A Family Lawyer Explains Co-Parenting Issues During the Pandemic
What is a separated parent to do about custody exchanges? Can childcare workers still come to the house? Can a parent withhold parenting time if that parent doesn't think the visit is in the child's best interest?
April 14, 2020 at 10:56 AM
7 minute read
On March 14, the state of Georgia declared a state public health emergency due to the coronavirus, COVID-19. Almost immediately, local governments began issuing their own orders, further limiting social interactions and closing schools.
Then, on the afternoon of Thursday, April 2, Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp issued a temporary shelter-In-place order. His order requires that all residents and visitors are to remain in their home, with limited exceptions, until April 13. This order also expressly supersedes any other order or ordinance of a city or local government. As of today, Georgia's state of emergency extends through May 13 and our statewide shelter in place order runs through April 30.
This is all well and good for the safety of the general public; however, what is a separated parent to do about custody exchanges? Can childcare workers still come to the house? Can a parent withhold parenting time if that parent doesn't think the visit is in the child's best interest?
As with everything in the law, it depends, but generally parenting time should continue and the pandemic should not be used as an excuse to restrict the other parent's custody time or otherwise overreach without legal justification.
Should children go on custody visits?
Yes. In his clarification order, the governor made clear that no provision of the shelter-in-place order "shall limit, infringe, suspend, or supplant any judicial order, judgment, or decree, including custodial arrangements …" and, further, that this order shall not be used "as a defense to an action in violation of a judicial order, judgment, custodial arrangement, or decree by any court."
Georgia superior courts have also released guidance that parental time with children is essential and should continue. If the parenting plan is determined by the school calendar, it should continue to follow that calendar, even when school is not in session. The thought process appears to be that a child of separated/divorced parents has two homes and, therefore, the child has the ability to "shelter in place" at either home.
In these times, communication is key. Discuss with the other parent social distancing parameters and hygiene practices. When in doubt or if there is a disagreement, refer to recommendations from public health officials and attempt to align with the other parent on a baseline standard.
What if the other parent is not is practicing social distancing or because of their essential job that parent cannot practice social distancing? What if my child (or another family member in my home) is high risk?
This is the gray area that will likely be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Generally, a child should go on a custody visit, but that's not to say there may not be exceptions. Reasonableness after consideration of all circumstances will become paramount. For example, if a parent (or someone in that parent's home) is not practicing social distancing, it may be reasonable to withhold parenting time temporarily until that person begins following local orders and recommendations. As another example: If a child is high risk, it may be appropriate temporarily to halt visits so that the child can practice self, in-home isolation. Communicate concerns and possible solutions with the other parent. It may be possible to reach an agreement where virtual visits (via FaceTime, Zoom or Skype) occur regularly while the shelter-in-place order is in effect and schedule make up time once the order is lifted.
What if one parent (or someone in that home) is engaged in an essential service industry, such as healthcare?
One possible solution is setting up "disinfecting areas" at the door whereby all outside items—bags, clothing, shoes, etc.—are immediately deposited at the door, placed into garbage bags to be cleaned and/or wiped down with disinfectant. These workarounds, although not foolproof, may be a way to reach a compromise with another parent if implemented, rather than restricting any access.
But this is a slippery slope. Again, generally custody visits should continue during the pandemic. Personal fears and anxieties on their own do not warrant withholding parenting time. Therefore, if a parent is considering withholding parenting time, and especially if the other parent is not in agreement, parents are well-advised to speak with their legal professionals.
Bear in mind that these concerns are not limited to divorced or separated families. Many families have a parent who is engaged in an essential service industry, such as healthcare. In those cases, if space allows, many families are choosing to "socially distance" even within the home. Other families have set up "disinfecting areas" at the door whereby all outside items—bags, clothing, shoes, etc.—are immediately deposited at the door, placed into garbage bags to be cleaned and/or wiped down with disinfectant. One healthcare worker states that, upon returning from work, he undresses at the station, wraps a (clean) towel around himself, and immediately showers in a bathroom that is not used by any other member of the family. These workarounds, although not foolproof, may be a way to reach a compromise with another parent if implemented.
What about nannies or other in-home providers of services?
The state order provides an exception for visitors "to provide support for the person to conduct activities of daily living or instrumental activities of daily living." This is broad wording, but it suggests that in-home care for children can continue. (The governor's clarifying order seems to further make clear that, yes, in-home care to children and the elderly is an essential service at this time.)
That said, for purposes of co-parenting and compliance with the state order, it is essential that the parents communicate to ensure that the "visitor" is otherwise practicing appropriate social distancing and hygiene practices both inside and outside the home. In other words, the "visitor" should be traveling only from his or her home to yours.
What if the other parent is practicing self-isolation? Can that parent demand the same of the other parent?
Generally, no. So long as the other parent is in conformance with the order, another parent cannot demand a higher standard. Again, however, if there is a high-risk situation involving the child, all parents are well-advised to speak to their medical and legal professionals before adhering to a lower standard of care.
In sum, the best practices for parenting during the pandemic are:
- Be rational and reasonable;
- Engage in effective and regular communication; and ]
- Follow all legal orders, including the custody order.
If any doubt remains, call your legal professional. These are anxious and uncertain times but, at the end of the day, the children's best interest remains paramount.
The full April 2, 2020, Georgia state executive order is available at https://gov.georgia.gov/executive-action/executive-orders/2020-executive-orders.
The clarification order dated April 3 is available at https://gov.georgia.gov/document/2020-executive-order/04032002/download.
Jessica Reece Fagan is a partner/shareholder at the law firm of Hedgepeth Heredia, which specializes in family law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBusiness Breakups: Why Business and Commercial Cases Are Well-Suited to Mediation
5 minute readIn RE: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250