Pro-Life Student Group Sues Georgia Tech for Denying Funding to Host Alveda King
The group had invited King to speak about abortion and civil rights.
April 01, 2020 at 06:13 PM
3 minute read
A student group at the Georgia Institute of Technology is suing after it was denied funding to host an event featuring the niece of Martin Luther King Jr., who was slated to speak about abortion and civil rights.
The student organization, Students for Life, with the support of the national Alliance Defending Freedom, is asking a federal judge in Atlanta to place a moratorium on the university's collection of certain student activity fees and to reimburse hundreds of dollars in mandatory fees billed to the plaintiffs, exempt them from paying those fees going forward, and to release more than $2,300 in funds requested to host Alveda King. The lawsuit targets university officials, the Student Government Association and the state Board of Regents.
The plaintiffs include Haley Theis, the current president of Students for Life; and past president Brian Cochran, who graduated from the university last December. The organization is represented by Alliance Defending Freedom's legal counsel Caleb Dalton; alliance lawyers in Virginia and Georgia; and Foster, Foster and Smith in Jonesboro.
Students for Life of America is a national pro-life organization dedicated to training and equipping students to lead local pro-life student groups at high schools and universities. On Wednesday, national President Kristan Hawkins said in a news release distributed by the alliance, "Courageous student leaders across the country face real opposition from their schools because they choose to speak for the defenseless and want to peacefully educate their fellow students about it. The Constitution is clear that public universities can't engage in the type of discrimination that has taken place at Georgia Tech."
Georgia Tech spokesman Joshua Stewart said Wednesday evening the university was just learning of the litigation and had no comment on the complaint. But he added, "Georgia Tech holds freedom of expression as an essential cornerstone to the advancement of knowledge."
The suit, filed Wednesday, alleges that Georgia Tech's Student Government Association violated the First and Fourteenth amendments when it denied Students for Life money to host King. The 68-year-old evangelist, who is an outspoken supporter of President Donald Trump, was slated to speak on abortion and civil rights, including her own family's experiences in the civil rights movement.
While similar student association requests were routinely "fast-tracked" with little, if any, discussion, Students for Life alleges the SGA "interrogated" Cochran on the "content and viewpoints" that King would present. The suit claimed that SGA members denied the funds, claiming that King's life was "inherently religious" and that they couldn't separate the religious aspect of her life from her planned keynote speech.
Students for Life and their attorneys contend that it is "discriminatory and unconstitutional" to withhold student activity fee funding "simply because a group holds a pro-life, conservative, or religious belief."
"If public universities wish to force students to pay student activity fees, then those universities have an affirmative duty to ensure that the funds are distributed in a viewpoint neutral manner," the suit contends. "When universities dictate, or grant students the power to dictate which messages and messengers are allowed on campus, they transform universities from 'marketplaces of ideas' to a seller's market of a single ideology deemed acceptable to the SGA."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJustice Known for Asking 'Tough Questions' Resolves to Improve Civility
4 minute readAlston & Bird Adds M&A, Private Equity Team From McDermott in New York
4 minute readVeteran Federal Trade Law Enforcer Joins King & Spalding in Washington
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250