GeorgiaCarry Sues to Force Fulton Probate Judge to Resume Issuing Gun Licenses During COVID-19 Pandemic
John Monroe, an attorney for GeorgiaCarry.Org, said that a decision to suspend the issuance of weapons carry licenses for handguns as a "nonessential" service is a Second Amendment violation.
April 10, 2020 at 05:22 PM
3 minute read
John Monroe, vice president and board member, GeorgiaCarry.org.
Gun rights group GeorgiaCarry.Org has sued to force Fulton County's probate judge to accept and process firearms licenses despite a statewide judicial emergency.
The organization, dedicated to removing regulations and laws it believes infringe on the ability to acquire and carry firearms, has asked a federal judge for a writ of mandamus ordering Fulton County Probate Judge Pinkie Toomer and her staff to lift a suspension on the issuance of gun licenses put in place after the chief justice of the Supreme Court of Georgia declared a state of judicial emergency March 14.
That declaration, intended to curtail the spread of COVID-19, directed Georgia courts to maintain only essential functions for the duration of the emergency, which has been extended through May 13. But according to the suit, the state's probate judges, including Toomer, do not consider issuing gun licenses an essential function.
The suit also seeks an injunction prohibiting Gov. Brian Kemp from enforcing a state law requiring a license to carry a handgun in public.
In a March 17 memo, the state Council of Probate Judges notified its members it does not consider concealed carry licenses an essential function. The memo also noted that the judicial emergency extended deadlines for license renewals, and that no temporary license was needed to replace an expired license while the emergency remains in force.
A council spokesman declined to comment on the suit.
Attorney John Monroe, vice president and counsel for GeorgiaCarry, said he filed the suit on behalf of group member Sara Carter because the Fulton probate court's decision to treat the issuance of gun licenses as a nonessential function violates the Second Amendment's guarantee of an individual's fundamental right to carry arms. Monroe also said a handgun is "the quintessential gun for self-defense."
Because probate judges are currently not issuing new weapons licenses during the judicial emergency, "If you don't already have a license, you are banned from exercising your Second Amendment right in public," Monroe said.
Monroe said he doesn't know when Carter, who has been a GeorgiaCarry member for several years, acquired the handgun she wants to license or whether she did so after the judicial emergency took effect.
A hearing is scheduled next Wednesday in front of U.S. District Judge Steve Jones of the Northern District of Georgia, he said.
Earlier this month, the National Rifle Association filed suit in federal court in New York challenging restrictions put in place as a result of the coronavirus that the NRA claimed led gun stores to be treated as nonessential businesses.
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo's shelter-in-place directive did not explicitly list firearm and ammunition retailers as essential, but the NRA contended that officials interpreting the executive order have required "the closure of substantially all retailers of firearms and ammunition."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
On the Move: Hunton Andrews Kurth Practice Leader Named Charlotte Managing Partner
6 minute read
Paul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
Atlanta Attorneys Rely on Google Earth, YouTube for Evidence in $6M Faulty Guardrail Settlement
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
