Georgia Weighs Options as Other States Delay Bar Exams
Law students have been lobbying for an emergency diploma privilege that allows them to bypass the bar exam, but jurisdictions are leaning toward postponing the test until the fall.
March 30, 2020 at 03:08 PM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
Georgia bar admissions authorities are simultaneously preparing to hold its July bar exam while determining whether it'd be feasible to postpone the exam to the fall, as some states have started to do.
New York on March 27 became the first jurisdiction to officially postpone the July bar exam, clearing the path for others to follow suit, including Massachusetts and Connecticut, which both announced Monday that they will also postpone the exam to an as-yet-undermined date in the fall.
Those announcements come after the National Conference of Bar Examiners, which develops the test, said that it will offer a separate exam in the fall for jurisdictions that can't or don't want to move ahead with the test in July amid the coronavirus outbreak.
"This is a time of great uncertainty," said Heidi Faezna, the director of admissions for Georgia's Office of Bar Admissions in an email to the Daily Report.
"The Supreme Court of Georgia and Georgia Board of Bar Examiners are working with the National Conference of Bar Examiners and other jurisdictions to find flexible solutions that will protect the safety of bar applicants and employees while continuing to ensure competent legal services for the public," she added.
"While we are making every effort to find a solution that allows applicants to sit for the Georgia Bar Examination and become licensed without undue delay, our decision depends, in part, on the availability of test materials licensed by NCBE and the availability of a testing site of sufficient size to accommodate our exam at normal or appropriate 'social distancing' seating capacity. We must also take into consideration any federal, state, or local restrictions likely to be in place on the exam dates."
Faenza said Georgia authorities hope to be able to announce a decision about the July exam, as well as a possible fall administration of the exam, following NCBE's May 5 announcement regarding the availability of its test materials for a July exam.
The move to fall bar exams is distressing many law students, who fear additional postponements and cancellations if the COVID-19 pandemic drags on as some public health officials predict. Those changes could put their professional future on hold for the foreseeable future, they say.
"We're pretty petrified," said Nicole Buckley, a third-year student at the City University of New York School of Law. "I have friends from all different law schools, and pretty much every one is in the same boat. The decision to cancel the July bar exam is devastating and really detrimental to all of us—whether it's because we were relying on bar grant money for funding for the summer, or for prospective employment."
Buckley, like many graduating law students, favors an emergency diploma privilege that would allow graduates of American Bar Association-accredited law schools to be admitted without taking the bar. That option would quickly alleviate the uncertainty that third-years are grappling with and allow them to move forward with their professional plans, Buckley noted.
Law students in New York, Florida, California, the District of Columbia and other jurisdictions have circulated petitions and open letters to bar examiners, urging them to go the emergency diploma privilege route. A group of legal educators last week kicked off the diploma privilege push with a paper that recommended it as a practical way to deal with attorney licensing at an unprecedented time.
"The mistake is to assume that an exam will be possible in the fall," said Ohio State University law professor Deborah Jones Merritt, one of the paper's 11 authors. "There is a significant chance that exam-takers will study intensively for a fall exam only to have it canceled a week or two before it is offered [due to subsequent waves of infection.]"
Moreover, it's unfair to compare the bar results of this year's graduates to previous classes, given the additional stresses and responsibilities they are dealing with right now, said Touro College Provost Patricia Salkin, another of the paper's co-authors.
"It will be unfair to equate the grading on this exam given all of the inconsistencies," Salkin said. "As businesses are using force majeure and acts of god to justify reorganizations, we need to accept that this is a colossal disruption that calls for humanity and reasoned alternatives to the bar exam for the class of 2020 that will allow them to enter the profession."
New York's decision to delay the exam may also prompt a rush of third-year students in the state signing up for the July test in other jurisdictions that use the Uniform Bar Exam, hoping that those states will move forward, noted CUNY Law Dean Mary Lu Bilek. The UBE allows test takers to transfer their schools to any UBE jurisdiction and be admitted without having to take that state's bar.
But it seems, at least initially, that jurisdictions are favoring postponement over bypassing the test altogether. The New York Court of Appeals did not offer any explanation of its decision to postpone the exam—beyond the inability to safely administer the test in July—when it announced the delay Friday.
That decision came before the State Bar of New York's Task Force on the New York Bar Examination issued any recommendations, said chairman Alan Scheinkman, a state court appellate judge. But the task force had independently reached the conclusion that postponement is the best course of action, he said in an interview Monday. The task force considered an emergency diploma privilege and dismissed it.
"For one thing, there are about 15% of first-time test takers who do not pass," Scheinkman said. "In this current year, where a lot of schools have gone to pass/fail courses, we would be very concerned about admitting people who have not shown a minimum degree of competency."
The task force is recommending that New York's fall bar exam be held as closely as possible to Labor Day, he added. That would mean a relatively short six- or seven-week delay for law students, allowing them study over the summer, Scheinkman said. Plus, it would allow them to get the exam out of the way before they start their jobs in the fall.
The task force is also thinking through alternatives should a bar exam still not be possible in the fall, he said. If the test is delayed further, the group recommends expanding New York's student practice order program, which allows law students and some graduates to practice in government or legal aid settings under the supervision of a licensed attorney. It should be expanded to allow graduates caught in limbo to also practice in private settings, Scheinkman said.
But he cautioned that law students should relax because the state will find a way to enable them to be admitted, even if it comes with a delay.
"People are dying and losing their jobs," he said. "This is a hardship, but we will get through it."
Monday's order from the Massachusetts court system also alludes to the possibility that a fall bar exam may not be possible.
"In the event that limitations on large gatherings continue to interfere with a fall administration of the Massachusetts bar examination, alternative means for testing of applicants for Massachusetts bar admission will be devised and announced," the announcement reads.
Buckley said that she and other students will continue to organize and lobby the New York State Court of Appeals to adopt an emergency diploma privilege program.
"I know the Court of Appeals is worried about it because it sounds like it's too easy," she said. "But the route of going through emergency diploma privilege still requires you go through a required course [of legal education]. It would allow students to stay on the timeline of being able to get a job by the end of the summer. It would relieve a lot of the economic, personal, and emotional burden on every student who is planning on taking the bar in July."
Jonathan Ringel (@jonathanringel), managing editor of the Daily Report, contributed to this version of this article, which first appeared on Law.com.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUniversity of Georgia School of Law Finds Next Dean on Its Own Faculty
3 minute readTeen Charged in Barrow School Shooting and His Father to Stay in Custody After Hearings
5 minute readFTC, For-Profit Online Education Group Reach $43.5M Agreement After Consumer Protection Suit Filed Monday
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250