Hearing Over Handgun Carry License Suspensions Goes Remote Because of COVID-19
Lawyers, parties and members of the public may dial in to monitor an emergency hearing challenging a decision by Fulton County's probate judge to suspend the issuance of handgun carry permits as a non-essential function during the current judicial emergency.
April 14, 2020 at 05:27 PM
2 minute read
Judge Steve C. Jones. (Photo: John Disney/ALM)
An emergency hearing on whether issuing handgun carry licenses is an essential function of probate judges operating under judicial emergency orders due to COVID-19 will take place via a publicly accessible teleconference Wednesday morning.
The hearing, sought by pro-gun advocacy group GeorgiaCarry.Org and one of its members, was originally scheduled to take place at the Richard Russell Federal Building in downtown Atlanta. On Tuesday, the court posted a notice changing the hearing to a teleconference "in the interests of public safety."
Members of the media and the general public who wish to listen to the hearing are directed to call 1-888-684-8852, and use the access code 6879805#. (If asked for a security code, it is 2345.) It begins at 10:30 a.m. Recording or broadcasting the judicial proceedings is prohibited. Violations may result in sanctions including the suspension, revocation or restriction of access to court proceedings.
John Monroe, vice president and counsel for GeorgiaCarry, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus last Friday challenging the Fulton County probate court's decision to treat the issuance of handgun carry permits as a nonessential function.
In Georgia, no license is needed to carry a handgun in a person's home, vehicle, place of business, while fishing or hunting, or unloaded in a case. No carry license is required for long-barreled guns. But Monroe said suspending, even temporarily, the ability of gun owners to acquire a license to carry their handguns in public venues violates the Second Amendment.
Monroe also has asked the court for an injunction to stop enforcement of law requiring a license to carry a handgun in public.
The case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Steve Jones.
The statewide judicial emergency suspending nonessential functions was put in place March 14 by Chief Justice Harold Melton of the Supreme Court of Georgia.
In a March 17 memo, the state Council of Probate Judges notified its members it does not consider firearms carry licenses an essential function. The memo also noted that the judicial emergency extended deadlines for license renewals, and that no temporary license was needed to replace an expired license while the emergency remains in force.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
'A 58-Year-Old Engine That Needs an Overhaul': Judge Wants Traffic Law Amended
3 minute read
Appeals Court Removes Fulton DA From Georgia Election Case Against Trump, Others
6 minute read
Family of 'Cop City' Activist Killed by Ga. Troopers Files Federal Lawsuit
5 minute read
Fulton Judge Rejects Attempt by Trump Campaign Lawyer to Invalidate Guilty Plea in Georgia Election Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
