COVID-19 Forces Ga. Supreme Court to Schedule Its First Virtual Court Sessions
Although the chief justice's statewide judicial emergency declaration is slated to expire April 13, the high court bench, except for the chief justice, will hear arguments from home beginning April 20.
March 27, 2020 at 02:59 PM
4 minute read
For the first time in its history, the Supreme Court of Georgia will convene virtual court sessions next month to hear oral arguments in 19 cases.
Faced with keeping the courts in operation while COVID-19 continues to spread, Chief Justice Harold Melton on Friday announced the high court's plans for the virtual sessions, which will take place from April 20-24.
Over the course of the week, attorneys will argue 19 cases before the justices, who will be in front of their computers in their homes. Except for Melton, who will take his seat on the bench at the Nathan Deal Judicial Center in downtown Atlanta.
The virtual court sessions are scheduled to begin a week after Melton's statewide judicial emergency order is currently slated to end. On March 14, Melton declared a statewide judicial emergency, effective through April 13, to curtail the spread of the coronavirus to those who work in or are required to appear in court.
Melton's order asked judges across Georgia to prioritize matters such as domestic abuse restraining orders, juvenile court delinquency detention hearings and emergency removal matters, mental health commitment hearings, and cases "where an immediate liberty or safety concern is present requiring the attention of the court as soon as the court is available. Because Georgia does not have a unified court system, Melton must rely on his powers of persuasion rather than legal authority to curtail other court operations.
In his public announcement of the virtual court sessions, Melton expressed his hope that "it will go off without a hitch," but also asked for patience "if we run into some technological glitches."
The high court will use the videoconferencing service Zoom to link appellate lawyers and the bench. The high court also will livestream the virtual arguments over the internet, including to the general public. The Supreme Court has livestreamed oral arguments for several years.
Hansen said that, instead of seeing all the justices seated on the bench, online viewers will see each justice and the arguing lawyers in an enclosed video panel. Hansen said it should resemble the opening of the old television sitcom, "The Brady Bunch."
The April calendar also will include cases that were originally scheduled to take place this month but were canceled after Melton declared a judicial emergency.
Since early March, the chief justice has taken the lead in crafting the state judiciary's response to the pandemic. Melton is sitting in on Gov. Brian Kemp's coronavirus task force meetings, and on March 9 he notified the state's judges he will coordinate the judiciary's response to the outbreak.
The next day, the state Supreme Court issued an order temporarily waiving the in-person continuing legal education requirement for members of the State Bar of Georgia. Melton then took the unprecedented step of canceling all tours of the new judicial center until further notice, suspended swearing-in ceremonies for attorneys and asked that only those directly involved in oral arguments attend court sessions.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMaryland Atty Pushes Judge to Grant Discovery in Reverse Discrimination Suit Against King & Spalding
4 minute readJustice Department Says Fulton County Jail Conditions Violate Detainee Rights
6 minute readHow Big Law Congressional Investigation Practices Will Stay Busy in 2025
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250