Ga. Supreme Court's First Zoom Arguments to Run Monday Through Thursday
For its first-ever remote oral arguments, the Georgia Supreme Court will hear appeals of several murder convictions plus, a personal injury lawsuit against a sheriff over a deputy's car crash and a legal malpractice case against an appellate lawyer.
April 17, 2020 at 06:08 PM
5 minute read
For the first time since the new coronavirus pandemic emergency started, the Georgia Supreme Court will hear oral arguments next week—but like a lot of things these days, they won't look the same.
The justices will consider appeals of several murder convictions plus, a personal injury lawsuit against a sheriff over a deputy's car crash and a legal malpractice case against an appellate lawyer. It sounds like business as usual. And the arguments will be livestreamed on the court website, as always. But instead of sitting together on their bench with the lawyers arguing before them, the justices' faces will show up separately on a Zoom teleconference call, as will the lawyers arguing.
Chief Justice Harold Melton extended the statewide judicial emergency April 6. The new order runs until May 13, extending by a month the one Melton signed on March 14, which was due to expire April 13. Both orders close the courts to all but essential functions in order to control the spread of COVID-19. At the same time, the courts are ordered to remain open to deal with matters that are critical or "essential" to protect the "health, safety, and liberty of individuals."
Melton announced on March 27 that the court would hold its first ever oral arguments by videoconference next week. "We are committed to continuing the court's business with as little disruption as possible," Melton said then. "Thankfully, we now have the technology that makes this possible."
Starting Monday and continuing through Thursday, attorneys will argue 19 cases before eight justices, who rather than being seated on the bench in the new Nathan Deal Judicial Center, will be seated for the most part in their homes. Only Melton will take his seat on the bench in the new courtroom. The court will use the videoconferencing service called Zoom.
"This is a first for us," Melton said. "So please be patient if we run into some technological glitches. Hopefully, it will go off without a hitch. That is our goal."
The high court won't be the first one in the state to Zoom in.
Judge C. LaTain "Tain" Kell of the Cobb Superior Court called his intermediate drug court to order March 25 while sitting at the bench in an empty courtroom wearing latex gloves. The session lasted until the battery on his cell phone died. And no one spread any virus. Drug court participants, counselors and staff had all downloaded the Zoom video call app on their smartphones and joined a meeting that Kell hosted.
"We're trying something new here today," Kell told the group. "But the point is still the same. We're here for you."
The Georgia Court of Appeals will soon follow, Judge Stephen Dillard (@JudgeDillard) said Friday by tweet. Dillard said the Fourth Division, which includes himself and Judges Brian Rickman and Trent Brown, will hold oral arguments via Zoom on May 5, 2020, at 10:30 a.m. Those arguments also will be posted to watch on the court's livestream.
Many other courts of last resort around the country either are doing the same or soon will, Chief Justice Nathan Hecht of the Texas Supreme Court said Friday. He is chairman of the National Center for State Courts and president of the national Conference of Chief Justices. The Center for State Courts said Friday that those in Arizona, California, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia have used videoconferencing technology to gather justices and attorneys. Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Wisconsin and Wyoming have announced they will be using video technology for their upcoming oral arguments. Several other states either have (Alaska, Missouri, Vermont, Virginia) or soon will (Connecticut, Nebraska) use teleconferencing for oral arguments. In most cases, either live audio or video feeds of the hearings are made available to the public, with some courts providing a recording shortly after the proceeding is completed.
"The COVID-19 pandemic has required many adjustments to the justice system," Hecht said in his opening remarks of the first remote hearings held by the Texas Supreme Court. "Rather than proceed without argument, we have decided to proceed through remote connections." Hecht said he anticipates that the surge to videoconferencing brought on by the coronavirus is forever changing how courts do business. "I can't imagine that it's not going to outlast the pandemic and change the way we do business generally, pretty profoundly," he said.
Meanwhile, the duration of the pandemic remained uncertain. Georgia public health leaders forecast a peak in early May. At noon Friday, the total number of cases rose to 17,194, with 3,324 people hospitalized and 650 deaths, according to the Georgia Department of Public Health COVID-19 Daily Status Report.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFulton Jury Returns Defense Verdict After Pedestrian Killed by MARTA Bus
8 minute readFulton Judge Rejects Attempt by Trump Campaign Lawyer to Invalidate Guilty Plea in Georgia Election Case
3 minute read$6.8M Awarded to Electrocuted Employee for Improperly Marked Utilities
'The Best Strategy': $795K Resolution Reached in Federal COVID-Accommodation Dispute
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Mental Health Issues Don’t Get a Holiday
- 2'It's Got to Be a Wake-Up Call:' Atlanta Attorney Hopes $16M Verdict Spurs Training Changes at Hotels
- 3FTC Bans 'Junk Fees' in Live-Event Tickets and Short-Term Lodging
- 4California Legal Awards Moving to Mid-Summer Date in 2025, Adds New Categories
- 5Law Student Sues NY Attorney Grievance Officials, Seeking Materials Over Sexual Assault Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250