Fisher & Phillips Rapidly Launches 'Shelter-in-Place' Practice
It's a sign of the times. The firm's task force to help clients determine if they can stay open was just a concept Thursday. The firm launched it Monday.
March 24, 2020 at 02:45 PM
4 minute read
In a sign of the times, Atlanta-based labor & employment firm Fisher & Phillips on Monday launched a task force to address an issue that didn't even exist until last week: What companies qualify for the "essential business" exemption from rapidly proliferating shelter-in-place orders?
Fisher & Phillips launched the new practice just hours before Atlanta's mayor issued a "shelter-in-place" order at midnight on Monday that effectively shut down activities by all city businesses except those deemed essential.
Last week, San Francisco issued the first shelter-in-place order, effective March 16. About 10 states and numerous other cities made similar orders.
Roger Quillen, the national workplace law firm's chairman, said it was only last Thursday that firm lawyers considered setting up an essential business task force. "Our phones were burning up" last week, he said, with calls from worried clients asking whether they could stay open.
City and state directives on what constitutes an essential business can be confusing and vague, plus there is variation by jurisdiction, so it's an area where clients are seeking guidance, Quillen said.
"This is a practice area that didn't exist for our firm when we started asking ourselves about it on Thursday," he said. "It was a concept then, we had the task force in place on Friday, and a number of people worked all weekend."
By late Monday the new practice was up and running, with a resource center on the firm's website that tracks "shelter-in-place" orders by state and city as they are announced. (Fisher & Phillips had already revamped its website's homepage to exclusively feature its COVID-19 resources and client guidance.)
That's how fast things are happening in workplace law, Quillen said, adding that the firm has never started a new practice initiative so quickly.
Some essential businesses are obvious across jurisdictions–for instance, health care, grocery stores, banks and telecommunication companies. But the rules are not as clear-cut for others, such as auto dealers, Quillen said.
Many car dealers have repair facilities, which are widely considered an essential business, he explained. Now that many carless urban-dwellers, such as millennials, consider public transit and rideshares too risky, there may be a rising need for car purchases—including used ones.
"We're finding that many businesses may qualify for the exempt categories because they're providing vital life services," Quillen said.
Clients initially ask what the rules are in a jurisdiction and whether their company fits the exemption, Quillen said. If it is not directly addressed, then they may want to petition an administrative agency for a broader exemption. Failing that, some are considering whether they can seek injunctive relief from a court.
Other national labor and employment firms, such as Littler Mendelson, Jackson Lewis and Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak & Stewart, also have assembled extensive COVID-19 practices and offer copious online resources to assist clients. But representatives from these three firms said they hadn't started a practice area per se to address the new deluge of shelter-in-place orders.
An Ogletree representative said the firm is addressing client questions about shelter-in-place orders via its multi-disciplinary coronavirus rapid response team and online resource center.
Littler doesn't have a specific "shelter-in-place" practice, but the COVID-19 task force it started in January offers "comprehensive resources and guidance," a spokesperson said. Jackson Lewis similarly has a COVID-19 task force "to help clients decipher all of the confusing guidance coming out on a daily basis," a spokesperson said.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAkerman Opens Charlotte Office With Focus on Renewable Energy, Data Center Practices
4 minute readNelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
7 minute readEx-Deputy AG Trusts U.S. Legal System To Pull Country Through Times of Duress
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Attorney Responds to Outten & Golden Managing Partner's Letter on Dropped Client
- 2Attracted to Thompson Hine's Fee Flexibility, Morgan Lewis Litigator Switches Firms in Chicago
- 3Phila. Attorney Hit With 5-Year Suspension for Mismanaging Firm and Mishandling Cases
- 4Simpson Thacher Replenishes London Ranks With Latest Linklaters Defection
- 5Holland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250