Pandemic Prompts Legal Efficiency I Hope Will Last Beyond the Crisis
A criminal defense lawyer sees a process that would normally take weeks of haggling get resolved in a few hours. Also, why can't courts always allow arraignments to be waived?
March 19, 2020 at 06:31 PM
4 minute read
When I started my career as a prosecutor in DeKalb County in the mid '90s, I drafted indictments, negotiated pleas, arraigned defendants and tried cases all without the benefit of email, a cell phone, or even Windows (back then we typed everything into MS-DOS). Since then, I've survived Y2K, 9/11 and three months in the Fulton County District Attorney's Office (enough said). And I've seen a lot of innovations outside the courtroom find their way inside, especially e-filing, which saves me time, money and the unnecessary stress of hoping my envelope arrived on time.
Now, in this crisis, we've seen necessity breed pragmatism. Chief Justice Melton will forever be remembered for his foresightedness in declaring a statewide judicial emergency. And, while it has taken some counties a bit more time, and maybe a call from the Judicial Qualifications Commission, judges across this state are taking steps to ensure that the rights of criminal defendants are protected, even as they insulate the public, defendants, lawyers and court staff from exposure to COVID-19 by canceling nonessential (noncustodial) court hearings or allowing lawyers to make status announcements by email.
Because most of my clients are not in custody, their nonessential hearings have been continued. However, I have a handful of clients in jail. On Wednesday, I e-filed a bond motion in DeKalb County for one of those clients. After emailing a copy of the motion to the judge's office, I received an email back setting a telephonic hearing (as I requested) for Thursday afternoon. The prosecutor and I immediately began negotiating a consent bond and at 5 p.m., we were able to come to an agreement to present to the judge. The process, which normally takes weeks of haggling and scheduling before the motion is actually heard, was resolved through email to chambers in a few hours.
I've heard similar stories from Fulton County and Cobb County, and they are consistent. Everyone is working together to get things done, and they are doing so efficiently. We are moving cases through emails, conference calls and videoconferencing, and the public is benefiting.
While I am really proud of how efficiently everyone is working together, I am not looking forward to when things go back to "normal." Normal for me involves a lot of wasted time. At least once a week I drive an hour in traffic (each way) to sit through a calendar that takes a judge an hour to call, just to say, "not guilty." That's three hours to speak for three seconds. I am not the only criminal defense lawyer who is frustrated by these lengthy and inefficient hearings—plenty of arraignment calendars have at least a hundred people on them. That is a lot of lawyers driving around.
Thankfully some judges, in some counties, allow lawyers to "waive arraignment," which means we can file a document that says "not guilty" instead of wasting hours to say it in person. But there is no rule requiring judges to accept a written waiver of arraignment, and when judges do allow it, there's no consensus on how the process should work.
Because I've enjoyed not sitting in hours of traffic, dodging potholes, walking through metal detectors and sitting in courtrooms for hours to literally say "not guilty," I will be sending letters to the Councils of State and Superior Court Judges asking them to adopt a uniform rule that authorizes lawyers to waive arraignment.
This pandemic has been an expensive lesson in necessity. Just as Windows replaced DOS, emails replaced fax machines, and e-filing has begun to replace mailing in envelopes, arraignment calendars need to give way to a system that spares judges, prosecutors, defendants, and their attorneys from using half their day in court to say two little words.
Noah H. Pines, a partner at Atlanta's Ross & Pines, heads the firm's criminal defense and appellate practice.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWho Got the Work: 16 Lawyers Appointed to BioLab Class Action Litigation
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250