Ga. Supreme Court's First Zoom Arguments to Run Monday Through Thursday
For its first-ever remote oral arguments, the Georgia Supreme Court will hear appeals of several murder convictions plus, a personal injury lawsuit against a sheriff over a deputy's car crash and a legal malpractice case against an appellate lawyer.
April 17, 2020 at 06:08 PM
5 minute read
For the first time since the new coronavirus pandemic emergency started, the Georgia Supreme Court will hear oral arguments next week—but like a lot of things these days, they won't look the same.
The justices will consider appeals of several murder convictions plus, a personal injury lawsuit against a sheriff over a deputy's car crash and a legal malpractice case against an appellate lawyer. It sounds like business as usual. And the arguments will be livestreamed on the court website, as always. But instead of sitting together on their bench with the lawyers arguing before them, the justices' faces will show up separately on a Zoom teleconference call, as will the lawyers arguing.
Chief Justice Harold Melton extended the statewide judicial emergency April 6. The new order runs until May 13, extending by a month the one Melton signed on March 14, which was due to expire April 13. Both orders close the courts to all but essential functions in order to control the spread of COVID-19. At the same time, the courts are ordered to remain open to deal with matters that are critical or "essential" to protect the "health, safety, and liberty of individuals."
Melton announced on March 27 that the court would hold its first ever oral arguments by videoconference next week. "We are committed to continuing the court's business with as little disruption as possible," Melton said then. "Thankfully, we now have the technology that makes this possible."
Starting Monday and continuing through Thursday, attorneys will argue 19 cases before eight justices, who rather than being seated on the bench in the new Nathan Deal Judicial Center, will be seated for the most part in their homes. Only Melton will take his seat on the bench in the new courtroom. The court will use the videoconferencing service called Zoom.
"This is a first for us," Melton said. "So please be patient if we run into some technological glitches. Hopefully, it will go off without a hitch. That is our goal."
The high court won't be the first one in the state to Zoom in.
Judge C. LaTain "Tain" Kell of the Cobb Superior Court called his intermediate drug court to order March 25 while sitting at the bench in an empty courtroom wearing latex gloves. The session lasted until the battery on his cell phone died. And no one spread any virus. Drug court participants, counselors and staff had all downloaded the Zoom video call app on their smartphones and joined a meeting that Kell hosted.
"We're trying something new here today," Kell told the group. "But the point is still the same. We're here for you."
The Georgia Court of Appeals will soon follow, Judge Stephen Dillard (@JudgeDillard) said Friday by tweet. Dillard said the Fourth Division, which includes himself and Judges Brian Rickman and Trent Brown, will hold oral arguments via Zoom on May 5, 2020, at 10:30 a.m. Those arguments also will be posted to watch on the court's livestream.
Many other courts of last resort around the country either are doing the same or soon will, Chief Justice Nathan Hecht of the Texas Supreme Court said Friday. He is chairman of the National Center for State Courts and president of the national Conference of Chief Justices. The Center for State Courts said Friday that those in Arizona, California, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia have used videoconferencing technology to gather justices and attorneys. Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Wisconsin and Wyoming have announced they will be using video technology for their upcoming oral arguments. Several other states either have (Alaska, Missouri, Vermont, Virginia) or soon will (Connecticut, Nebraska) use teleconferencing for oral arguments. In most cases, either live audio or video feeds of the hearings are made available to the public, with some courts providing a recording shortly after the proceeding is completed.
"The COVID-19 pandemic has required many adjustments to the justice system," Hecht said in his opening remarks of the first remote hearings held by the Texas Supreme Court. "Rather than proceed without argument, we have decided to proceed through remote connections." Hecht said he anticipates that the surge to videoconferencing brought on by the coronavirus is forever changing how courts do business. "I can't imagine that it's not going to outlast the pandemic and change the way we do business generally, pretty profoundly," he said.
Meanwhile, the duration of the pandemic remained uncertain. Georgia public health leaders forecast a peak in early May. At noon Friday, the total number of cases rose to 17,194, with 3,324 people hospitalized and 650 deaths, according to the Georgia Department of Public Health COVID-19 Daily Status Report.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All12-Partner Team 'Surprises' Atlanta Firm’s Leaders With Exit to Launch New Reed Smith Office
4 minute readAfter Breakaway From FisherBroyles, Pierson Ferdinand Bills $75M in First Year
5 minute readOn the Move: Freeman Mathis & Gary Adds Florida Partners, Employment Pro Joins Jackson Lewis
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Commuted by Trump
- 2Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
- 3CFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
- 4Judge Orders SoCal Edison to Preserve Evidence Relating to Los Angeles Wildfires
- 5Legal Community Luminaries Honored at New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250