell's seat by appointment after accepting the justice's resignation, which will not take effect until November.
"In the present appeal, the grant or denial of mandamus relief appears to be merely ancillary to the underlying election contest," the appeals court order said. "Consequently, the Supreme Court may have jurisdiction over any appeal of the superior court's order denying Barrow's petition for a writ of mandamus."
On Thursday, Barrow co-counsel Michael Moore, a former U.S. attorney for the Middle District of Georgia, said that maneuvers to appoint rather than elect Blackwell's replacement "already gives the appearance that a group of insiders have determined that hand-selecting a justice and protecting a judicial pension is more important than protecting the people of Georgia's right to vote."
That suspicion would only be enhanced if sitting justices were to hear a case directly involving someone they work with every day, Moore said. "That's a little bit like asking the chickens in the henhouse to vote on whether one of them can keep its golden egg."
Moore is one of a team of Pope McGlamry lawyers representing Barrow. Lester Tate, a partner at Cartersville's Akin & Tate and a former president of the State Bar of Georgia, is co-counsel.
Fulton County Senior Judge Melvin Westmoreland, a former president of the state's Council of Superior Court Judges, predicted Thursday that Blackwell will disqualify himself from considering an appeal over whether Gov. Brian Kemp can appoint his replacement. Blackwell submitted his resignation to Kemp on Feb. 26 while notifying the governor he will remain in office for nine more months.
But Westmoreland also suggested that the entire state Supreme Court bench should recuse.
"Whether the public perceives the other justices as being able to impartially decide the matter so important to one of their companions is difficult to gauge," Westmoreland said. "In an abundance of caution, it may be in the Supreme Court's best interest to consider a process which allows judges from outside their bench to hear and decide this case."
Former state Supreme Court Justice Leah Sears also weighed in on Wednesday, saying she was disappointed that, for now, there will be no election for Blackwell's seat. "The position of a Supreme Court justice, in general, is an elected one, even though that doesn't happen," she said.
The appeals court's move came only 24 hours after Barrow's lawyers filed an emergency motion to set aside a Fulton Superior Court judge's order affirming the secretary of state's decision to cancel the election.
Barrow, who intended to run for Blackwell's vacant seat, sought a mandamus writ ordering Raffensperger to reopen qualifying and reinstate the election. A second would-be candidate—former state legislator and Mathis Freeman & Gary partner Beth Beskin—filed a similar mandamus petition after she, too, was barred from qualifying to run. Beskin filed a similar appeal as Barrow Thursday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGeorgia Appeals Court Cancels Hearing in Election Interference Case Against Trump
3 minute readJustice Department Says Fulton County Jail Conditions Violate Detainee Rights
6 minute readSupreme Court Rejects Push to Move Georgia Case Against Ex-Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows
3 minute read3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250