Tex McIver's Insurers Settle Wrongful Death Claim by Dead Wife's Estate
Attorney Robin Frazer Clark, who represented the administrator of Diane McIver's estate, said she had sought $10 million from Tex McIver's insurers after McIver, now serving life for murder, contended that his wife's shooting was an accident.
March 25, 2020 at 04:09 PM
4 minute read
The lawyer who sued Atlanta attorney and convicted killer Claud "Tex" McIver on behalf of the estate of his dead wife has confidentially settled a wrongful death suit with McIver and his insurers.
Robin Frazer Clark, who represents the administrator of Diane McIver's estate, confirmed the confidential settlement Wednesday. The settlement resolves a wrongful death claim Clark brought against McIver on behalf of his dead wife's estate in 2018 after McIver was convicted of her murder and sentenced to life in prison.
Clark said the McIvers' insurance policy had a $10 million policy ceiling and that she sought that full amount. "I am confident we would have proven that the economic value alone of Diane's life was over $20 million, and that's a small part of the value of someone's life," she said. "The true value of someone's life is the non-economic value."
Diane McIver was the president of Corey Enterprises in Atlanta when her husband, then a partner at the Atlanta offices of Fisher & Phillips, fatally shot her from the backseat of their SUV as family friend Dani Jo Carter was driving them home from a weekend at their Putnam County ranch in 2016.
Clark sued McIver on behalf of estate administrator Mary Margaret Oliver. Oliver was appointed by the Fulton County Probate Court as the estate administrator after McIver was charged with his wife's murder and removed as her estate executor. Diane McIver has no surviving children or family.
Carter also was named as a defendant in the wrongful death suit. Clark said negligence claims brought against Carter were dismissed as part of the estate's settlement with McIver's insurers.
But during the litigation, Carter filed a cross-claim against Tex McIver which is still pendingl Efforts to mediate the dispute so far have failed, Clark said. Carter's attorney, Lee Davis, couldn't be reached for comment.
Clark said the global settlement also resolves a separate federal declaratory judgment action that McIver's insurers, Chubb National Insurance and Great Northern Insurance, filed after McIver was convicted, that sought relief from any obligation to defend McIver against the wrongful death claim asserted by Diane McIver's estate.
Clark said that she and the insurance companies' counsel entered into mediation after the Georgia Court of Appeals in a case of first impression last year affirmed a lower court ruling that Diane McIver's estate could sue the spouse who killed her.
James Scarbrough of Atlanta's Mabry & McClelland, who represented Tex McIver and his insurers, couldn't be reached for comment.
Clark said that the estate's wrongful death claim was bolstered by a provision of the couple's insurance policy that included coverage where a spouse was injured in an accident where the other spouse was driving and found to have negligently caused the injury. Clark said she secured an admission from Tex McIver "that he negligently killed his wife." McIver has always insisted that he never intended to shoot his spouse and that the gun he was holding discharged accidentally.
"Tex admitted every allegation in the [wrongful death] complaint," she said.
Although the jury that heard the murder case against McIver rejected his defense that the shooting was accidental, Clark said McIver's insurers contended the lawyer's murder conviction solidified their position that Diane McIver's death wasn't covered by the insurance policy's accident provisions.
But Clark said she insisted she would try the wrongful death case if no satisfactory settlement deal was reached.
She also said she assured the insurance company lawyers that she would use Tex McIver's own statements to seek a judgment on the pleadings. "Once I won judgment on the pleadings, the only issue for the jury would have been the full value of the life of Diane McIver," she said. "We never got to that point."
Greg Land contributed to this article.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrying to Reason With Hurricane Season: Mediating First Party Property Insurance Claims
'I Thank You': Attorney Leverages Daily Report Article to Turn $42K Offer Into $600K Settlement
7 minute readFirst Came the SEC, Now Investors Raise Allegations Against Acadia Healthcare
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 2Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 3Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 4Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 5Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250