Ga. Supreme Court Lets Stand Reversal of Game Machine Gambling Conviction
Thursday's action reboots a federal lawsuit filed against the district attorney who brought the underlying charges.
March 26, 2020 at 07:08 PM
4 minute read
The Supreme Court of Georgia on Thursday announced it will not review a state appellate decision throwing out the felony gambling conviction of a 74-year-old restaurant owner forced into bankruptcy after he was prosecuted for having coin-operated game machines in his establishment.
Macon Circuit District Attorney David Cooke sought to reinstate the felony conviction of Ronnie Bartlett, the owner of the now-defunct Captain Jack's Crab Shack in Peach County. The high court's decision to deny Cooke's petition for a writ of certiorari lets stand the unanimous reversal last year of Bartlett's 2018 conviction and five-year sentence for having nine coin-operated gaming machines in his restaurant.
On Friday, Cooke contended that both the state Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court were mistaken and that he agrees with the Peach County judge and jury who determined that Bartlett broke the law. Cooke said he will file a motion for reconsideration "in hopes that the Supreme Court will remedy this situation."
Cooke also doubled down on his intention to continue prosecuting gaming machine cases, contending that they "go hand in hand" with other crimes such as money laundering, tax evasion, and public corruption. "Nothing in this ruling affects our ability to hold defendants accountable who break those laws," he continued. "We will not turn a blind eye to these crimes."
Bartlett is one of a long line of defendants Cooke has charged with felony gambling offenses associated with coin-operated gaming equipment. Bartlett is the first who chose to fight rather than enter a plea, said his attorneys, Chris Anulewicz and former Georgia Attorney General Mike Bowers of the Atlanta offices of Balch & Bingham.
"It is disappointing but not surprising that the district attorney refuses to acknowledge the law that exists, the Court of Appeal's affirmation of that law, and the Supreme Court;s affirmation of the Court of Appeals," Anulewicz said Friday. "It is a sad day when an officer of the court puts his own agenda ahead of the law."
The two lawyers said the appellate court's reversal of Bartlett's conviction last year was the first step in halting to what they contend is a pattern of similar, lucrative—and potentially abusive—prosecutions across the state that have been promulgated for nearly two decades by Decatur attorney Michael Lambros as a hired gun for local prosecutors.
Multiple district attorneys, including Cooke, have retained Lambros as a special assistant DA to seize coin-operated video games in raids on convenience stores and restaurants, file criminal charges, and then push for the forfeiture of millions of dollars in seized assets that are eventually funneled into prosecutors' coffers.
Bartlett's restaurant was shut down in 2015 after Lambros, while working for Cooke, seized the restaurant's coin-operated games, according to a federal lawsuit that Bartlett and his wife filed against the two prosecutors in 2016.
Thursday's action by the high court reboots Bartlett's federal suit, which was stayed pending the resolution of the criminal charges. On Friday, U.S. District Judge Steve Jones issued a show cause order as to why he shouldn't allow Bartlett's four-year-old claims to move forward. Cooke said he will likely ask Jones for additional time to renew his motion to dismiss the case. "Whether or not the stay is lifted won't really have an effect on the ultimate outcome, and that is that we will be victorious,'" he said.
The suit claims that when Bartletts' lawyers notified Cooke and Lambros of their intent to sue over the arrest, Cooke told them he had not planned to prosecute the couple but, after receiving the notice, intended to "prioritize their case for prosecution."
The suit also accuses the prosecutors of using the unwarranted threat of criminal prosecution to illegally seize financial assets and bolster the DA's discretionary fund.
Cooke called the allegations false, and said he intends to prove it.
The commercial gambling charges against Bartlett and other merchants were based on the premise that winners of the coin-operated games received cash prizes for playing games that require no skill on the part of the player—a misdemeanor offense under state law. Bartlett was charged with multiple felonies.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJustice Department Says Fulton County Jail Conditions Violate Detainee Rights
6 minute readSupreme Court Rejects Push to Move Georgia Case Against Ex-Trump Chief of Staff Mark Meadows
3 minute read3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250